atul.seth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interestingly,
> this stance is aligned with the Darwinian
> principle of Evolution.

I often find myself arguing against the nonsense of darwinian evolution recently. The concept of "survival of the fittest" simply doesn't fit logic or the observed evidence. Change in species occurs suddenly and is caused by the sudden eradication by nature of large percentages of individuals which engage in specific behaviors. It could occur as Darwin suggested, but it just doesn't happen very often in the real world this way. This subject just keeps coming up in relation to ancient science or its derivatives.

> I agree we need the source technical materials or
> a clue to the logic of construction of the ancient
> original phonetic/sign alphabet and yes later
> commentaries/translations can only help us climb a
> few ramps.

The writing and alphabet closely parallel the language in many ways but, I believe, that the language contains what we need to know and writing is merely the means to learn it. While our understanding of the alphabet and glyphs are wholly incomplete it is generally sufficient to identify the individual words. The problem comes from our not knowing the referents to these words. For instance "henu boat" (3nw-boat) is probably a reasonably good translation but we believe the referent is a river going boat or a parade float depending on which Egyptologist you ask. In reality the individual who penned "3nw-boat" always meant the exact same thing and this was the name of the counterweight used to lift stones on the pyramid. It was the scientific term for the counterweight and had no other meaning at all. Obviously if we think it's a boat that the king took to get to heaven or a boat that brought his body to Giza we're going to misunderstand every single sentence that used this word. Every sentence contained a scientific word so we lack understanding of every sentence.

> Meditation is an ancient scientific rigorous
> technique to communicate with nature directly
> without use of sensory faculties. It is a means to
> understand and also source of complex knowledge.
> This is the reason a select group evolved having a
> corpus of complex knowledge and who had knowledge
> of this tool. It must be noted that meditation
> referred here is completely different from the
> commercially available “get well-stress
> buster-holistic life course’s”. The ancient
> technique is too demanding and very complicated
> for common people to practice. It is the
> culmination, the closing phase of Yoga and is yet
> much more in scope and depth. This site has
> excellent concise technical commentary on
> Patanjalis Yoga sutras
> here.

I believe there is precious little difference in humans one to another or in their abilities. We (especially modern language users) have simply gone off in every direction. We each have different strenghts and weaknesses and most people in the modern world are woefully underchallenged and held to remarkably low expectations. I often say we waste 97% of natural resources and 99% of human resources.

Anyone could be trained to meditate, though, obviously, you'll generally want to find young students rather than old dogs.

> I have doubts, for Modern science is yet to
> understand the nature of empty space and a precise
> standalone physical definition does not exist. A
> workaround mathematical definition
> “Space-Time” has been invented in relativity.
> Empty Space or Nu (?) is one of the main
> keys that unlock the door to ancient
> mysteries. Space is everything for without it,
> there is no existence.We are essentially 99.9%
> empty space.

I don't know. Modern science really doesn't know much more about gravity that the pyramid builders. "Space" only exists as an axiom. Certainly Einstein threw a monkey wrench into the quaint notion of euclidean geometry.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13-Oct-15 21:06 by cladking.