Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Now you are barefaced lying—that, or you
> have a
> > > conveniently defective memory: conditions not
> > > mutually exclusive, so that’s a non-exclusive
> > > or.
> >
> > > Can you present just one illustration now?
> > >
> > > Why do I even ask?
> >
> > I don't believe for a moment you are sincere.
> You aren't looking for answers but something new to
> > attack and ridicule so I'm not playing.
> >
> > If you want a response then I'll need to know
> what part of this sentence you don't understand; .

> > Then tell me what part you don't understand;
> >
> >
> [grahamhancock.com],
> 322352#msg-322352
> >
> > I can't understand this for you and you'll have
> to help me by saying exactly what's tripping you
> up.
> >
> >
> > It's like a balance scale.
> >
> > Do you even know what a "funicular" is or are
> you like the gadfly who won't look up the word
> > "metaphysics" in the ten years he's been
> arguing its definition?
>
> As I said, barefaced lying—and, imputing to me
> the game which actually you have chosen to play:
> pure projection, to go with your other
> rationalisations.
>
> There’s you claiming you’re clear, and
> everyone else telling you that you are not.
> Everyone else is wrong, of course—and this is
> how sincere you are about putting your clarity
> to the test and improving where necessary.
> Again we see avoidance and endless deferral.
>

Please speak for yourself. I like his way of thinking.
And please stop with this ad hominem nonsense. It seems you have an agenda since your discussing like this. Please keep the focus on the subjects at hand and that isn't the person.

Asking for proof is like rewriting history. So please come with some scientific arguments why Cladking is wrong.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 25-Nov-18 13:20 by Duketown.