SK: Could you show some of the other
> SC: Are you suggesting that if there are zero other ink
> droplets on this page then that proves this is not an ink
> droplet or proves that Vyse didn't tap his pen twice here?
Actually, I was thinking of on all the other journal pages... not just one. When you look at a document then surely you read the whole thing.
> Go and have a look at the original page I posted elsewhere on this
> forum. You will see that the two dots are barely
> distinguishable and look just like one dot.
But they're clearly two dots, aren't they?
> But if you insist these are three deliberate dots (and not
> intended to be two dots), why would Vyse draw just two dots
> elsewhere in his private journal? And if three dots were
> deliberate here, where is the missing one in the Chamber
I think he had really bad light and was in a hurry and put down some of the specks he saw on the wall -- and then corrected them when he had a better look.
> You take pedantic to new levels.
...one of my many charms. :)