> If Scott is just "pretending" they do not even exist and makes
> no effort as I have to explain what they actually are then
> obviously you are correct in this regard and Scott has every
> right to be taken to task on the matter. . . .
This is the case. Scott makes no effort to explain, he merely asserts that “we observe him [Vyse] having drawn a small circle with a dot in its center (Figure 4)” and gives as the figure his own drawing, thus: