Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

MJT: The Granite Leaf is cemented in place, and therefore was/is immovable. Apart from this singular fatal clincher:
Quote

The top of the Leaf is 'a mere natural surface of the granite boulder out of which it was cut, utterly rough and irregular; and not materially broken away as it dips down deeply into the grooves and is there plastered over.' (Petrie 1883).

SC: Clincher? Fantasy land again. “Cemented in place”? What cement then did the ancient Egyptians use 2,500 years before the Romans invented it? Is that the same cement that they used to create their limestone blocks as proposed by Joseph Davidovitts? Or is it perhaps some modern Portland cement? Have you had this “cement” analysed?

Quote

”Nor was this most unique yet modest boss described and pictured by me with full correctness even in " Life and Work," I having made it much too high, too accurately rectangular at its lowest corner line, and too sharply and neatly defined all round : as I am enabled now to say positively, having been kindly furnished by my friend Mr. Waynman Dixon with a cast of it [the Granite Leaf boss] in Portland cement taken by him in the Great Pyramid last year (1872); and still another cast of it in plaster was obligingly sent to me by Dr. J. A. S. Grant, of Cairo, in 1874..” (Emphasis mine).Smythe, Piazzi, ‘Our Inheritance in the Great Pyramid’, p.207

SC: So do tell – what is this “cement” of yours that “cemented in place” the Granite Leaf? Is it some cement the ancient Egyptians used that we are hitherto unaware of or is it more likely to be the ‘modern’ Portland Cement used by Waynman Dixon on the Granite Leaf some 11 years before Petrie made his own observation? What do you think more likely?

If the Granite Leaf was intended to be immovable then it would have been inserted as a single granite slab and not one on top of the other. The fact that the upper slab – the Granite Leaf – has a raised boss and rebates at each side is a strong indicator that the upper slab was intended to be levered upwards in a manner probably not too dissimilar to this:



This was, afterall, the purpose of the boss, to provide an anchor point for ropes or levers, thus:



And we find them all over the pyramids. Just one example:



Quote

MJT: The top of the Leaf is 'a mere natural surface of the granite boulder out of which it was cut, utterly rough and irregular; and not materially broken away as it dips down deeply into the grooves and is there plastered over.' (Petrie 1883).

SC: Ah, so we’ve now gone from cement to plaster – plaster in the grooves. Such mortar was used as a lubricant to assist in the reduction of friction of a moving (stone) object – you should know that.

Quote

MJT: The level of the top of the Leaf from east end to west end varies by at least 7.75" – between the faces of the wainscots the difference is less at about 5.25”.

SC: So what.

Quote

MJT: The thickness of the Leaf (north-south) at its west end is 1” greater than at its east end.

SC: So what – my sash windows have a slightly wider gap at one end than the other but it doesn’t stop them from being raised and lowered.

Quote

MJT: The Boss on the north face of the Leaf's upper section projects only 0.94" to 1.1", and its edges slope slightly outward from front to back, and is, therefore, clearly inadequate as a point at which to place the upper end of a prop (note: Similar bosses exist in other parts of the Antechamber and inside the King’s Chamber).

SC: As stated above – boss’s were used as leverage and anchor points to move/raise stone. If anything this shows that the boss has become worn through extensive use.



Quote

MJT: There is only a 20" gap between the north wall of the Antechamber and the north face of the Leaf.

SC: Enough of a gap for a man to climb up and over the top whereupon the portcullis system would be fully at his mercy.

Quote

When fully raised the upper section of the Leaf would be free of its grooves and unstable - no explanation is offered as to how this would have been controlled adequately.

SC: Releasing the Granite Leaf from its grooves would probably be required from time to time in order to remove the build up of the mortar lubricant that had dried. Easily done with a copper chisel.

Quote

MJT: The grooves above the varied-in-level top of the Leaf are well-finished and clear of any signs of wear and have no traces of plaster or cement – this implies strongly that the Leaf was not raised once it was in place.

SC: So how do you think the wear came about below this level? The Granite Leaf does not have to go all the way to the ceiling to function.

Quote

MJT: The pilaster at the south face of the Leaf is nearly half the width of the other two pilasters (3” against 5.7”) – suggesting a matter of geometry not functionality.

