Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
GHMB,

Okay - I could spend all day deconstructing every point Callan MacKenzie has made here. But I shall concentrate on this one point (below) for that one point is all that is needed to demonstrate how the Egypt-apologists have lost this debate, to wit:

Quote

"...I don't see any problem with the quarry marks, so wouldn't see any particular point in a 'forensic scientific consideration'." - Callan MacKenzie

SC: Now I have heard everything folks. The above statement from Callan MacKenzie should demonstrate to you (if such were needed) the complete absurdity of the Egypt-apologist position and how, by such expedient argumentation, they have actually brought Egyptology into disrepute.

What Callan MacKenzie (and I imagine supported by Stower and the other Egypt-apologists on this Board and elsewhere) are essentially saying here is that it is perfectly acceptable to consider and examine all other historical evidence in a bid to determine the truth of Howard-Vyse's claimed 'discovery' BUT NOT the actual inscriptions themselves; not the ONLY primary evidence we have.

Ladies and gentlemen - does that sound like a reasonable position to take - to NOT scientifically examine the only primary evidence available? Or is it more likely the case that those who support such a position do so for no other reason than historical expediency in order to uphold and protect the status quo? The Egypt-apologists cannot and should not be allowed to argue what can and cannot be tested for to do so demonstrates in them only an unwillingness to truly seek the truth about this issue. In my opinion to take such a stance amounts to nothing more than intellectual dishonesty; an indefensible and expedient position. Everything that CAN be scientifically tested SHOULD be scientifically tested, ESPECIALLY primary evidence.

Egyptology claims to be a 'science'. Well, given the cloud of uncertainty over the historical characters and 'testimonies' involved in this debate, there is now a clear case to demand that such forensic science be done on these inscriptions; on the primary evidence.

Why are the Egypt-apologists so against the science? Why are they so afraid to even accept the idea that such science now has to be considered? There is now too much doubt over the veracity of these inscriptions to NOT demand further evidence in order to settle the issue. But the Egypt-aplogists here will tell you that they "...do not see any particular point in a 'forensic scientific consideration" of these glyphs. I ask you, ladies and gentlemen - does that sound a reasonable position to you? Is that the way to get to the truth of this question?

I think not and I sincerely hope that you do too. The Egypt-apologist position is frankly untenable. There now requires to be a call to Egyptologists and to the Egyptian SCA to undertake a thorough scientific analysis of these inscriptions. Only by so doing can we have any hope of laying this long-running issue to rest once and for all. The Egypt-apologists think by simply burying their collective head in the sand that this issue will go away. They are wrong. This issue will not go away until the hard science is done. That is the bottom line.

Now the Egypt-apologists have a choice here - they can get on board and join the demand for the science to be done; they can demonstrate their willingness to seek the truth. Or they can snipe from the sidelines and simply deny, deny, deny. If the Egypt-apologists do not join the call for forensic tests to be done on these inscriptions in a bid to determine their veracity then, quite frankly, shame on them for then it will be clear to everyone that such individuals are not seekers of truth but mere defenders of dogma.

I shall most certainly be making a call in my next book, 'Ark of the Gods' for these scientific tests to be done. I hope those of you that are not blinded by historical dogma will join me in that call. We deserve the truth.

