Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower wrote:
> Origyptian wrote:
>
> > But you think we have an indisputably authentic discovery?
>
> Careful consideration of the state of knowledge in 1837 shows
> the forgery claim to be farcically implausible.
>
> I am satisfied that all of the objections to the discovery are
> spurious and very largely based on wish-fulfilment fantasy:
> people want their pyramid fantasies and they hate Vyse for
> standing in the way of those fantasies.
>
> M.
>
Well, I'm very happy you are satisfied. Just as you most likely are satisfied that Khufu built G1 as his tomb during the 4th Dynasty despite any reasonable logic to account for such a characterization.
Meanwhile, please stop bullying anyone else who remains skeptical based on their own perspective of objective science and logic.
Respectfully,
O'n
> Origyptian wrote:
>
> > But you think we have an indisputably authentic discovery?
>
> Careful consideration of the state of knowledge in 1837 shows
> the forgery claim to be farcically implausible.
>
> I am satisfied that all of the objections to the discovery are
> spurious and very largely based on wish-fulfilment fantasy:
> people want their pyramid fantasies and they hate Vyse for
> standing in the way of those fantasies.
>
> M.
>
Well, I'm very happy you are satisfied. Just as you most likely are satisfied that Khufu built G1 as his tomb during the 4th Dynasty despite any reasonable logic to account for such a characterization.
Meanwhile, please stop bullying anyone else who remains skeptical based on their own perspective of objective science and logic.
Respectfully,
O'n
