Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
> > > Try telling readers of this board that Audrey
> > > Mulertt is an epitome of the female gender.
> Now
We'll try again shall we..
Read the above.. Your statement.
You said..
"TRY TELLING READERS THAT AUDREY MULERTT IS AN EPITOME OF THE FEMALE GENDER"
YOU used the term "EPITOME OF THE FEMALE GENDER".
Define what you mean by the above statement.
What is the "epitome of the female gender"?
How, in your view is the female gender epitomised?
As distinct from say the male gender.
Why would "readers" (your self perceived flock) need telling, as suggested by yourself, that Audrey is "an epitome of the female gender"
Especially today, in the 21st century, which you claim to be living in.
Or was it just another typically Stoweresq, brutal and cowardly insult aimed at a woman?
How low can you sink.? Really
> > > Try telling readers of this board that Audrey
> > > Mulertt is an epitome of the female gender.
> Now
We'll try again shall we..
Read the above.. Your statement.
You said..
"TRY TELLING READERS THAT AUDREY MULERTT IS AN EPITOME OF THE FEMALE GENDER"
YOU used the term "EPITOME OF THE FEMALE GENDER".
Define what you mean by the above statement.
What is the "epitome of the female gender"?
How, in your view is the female gender epitomised?
As distinct from say the male gender.
Why would "readers" (your self perceived flock) need telling, as suggested by yourself, that Audrey is "an epitome of the female gender"
Especially today, in the 21st century, which you claim to be living in.
Or was it just another typically Stoweresq, brutal and cowardly insult aimed at a woman?
How low can you sink.? Really
