Martin Stower Wrote:

> Funny how “Sean Hunter” has suddenly
> discovered his indignation, more than three months
> after the event

I wasn't aware that there was some kind of STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS on referring to this kind of disgusting, violent comment in someone's public posting history? You are happy to trawl my posts from years ago.

Martin Stower Wrote:
>—by happy coincidence when a need
> has arisen to mount an ad hominem attack on me.
>

Ditch the old "ad hominem" garbage mate, no one uses that seriosuly on the Internet anymore, you devalued that currency long ago. Plus YOU brought up the exact quote here, you fool. Besides, how more "ad hominem" cn we get, old chap, than telling someone they would of, could of, should of, might, get a glass punched into their face?



Martin Stower Wrote:
> So, remarkably, we have another Scot who (just
> like Scott) has no inkling of what a great Scot
> (David Hume) made perfectly clear: the difference
> between “is” and “ought”.
>
> That my statements are consistent throughout may
> be verified by anyone with a functioning
> comprehension of the English language.

I'm sure David Hume would be spinning in his grave in Edinburgh if he thought a creature like you would be using his name to justify such a nasty, violent, threatening statement in the midst of an online discussion.

As for English lessons - here's the only one you need. Don't use the words GLASS, PUNCHED and FACE in the same sentence and in the same manner, especially to a lady.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07-Oct-16 09:29 by LonelyAngel.