Then you'll also understand why I cannot even begin to entertain your notion of the script having peculiarly "Victorian characteristics".
Without explanation, it is merely unsubstantiated speculation.
But you already know that.
And in the absence of any admission of knowledge of the characteristics of handwritten 4th dynasty script, even more wildly speculative.
So, you'll have to forgive me for not wishing to give your 'idea' any further consideration.
I'm sure it will make sense to you why I hold such a view of it.