Why is that.... it's been claimed to be wiped clean of all evidence of such other than the stone blocks, which are claimed to be advanced in part because of imaginary evidences like "millions of 2.5 ton blocks with tolerances of .010 inch"?
FYI- I like how you try to have the last word with me, "Archae", but then you have to sneak it into a reply to cladking. And here I though I could ignore you for a while... Anyway, three questions:
1.) Why should anyone expect to find any technological evidence from a civilization possibly 10,000 years old that isn't made of solid stone or solid gold?
2.) Where is the evidence for the building materials used on every other pyramid outside G1, G2, and G3?
3.) Do you not think that, at minimum, the core masonry is level on the tops and bottoms of the stone blocks to 0.01 inch?
And PS- Try to remain focused this time and stay on topic here. In other words, try not to keep beating your dead (hobby) horses about scratching granite with quartz or hundreds of two hundred ton stones from the Sphinx complex. Thanks in advance!
Post Edited (20-Jan-13 08:12)