> In order for it to be "eerily like Khnum" you need TWO separate
> glyphs, not a single quadruped glyph which "might have been
> I suggest you go remind yourself of how the word "Khnum" was
> written because your post suggests you don't actually know if
> you think it is "eerily like Khnum".
> The relative sizing and spacing of the glyphs in the cartouche
> suggests strongly that there is only one glyph - whatever you
> might interpret it to have been.
> I prefer not to "keep in mind" outlandish speculation which is
> not supported by the physical evidence, thanks.
Deflecting off topic with more typical picayune sarcasm and intimidation again, instead of sticking to the point, eh?
Does your expertise in reading the glyphs lead you believe "Khufu" appears anywhere on the Abydos list?