Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Audrey wrote:
>I'm not SUGGESTING anything. You asked - after 1837. I just
>quoted Wilde, which WAS after 1837.
>What is your problem dude ?
No problem I guess....... my original question was in the context of the speculation that the salt deposits on ancient hieroglyphics were a modern phenomena of the last 200 years (thus significant salt being mobilized (i.e. transported out of the rock and precipitated on the surfaces) after 1837)......... salt deposits appear to be described to some degree as being in the upper chamber before and shortly after this claimed "forgery" occurred. Did Vyse clean off the surfaces and "forge" away to be again coated in salt sometime later for some reason or not...........
Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@usa.net)
>I'm not SUGGESTING anything. You asked - after 1837. I just
>quoted Wilde, which WAS after 1837.
>What is your problem dude ?
No problem I guess....... my original question was in the context of the speculation that the salt deposits on ancient hieroglyphics were a modern phenomena of the last 200 years (thus significant salt being mobilized (i.e. transported out of the rock and precipitated on the surfaces) after 1837)......... salt deposits appear to be described to some degree as being in the upper chamber before and shortly after this claimed "forgery" occurred. Did Vyse clean off the surfaces and "forge" away to be again coated in salt sometime later for some reason or not...........
Archae Solenhofen (solenhofen@usa.net)
