Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DUNE Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You think that stone at such a joint with so
> many
> > > tons upon it would not flake?
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> >
> > Well i don't think the pressure at that point
> > would amount to tons, don't forget the
> remaining
> > length of that beam goes further down alongside
> > that side wall, and the side wall would have
> been
> > cut in the same angle as the beam.
> > Also the beam is resting against the opposite
> > beam to form the apex, so i would think very
> > little pressure is being placed at that
> juncture.
>
> I find this a strange remark. I mean, there is
> some masonry on top of this structure, isn’t
> there?
>
Sorry you lost me there.

> By the way, did you notice this?
>
Did i notice this, yes i wrote it lol

> “Although photos can not prove anything
> definitively . . . In denying what is clearly seen
> in those pics means you are attempting to suppress
> the truth . . .”
>
> M.

Of course it works both ways, but given the parameters we are working with, we are left with probabilities, given all the available evidence , and i believe the evidence is damming ,therefor what we are looking at in those pics is plaster, being there is 100% evidence of plaster being applied in these chambers means it puts the probability of it being plaster very high

You could hang on to the small percentage of it not being plaster but don't bet money on it.

DPP