Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
eyeofhorus33 wrote:
> If it's OK to write the name Ramses in six different ways,
> what's the problem with the much more minor hieroglyphic
> variant spelling of Khufu?
My obviously naive question is, "who said it was ok to write the name Ramses in six different ways" in the first place? How do we know for sure all those names refer to the exact same person?
To expose my ignorance even further, how do we know for sure that all of those versions of the name are really even referring to a human being vs. some other inanimate, proper noun representation?
> If it's OK to write the name Ramses in six different ways,
> what's the problem with the much more minor hieroglyphic
> variant spelling of Khufu?
My obviously naive question is, "who said it was ok to write the name Ramses in six different ways" in the first place? How do we know for sure all those names refer to the exact same person?
To expose my ignorance even further, how do we know for sure that all of those versions of the name are really even referring to a human being vs. some other inanimate, proper noun representation?
