Oh.....so You* have to be experten.......before Sage's like yourself or
The Limestone God [Archae].....will accept a position.
My overall view that the mainstream science religion which includes your Egyptology has things wrong,
is because the evidence exists to support that.
I can rest my case via Electric Universe...and they can't even get the Sun right...I'll be damned if you run my life.
[Talbott was confided too by insiders that the Thermonuclear Sun model has failed.....failed!]
It does not require career or lifetime study to have discernment.
Recognizing that the walls blown out by Vyse's hench were not covered in the graffiti is telling.
then you notice the available space in these chambers,....and note the script is running off blocks onto other blocks.....
was period incorrect.....overtly large...
and ya....why would you need to scribble Royal cartouche's in such obscure locations?
You can use* the defence that the Egyptologist/linguistic types of the day were lacking in overall knowledge to account for why they did the
WT......you know what....when they first beheld the wonderous script.
First response is telling....
Sitchin in his chapter...Forging the Pharaohs name highlights numerous points,
which your side even has a few websites where the faithful take Sitchin apart for the win.
and then comments towards others opine about the alleged forgery,and their theories.....like Alan Alfords adoption Theory,
the one liner smear....
Can we seriously believe that Alford has a clue, when he comes out with something as silly as this?
Alford makes sense to me....as from my experience in construction projects and logistical prep,
the position from your side as to ALL* the building which the fabulous Khufu's pulled off,....gives me pause.
I do not see the required work force available for so much building projects.
and then...to have a military side...an administrative side....
the populace itself...with its primary need to sustain their own families needs.
its waay over the top on the perspective side.
what makes more common sense....is that Khufu adopted the already extant at Giza....and even did repairs.
Sneferu probably does the same in his day....
Egyptology says that the Bent pyramid was a corrective application to complete the project.
others note the definitions openly shown in the Bent Pyramids design.....that it was designed to be shown so...
as Carl Munck shows in posts I have linked to here at GHMB...
the Bent pyramid tells you exactly where it is Lat/Longitude....aligned to GP being the ancient prime meridian for the world grid of pyramid sites,temples,mounds and geo glyphs.
this suggests the over all template is outside Egypt's dynastic ability.
and points back to an ancient world culture circa 12,000 bc which initiated this building/grid design.
Dynastic Egypt adopts the extant and reasonably continues/works the understanding via their Religion ...which teaches personal Ascension.
Velikovsky indicated the understanding/perception of the Cosmos as requiring revision.
and he is correct in that.....proven right by hard science which the Magi of the mainstream now ignore...and continue their game.
ie.....the Sun is Nuclear....[when NASA's own Trace satellite data returns show the sun as having a hard surface with 2 layers of plasma flowing over it....the Sun even has raised mountain/ridge ranges on its hard surface]
[The Surface of the Sun - via google will get the readers to the data]
again....revision is a reasonable position,
I expect this to be the case for Egyptology,....and no....David Rohl's Hebrew centric version is still inadequate.
you can laugh...roll your eye's.....and cast one liner smears
the revisionist position will win the day....in time
when your side's Magi go to the dust......and loose their control grip.