Manu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> One way you could respond: "Manu, my theory
> predicts that tense, state, mood, voice, gender,
> and number were all embedded in context by
> Egyptian scribes and not discretely marked with
> symbols as in parsing or discretely marked by
> changing the sequence of the words.

Manu, my understanding of Ancient Language suggests that context was generally set in the present tense and then meaning was expressed appropriately. Gender was based on what an object looked like. Perspective was always from the inside unless otherwise defined.

> 2) Given your prediction in 1), how do you think
> the original source text would change if a
> different state, mood, tense, voice, number or
> gender was intended. Give me an example using
> English words. No need to use hieroglyphs since
> you don't use them anyways.

This is difficult especially with a limitation on number of words.

Generally speaking there was only one way to say anything from a given perspective. One could change the perspective but if you express an idea in terms of "horuses" there was only one way to say it. You could always switch to "osiri", "serkets", or even "elvi" but you had one way to say it.

> This is as clear as I can make it. Maybe the
> others can help out. Any scientific theory must
> make predictions and when you test those
> predictions the result should fall in line of what
> is expected...or the theory must be altered/is
> falsified. No one can escape this method of
> knowledge formation.

My theory makes predictions about the reality prerentially to predictions about glyphs.

OK, I'll try a few.

Tefnut makes the earth high under the sky by means of her arms.

Osiris in his name of seker tows the earth by means of balance.

Imseti polishes the way that the swallows might fly.

Isis gives birth to osiris/ n in his name of horus of the east.

Maat causes the henu boat to go to and fro as geb mounts on high.

These should all mean exactly the same thing within a margin of error and in consideration of my pathetic understanding of the grammar. There are an infinite number of ways to say it just like in English but perspective and context are everything.

> By the way, I have not found the source of the
> object we are testing. Is it from Ani?
> Osiris...

Yes, I believe so. The "Hymn to Osiris".