Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton wrote:
> MS: Go on, Creighton, prove me wrong.
>
> SC: I do not need to quote any Egyptologist to prove you wrong,
> Stower--how could they? The EVIDENCE proves you wrong. You
> know--all that material you suppressed for 16 years. Prove you
> wrong? You are, far and away, the very least of my concerns.
Which you prove by answering so promptly — and so, so predictably, with a lie and an evasion.
That I “suppressed” material is an outright lie. On the contrary, the material in question has been available throughout (as you know) in a public archive (Buckinghamshire County Records). That you (like others) lacked the wit to find it without my help is not my fault.
You don’t need to quote any Egyptologists? But you did, Scott, you did (or so you say). Why should we take you seriously, when a simple question about your friend’s bona fides has you ducking and diving?
The <shout>evidence</shout> proves me wrong? No, Creighton, your wilful misrepresentation of the evidence is alleged by you to prove me wrong, something very different.
M.
> MS: Go on, Creighton, prove me wrong.
>
> SC: I do not need to quote any Egyptologist to prove you wrong,
> Stower--how could they? The EVIDENCE proves you wrong. You
> know--all that material you suppressed for 16 years. Prove you
> wrong? You are, far and away, the very least of my concerns.
Which you prove by answering so promptly — and so, so predictably, with a lie and an evasion.
That I “suppressed” material is an outright lie. On the contrary, the material in question has been available throughout (as you know) in a public archive (Buckinghamshire County Records). That you (like others) lacked the wit to find it without my help is not my fault.
You don’t need to quote any Egyptologists? But you did, Scott, you did (or so you say). Why should we take you seriously, when a simple question about your friend’s bona fides has you ducking and diving?
The <shout>evidence</shout> proves me wrong? No, Creighton, your wilful misrepresentation of the evidence is alleged by you to prove me wrong, something very different.
M.
