> Hi eyeofhorus33,
> It has been my experience that posts of a sarcastic nature are
> mostly frowned upon on this board. I, for one, have no such
> bias and can accept that sarcasm can often serve a useful
> purpose in highlighting factors which could be the subject of
> much useless rhetoric. But, I am in the minority on that one.
> Having said that, in my mind, the wall relief in question has
> been partially, but not yet satisfactorily explained .
You have company.
I wish the interviewers on the various alt radio stations would b a bit more sarcastic, aggressive or just a little challenging to the various authors, theorists n plain crack pots, then maybe thered b less of the nonsense floating around. Alas I'm told by the producers that as soon as they go that way the interviewees dry up. Its a smallish circuit n the mystery Mafia pass the word about :-)
Alas the only place where any debate can go on is in the round table format where it gets messy n the most media savvy usually wins regardless of ideas. I think we r left with message boards with the usual circuitous arguments and occasional comic relief.