Unless you present what I asked you I am not going any further with this.

1) Use whatever sentence you like, but it should contain a verb and know the original text source So we can look at the hieroglyphic text later.

2) The focus shall be the six dimensions of information carried by this verbal predicate. You have to address all six. If you believe ancient scribes did not encode one or the other, say so. Here they are again: Tense, Mood, State, Voice, Gender, Number....and while we are at it what about person (I, you, s/he...).

3) You must formulate your theory in a few brief sentences starting from here for example, where I can make out the beginnings of it:
[grahamhancock.com]

4) You must formulate a brief description of how you imagine Egyptian symbols were lined up to encode this information, i.e. not the lexical information of the text, but the information I ask in 2). I asked you this here: [grahamhancock.com]
For example, this description should make it clear what you consider parsed meaning and what is contextual.

We cannot go on unless I see this in place, wherever you like to put it. Put it all in one post please.
This is not to trick or set you up, no worries. You and I, and the other posters alike might find out a few surprising new things about the Egyptian language. To make this really good we have to first clearly define the expectations going in and then see how they are fulfilled or not.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 19-Nov-18 14:03 by Manu.