Regards,

SC



Post Edited (20-May-13 20:29)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 1173 Dr. Troglodyte 10-May-13 20:14
William Wilberforce, crook 554 Martin Stower 11-May-13 12:17
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 521 Nejc 11-May-13 16:15
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 537 Merrell 11-May-13 18:36
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 529 Scott Creighton 12-May-13 11:27
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 606 Merrell 12-May-13 22:37
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 570 Scott Creighton 13-May-13 11:03
Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, excavator 476 Merrell 13-May-13 13:11
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 524 Scott Creighton 13-May-13 13:21
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 552 Martin Stower 13-May-13 16:14
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 435 Scott Creighton 14-May-13 09:16
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 519 Merrell 14-May-13 09:41
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 520 Scott Creighton 14-May-13 09:47
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 560 Martin Stower 15-May-13 11:18
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 628 Scott Creighton 15-May-13 12:02
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 529 Martin Stower 15-May-13 14:26
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 471 Scott Creighton 15-May-13 15:00
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 600 Martin Stower 16-May-13 09:55
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 511 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 10:04
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 508 Martin Stower 16-May-13 10:34
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 460 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 10:43
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 523 Martin Stower 16-May-13 11:00
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 589 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 11:09
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 514 Martin Stower 16-May-13 11:31
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 486 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 11:36
Re: Wilberforce, abolitionist; Vyse, 484 cladking 16-May-13 15:14
Re: What are they so afraid of? 578 Thunderbird 16-May-13 15:55
Re: What are they so afraid of? 515 cladking 16-May-13 21:40
Calling Dr. Schoch 604 Dr. Troglodyte 16-May-13 16:04
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 583 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 16:26
Logbook doubts 507 Merrell 16-May-13 21:38
Re: Logbook doubts 560 Scott Creighton 16-May-13 22:46
Re: Logbook doubts 453 Merrell 16-May-13 23:25
Re: Logbook doubts 522 Scott Creighton 17-May-13 08:00
Re: Logbook doubts 515 Merrell 17-May-13 14:30
Re: Logbook doubts 579 Scott Creighton 17-May-13 14:56
Re: Logbook doubts 514 Martin Stower 17-May-13 16:11
Re: Logbook doubts 494 Scott Creighton 17-May-13 20:53
Re: Logbook doubts 464 MJT 17-May-13 22:31
Re: Logbook doubts 549 Merrell 18-May-13 11:23
Re: Logbook doubts 607 Scott Creighton 18-May-13 12:10
Re: Logbook doubts 640 Martin Stower 20-May-13 17:54
Re: Logbook doubts 437 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 00:20
Re: Logbook doubts 525 Morten 21-May-13 09:03
Re: Logbook doubts 567 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 10:22
Re: Logbook doubts 567 Merrell 21-May-13 10:26
Re: Logbook doubts 493 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 10:35
Re: Logbook doubts 527 Merrell 21-May-13 13:46
Re: Logbook doubts 443 Morten 21-May-13 10:40
Re: Logbook doubts 532 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 11:04
Re: Logbook doubts 539 Morten 21-May-13 11:29
Re: Logbook doubts 571 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 12:04
Re: Logbook doubts 521 Morten 21-May-13 13:19
Re: Logbook doubts 627 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 13:33
Re: Logbook doubts 523 Merrell 21-May-13 14:16
Re: Logbook doubts 528 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 14:27
Re: Logbook doubts 565 Merrell 21-May-13 23:48
Re: Logbook doubts 550 Morten 21-May-13 14:37
Re: Logbook doubts 516 Scott Creighton 21-May-13 14:54
Re: Logbook doubts 550 Morten 22-May-13 10:51
Re: Logbook doubts 575 Martin Stower 21-May-13 17:13
Re: Logbook doubts 493 Audrey 22-May-13 02:20
Re: Logbook doubts 517 Morten 22-May-13 08:18
Re: Logbook doubts 482 Martin Stower 22-May-13 15:02
Re: Logbook doubts 500 Audrey 24-May-13 01:32
Re: Logbook doubts 723 Martin Stower 24-May-13 13:43
Re: Logbook doubts 410 Audrey 24-May-13 01:10
Re: Logbook doubts 438 Scott Creighton 10-Jun-14 13:15
Re: Logbook doubts 555 eyeofhorus33 10-Jun-14 18:17
Re: Logbook doubts 540 Scott Creighton 10-Jun-14 22:01
