> SC: Which is why the second slide explains that the disc we see
> uses a standard, 19th century printer's font for the hatched
> disc. . . .
The second slide is wrong. This material was published in 1841, before there was any standard hieroglyphic font.
> MS: The rest is a fantasy written around the
> SC: Well, of course, on planet Stower this has to be 'fantasy'
> because you simply have no other way of explaining it with your
> own narrative. . . .
On the contrary, Creighton, the problem is that there is no warrant in the evidence for what you are saying. You are writing a fantasy around the evidence. The key contentions are imports.
Post Edited (05-Jun-14 12:09)