> Clearly Mr Perring thought the two dots were random paint
> splashes as he omits them from his drawing of the Khufu
> So, if Mr Perring could come to the conclusion that these two
> dots were random paint splashes (just like the others we see
> within and outwith the cartouche), why didn't Vyse & Hill come
> to the same conclusion?
Perring and Vyse worked together and both published the cartouche without the 2 dots so they both came to the same conclusion. I think they probably talked it over.
Edit added after looking at Perring and Audrey's post:
I see that Perring does indeed have the 2 dots but Vyse does not in their publications.
Post Edited (07-Sep-14 19:44)