Re: Logbook doubts 482 eyeofhorus33 10-Jun-14 22:15
Re:Khufu....Hyksos? 514 Thunderbird 11-Jun-14 01:36
Re: Logbook doubts 503 Audrey 11-Jun-14 20:47
Re: Logbook doubts 641 eyeofhorus33 11-Jun-14 22:18
Re: Logbook doubts 539 Audrey 12-Jun-14 21:22
Re: Logbook doubts 478 eyeofhorus33 12-Jun-14 22:20
Re: Logbook doubts 477 cladking 13-Jun-14 00:24
Re: Logbook doubts 461 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-14 22:53
Re: Logbook doubts 472 cladking 13-Jun-14 23:23
Re: Logbook doubts 479 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-14 23:48
Re: Logbook doubts 476 cladking 14-Jun-14 00:17
Re: Logbook doubts 496 Audrey 14-Jun-14 02:17
Re: Logbook doubts 553 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-14 11:44
Re: Logbook doubts 494 cladking 14-Jun-14 15:25
context and customs 439 Audrey 14-Jun-14 19:25
Re: context and customs 437 cladking 14-Jun-14 21:23
Re: Logbook doubts 503 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-14 21:29
Re: Logbook doubts 488 cladking 14-Jun-14 22:07
Re: Logbook doubts 481 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-14 23:04
Re: Logbook doubts 514 cladking 15-Jun-14 00:29
Re: Logbook doubts 506 eyeofhorus33 15-Jun-14 18:35
Re: Logbook doubts 490 cladking 15-Jun-14 20:56
Re: Logbook doubts 502 eyeofhorus33 15-Jun-14 21:26
Language doubts 458 cladking 15-Jun-14 21:48
Re: Language doubts 465 eyeofhorus33 15-Jun-14 22:05
Re: Language doubts 475 cladking 15-Jun-14 22:51
Re: Language doubts 475 Audrey 16-Jun-14 04:17
Re: Language doubts 523 cladking 16-Jun-14 04:51
Re: Logbook doubts 394 cladking 12-Jun-14 22:57
Re:doubts 503 Thunderbird 11-Jun-14 23:36
Re:doubts 461 Audrey 12-Jun-14 19:54
Moderator Notice 466 Hoppy 22-May-13 01:32
Re: Logbook doubts 452 Audrey 22-May-13 02:52
Re: Logbook doubts 416 Martin Stower 18-May-13 13:37
Re: Logbook doubts 485 Scott Creighton 18-May-13 14:01
Re: Logbook doubts 470 Martin Stower 18-May-13 14:52
Re: Logbook doubts 467 Scott Creighton 18-May-13 17:16
Re: Logbook doubts 552 Martin Stower 20-May-13 16:57
Re: Logbook doubts 479 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 17:51
Re: Logbook doubts 458 Martin Stower 20-May-13 18:25
Re: Logbook doubts 336 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 18:49
Re: Logbook doubts 504 Martin Stower 21-May-13 15:42
Re: Logbook doubts 479 HungryHun 17-May-13 15:20
Re: Conspired.... 480 Thunderbird 17-May-13 15:47
Re: Conspired.... 478 HungryHun 17-May-13 16:04
Re: Conspired.... 452 Thunderbird 17-May-13 23:17
Re: Conspired....inspire d by money 515 Ratcho 03-Jun-13 05:57
Re: Logbook doubts 423 Martin Stower 17-May-13 16:23
Re: Logbook doubts 481 HungryHun 17-May-13 16:28
Re: Logbook doubts 481 Thunderbird 17-May-13 22:25
Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 458 LonelyAngel 29-May-13 14:41
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 438 Nejc 29-May-13 23:23
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 451 Merrell 30-May-13 09:25
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 507 Martin Stower 30-May-13 12:48
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 488 WINDINWATERS 30-May-13 14:40
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 388 Martin Stower 31-May-13 18:00
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 448 WINDINWATERS 31-May-13 21:47
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 436 LonelyAngel 30-May-13 17:43
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 436 Martin Stower 31-May-13 18:24
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 491 cladking 01-Jun-13 03:28
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 478 Merrell 01-Jun-13 11:02
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 421 LonelyAngel 03-Jun-13 20:59
Re: Would you buy a used cartouche from this man? 442 LonelyAngel 03-Jun-13 20:47
Re: Logbook doubts 652 Martin Stower 17-May-13 15:51
Re: Logbook doubts 484 Scott Creighton 17-May-13 20:27
Re: Logbook doubts 502 Nejc 17-May-13 22:28
Re: Logbook doubts 922 Martin Stower 18-May-13 14:43
Re: Logbook doubts 756 Scott Creighton 18-May-13 17:12
Re: Logbook doubts 554 Merrell 19-May-13 16:43
Re: Logbook doubts 487 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 09:38
Re: Logbook doubts 447 Merrell 20-May-13 13:29
Re: Logbook doubts 573 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 13:58
Re: Logbook doubts 459 Merrell 20-May-13 14:55
Re: Logbook doubts 479 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 18:46
Re: Logbook doubts 514 HungryHun 20-May-13 22:02
Re: Logbook doubts 476 Thanos5150 20-May-13 23:05
Re: Logbook doubts 493 sfbey 20-May-13 23:23
Re: Logbook doubts 483 Thanos5150 20-May-13 23:35
Re: Logbook doubts 495 sfbey 21-May-13 15:41
Moghrah 498 Merrell 21-May-13 18:09
Re: Logbook doubts 380 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 23:38
Re: Logbook doubts 403 Merrell 21-May-13 21:34
Re: Logbook doubts 417 Audrey 22-May-13 02:34
