MS: Now you’re channelling Vyse like you channelled ancient Egyptian scribes.
SC: My "channelling? Get yourself a good mirror, sunshine. "to me it looks like a misfire". Which channel gave you that cobblers?
There is nothing "channelled" in my previous post, as well you know. The LOGIC of Vyse's own statement testifies that he knew (or believed he knew) how the Khufu cartouche should look. But, of course, this simple logic just gets in the way for you, doesn't it. Have to muddy the waters by casting words like "channelling" around. LOGIC, dear boy--logic.
MS: Now you’re here, perhaps you’d like to explain your self-contraction on the drawing captioned “in Campbell’s Chamber”?
SC: The contradictions remain squarely with Vyse and with the entries he made in his journal as is plain now for all to see (with, perhaps, the exception of you).
BTW - why did you withhold the rest of this page (and the other page) from Vyse's journal that shows the Khufu cartouche (from Campbell's Chamber) without any of the hatched lines? Why show only the bottom left corner of the page? Why did you sit on this information for the best part of 20 years?
Let me guess--something to do with the full evidence in these pages contradicting the conventional narrative. Information really is power, isn't it, Mr Stower. And especially so when it is in the wrong hands i.e. with those who like to control it and who ensure the masses only get to see what they want them to see.
If you ever want to see a good example of your so-called "argumentative cheating", look no further than your own actions in this entire saga. Utterly disgraceful.
As I said in another post, more evidence will be presented in due course that further nails Vyse and his cohorts for their fraudulent act.
Post Edited (03-Jun-14 13:57)