cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Your stupid topographical map shows that the
> pyramids are really pyramid shaped mountains,
> shows quarries and topology that don't exist, and
> fails to show quarries that do exist.

"stupid" sounds like you are 8 years old. Sorry but the maps are accurate - however given that you constantly tell whoppers - how about showing us a topographical map you think is correct?

I mean that is what a scientist would do - so of course you haven't done that instead you said the topographical map was 'stupid'. Oh my

This is
> largely because the linguists who operate Giza
> can't be bothered to do things like measure the
> quarries and sample the material that now is in
> them. Your stupid map has features you ascribe to
> me but I reject the nonsense and have explained to
> you endlessly why I reject it.

We reject almost everything you've ever said because it's nonsense - the fact that you cannot place your funiculars in any logical place on the map is a clear failure of your ideas.

Your fault alone and I must say it is very amusing watching you try to crawl your way out of the hole you made - you really make yourself look like a fool not answering a question - that you should have answered five years ago.......tsk tsk.

Your post wasn't
> intended to find out what I believe was the
> location of the funicular routes or you would have
> asked for elaboration or clarification instead of
> changing the subject again.

The objective is to get you to show us how your ideas work on the ground - you know the real world - while your objective is to not demonstrate that you don't have clue about what you are talking about.
>
> I listed the six main lifting devices and then
> elaborated on one of them.

Great but the question to you was to draw them on the map - and you always tell us you answer questions....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Show us where they go.........pretty simple and its most amusing how hard you are trying to avoid doing this.

Why is that? What are you trying to hide?

>Rather than address this subject which you brought up for at least the
> tenth time you again launched into attacking me.

Says the guy who repeats the same claims literally thousands of times.....

....because we are discussing whether your ideas are valid - while you are doing all you can to avoid demonstrating you are wrong.

> Many people are here for a discussion (it is a
> DISCUSSION forum) but your principle motivation is
> obviously to shout down anyone who doesn't share
> your beliefs and to trash my threads.

No you want a 'discussion' where everyone agrees with you and doesn't ask you hard questions and request your research and evidence - you want a free run to pretend you are scientist.

Nope a discussion forum works two ways.

Were I as
> petty as you I could generate a list of the
> various threads you've trashed but then I have a
> higher estimation of the intelligence and
> awareness of the average reader than you do.

Yes and we do that 'trashing' by the outrageous method of asking you question - which you then throw fake tantrums to get out of answering - just like here - very mature.

I'm
> sure most of them can see your intent and strategy
> without my help.

Yeah its pretty evil of us trying to get a guy who makes wild claims to actually answer a question - man are we MEAN.
>
> I am impressed by your ability to usually make it
> an unpleasant experience to reply to your posts.
> But I will continue to do it only as it suits my
> needs.

In other words you want to continue to pretend to be a scientist without answering any questions.
>
> And I have to thank you for resurrecting this old
> thread at a very timely fashion even if you did
> trash it in the process. There have been some
> very valuable posts added.

Yes especially the ones showing your ideas are completely invalid, Manu schooled you brilliantly and showed - once again - that you know nothing about linguistics or the ancient Egyptian language.

So I'll continue to ask you to plot the imaginary funiculars on the stupid map.....lol