Re: Logbook doubts 460 Merrell 21-May-13 21:58
Re: Logbook doubts 480 Sirfiroth 22-May-13 10:42
Re: Logbook doubts 443 Merrell 22-May-13 11:43
Re: Logbook doubts 422 Sirfiroth 22-May-13 17:44
Re: Logbook doubts 362 Nejc 22-May-13 23:18
Re: Logbook doubts 349 cladking 23-May-13 00:51
Re: Logbook doubts 365 Merrell 23-May-13 08:41
Re: Logbook doubts 399 Martin Stower 20-May-13 19:19
Re: Logbook doubts 316 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 19:35
Re: Logbook doubts 435 Martin Stower 21-May-13 17:59
Moderator Warning 512 JonnyMcA 21-May-13 20:12
Moderator Warning 421 JonnyMcA 21-May-13 20:11
Re: exercise elementary caution about sources 387 Thunderbird 20-May-13 19:36
Re: Logbook doubts 430 Audrey 22-May-13 02:50
Re: Logbook doubts 373 Merrell 22-May-13 12:53
Re: Logbook doubts 346 Audrey 24-May-13 01:48
Moderator Caution 305 Hoppy 22-May-13 12:55
Re: Logbook doubts 312 Martin Stower 22-May-13 16:06
Re: Logbook doubts 270 Audrey 24-May-13 01:41
Re: Logbook doubts 272 Martin Stower 24-May-13 13:56
Re: Logbook doubts 257 Thunderbird 17-May-13 22:40
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 337 Thanos5150 16-May-13 19:41
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 303 Dr. Troglodyte 16-May-13 21:56
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 286 Thanos5150 16-May-13 23:11
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 269 Dr. Troglodyte 17-May-13 00:01
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 306 Thanos5150 17-May-13 00:30
Re: Calling Dr. Schoch 274 cladking 16-May-13 21:50
Moderator Caution 316 Hoppy 15-May-13 14:09
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 238 Martin Stower 13-May-13 16:53
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 283 Scott Creighton 13-May-13 17:40
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 272 Martin Stower 13-May-13 18:32
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 280 Scott Creighton 13-May-13 19:23
Moderator Caution #2 197 Hoppy 15-May-13 14:18
Re: William Wilberforce, crook 227 Martin Stower 15-May-13 14:52
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 272 Nejc 11-May-13 13:47
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 255 JonnyMcA 11-May-13 18:41
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 256 Audrey 12-May-13 07:59
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 231 JonnyMcA 12-May-13 09:58
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 287 HungryHun 12-May-13 13:00
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 230 HungryHun 13-May-13 12:46
Re: Caviglia's complaint.... 240 Thunderbird 13-May-13 16:20
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 238 HungryHun 13-May-13 19:36
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 231 Martin Stower 15-May-13 15:04
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 224 HungryHun 16-May-13 10:03
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 236 Martin Stower 16-May-13 10:47
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 212 Merrell 16-May-13 16:33
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 236 Martin Stower 18-May-13 15:02
Re: If fake, then... what? 264 MJT 16-May-13 12:45
More Vyse wickedness 252 Martin Stower 18-May-13 15:14
Re: More Vyse wickedness 332 Scott Creighton 19-May-13 09:01
Re: More Vyse wickedness 341 Martin Stower 20-May-13 16:44
Re: More Vyse wickedness 346 Scott Creighton 20-May-13 17:56
Re: More Vyse wickedness 384 jamesglory 21-May-13 10:26
Re: More Vyse wickedness 354 Audrey 22-May-13 02:42
Moderator Caution 285 Hoppy 20-May-13 17:57
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 271 Audrey 14-Jun-14 21:11
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 240 cladking 14-Jun-14 21:49
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 248 Scott Creighton 15-Jun-14 00:13
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 277 eyeofhorus33 15-Jun-14 00:58
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 249 cladking 15-Jun-14 01:12
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 235 Sirfiroth 15-Jun-14 19:09
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 277 cladking 15-Jun-14 20:40
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 264 Audrey 16-Jun-14 03:32
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 369 eyeofhorus33 16-Jun-14 18:38
Re: Audrey - How to photoshop a cartouche a la Vyse 259 Audrey 23-Jun-14 03:15
Australian Funeral 294 molder 15-Jun-14 05:03
Re: Australian Funeral 410 Audrey 16-Jun-14 03:56
Re: Australian Funeral 233 molder 16-Jun-14 12:06
Re: Australian Funeral 242 cladking 16-Jun-14 16:50
Re: Australian Funeral 220 Audrey 23-Jun-14 01:58
Re: Australian Funeral 263 molder 19-Jun-14 07:25
Re: Australian Funeral 236 molder 20-Jun-14 10:28
Re: Australian Funeral/North American Funeral 224 molder 22-Jun-14 06:53


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.