cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hanslune Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Why that is what the AE said they were - why
> would
> > I doubt them. Far easier to doubt you since you
> > appear to not know what you are talking about.
>
> Nonsense!

Nonsense right back
>
> They called them "neters" and it's Egyptologists
> who believe the word means "gods".

Yeah those people who write stuff down to support their research and can actually read the language - you know the opposite of your method - read the English translation and make up new meaning
>
> > They did everything humans did.""
> >
> > How does that agree with your previous
> statement:
> >
> > ""1964d. as Isis said to Nun:
> > > 1965a. "I have given birth to him for thee; I
> > have
> > > deposited him for thee; 1 have certainly spit
> > him
> > > out for thee."
> > > 1965b. He has no feet; he has no arms,
> > > 1965c. and how shall he be assembled?
> > > 1966a. Then let this copper be brought ------
> > the
> > > ḥnw-boat --- with it.
> > > 1966b (N. 756). [Come ye] with him,
> nourished,
> > > with him in your arms, say they, the gods.
>
> "Neters" were anthropomorphized gods.

Which you say didn't exist because the AE (in your bizarre world) had no religion
>
> You should know these words and be able to
> understand them.
>
> I've never said anything to the contrary that that
> isis gives birth to horus: The counterweight
> lifts the stones from the quarry.

Yes you have I just posted it - are you going into full denial or are you saying your earlier or later self was telling whoppers?
>
> What is so hard about this?

The fact that you are avoiding the subject which I am clad to keep repeating for you

Here the contradiction again - it will be repeated until you actually answer the question:

""You say this:
1964d. as Isis said to Nun:
1965a. "I have given birth to him for thee; I have deposited him for thee; 1 have certainly spit him out for thee."
1965b. He has no feet; he has no arms,

The PT suggest two legs and two hands.""

So how does a non-existent God give birth - and why do you say the PT suggest two legs and two hands when in the past you've said the utterance means

[grahamhancock.com]

Isis is falling water lifting weight and nun is the phenomenon of water.

Isis the counterweight gives birth to horus by depositing horus the younger (the stone) on top of the pyramid using the weight of nun (water).

or

964d. as Isis said to Nun:
1965a. "I have given birth to him for thee; I have deposited him for thee; 1 have certainly spit him out for thee."
1965b. He has no feet; he has no arms,

Horus the stone is brought forth by his mother the counterweight with no arms and no feet.

1965c. and how shall he be assembled?
1966a. Then let this copper be brought ------ the ḥnw-boat --- with it.

The stone is assembled with the henu boat (funicular).

1966b (N. 756). [Come ye] with him, nourished, with him in your arms, say they, the gods.
1966c (N. 756). Behold, he is born.
1966d. Behold, he is assembled; behold he exists.

Horus is born.

Kinda difference meaning don't ya know - must be embarrassing to be caught faking it like this?

You have other different 'meanings' for utterance its almost like you just make stuff up willy nilly - why is that?

Or

So is Isis falling water or is she a being giving birth? Or is just AE incantation - magic rituals for religious purposes?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15-Nov-18 06:02 by Hanslune.