SC: Functionality? In the Ante Chamber? Don't you mean 'symbolic' given that this is your view of the purpose of this chamber?

Quote

MJT: There are no signs of plaster or cement in the three grooves for the portcullis blocks.

SC: It might not have been required (there being slightly more of a gap in the grooves) or it might have been removed as part of the modern ‘restoration’ of the chamber.

Quote

MJT: There are no signs of wear in the top of the Antechamber’s north doorway similar to that seen in the doorway in the south wall of the Grand Gallery, and the doorway in the south wall of the Antechamber.

SC: Obviously less stress/friction occurring here.

Quote

MJT: There are no semi-circular hollows in the top of the east wainscot.

SC: Because they were obviously not required.

Quote

MJT: If the east end of the logs were cut and put into place as suggested (see most recent images posted), then the logs would drop in level W-E by about half the radius of the semi-circular hollows at about 4.4” over a distance of about 41”.

SC: There are all manner of possibilities that do not require semi-hollows in the east wainscot. Here’s another:



And I am sure many other possibilities could be imagined.

But yes, it’s a puzzle why the builders simply did not place semi-hollows in the east wainscot as, on the surface, this would seem the simplest thing to have done. But they didn't and there has to be a practical/logical reason why they did not. However, having semi-hollows on both sides of the chamber might result in the beams rotating – even if tightly jammed in - and this might be what the builders were trying to avoid.

Quote

MJT: If the Antechamber was intended to be a properly functioning portcullis system (for whatever reason), then surely care would have been taken to ensure it worked efficiently and easily.

The above indicates that it would not have done so.

SC: The above indicates nothing of the sort. If it indicates anything then I rather think its your penchant to avoid possible solutions and to present only problems. Not that presenting problems is a bad thing – it should be done. But not in isolation without possible solutions. Unless, of course, you do not wish – for whatever reason – for a solution to be found.

Quote

MJT: Then there is the fact that such a system was totally unnecessary, anyway. All that is required for Scott’s and Gary’s RVT was for a block of limestone measuring slightly less than 43.75” high by 41.25” wide by, say, 36” long, to be slid into the passage between the south wall of the Grand Gallery and the north wall of the Antechamber.

Fit handles to the GG end of the block so that it can be hauled out onto the Great Step quite easily as and when required. Smear a bit of plaster into the gaps between the sides of the doorway and the block and BINGO, one efficient and easy to use re-sealable passage.

SC: Why secure the chamber any more than is necessary? They are not trying to prevent entry, merely restrict airflow. The Portcullis system was already there serving its primary function (probably as a counter-weight system) so it could be utilised to adequately seal the chamber (from air) without recourse to anything else. And that is what was done. And having sealed the chamber (from air) in this manner, allowed easy access to it later which is consistent with the RVT but is entirely contradictory with the tomb theory.

Quote

MJT: Another issue is the fact that it is wrong to view the Antechamber in isolation.

SC: You mean like the King’s Chamber is a Decoy so the Ante Chamber is merely symbolic? Is that the kind of isolation you are talking about?

Quote

MJT: However, I see that Scott and others have tried to link the Antechamber to the Grand Gallery as an integral part of a system to seal the Ascending Passage with three (or more?) stone blocks, and or drag large granite beams up to the King’s Chamber. However, the problems with the Granite Leaf, etc., have an adverse effect on this.

SC: I disagree.

Quote

MJT: Then there is the problem with the rectangular holes in the tops of the two GG ramps. Broadly, there are two lengths of hole - described usually as long and short - and they are all irregular in length and their ends are not all positioned diametrically opposite each other (see Piazzi Smyth 1867). The depths of these holes are also varied (this could be down to a natural accumulation of detritus over the millennia). Any beams placed across the Gallery would be skewed N-S by up to 2”, which would cause problems with the granite plugs that were supposedly stored in the Gallery.

SC: Agreed. But what exactly has this to do with the price of fish? In my opinion, and I know you agree, the granite plugs of the Ascending Passage were built in-situ.

Quote

MJT: The groove in the east and west walls of the GG is very roughly cut and much broken away from along its edges. The groove is only about 1” deep and is close to the bottom edge of a corbel. It could not have been used to support a platform for people to walk along, as some folk have suggested.

SC: Some folk may have – I haven’t.

Quote

MJT: At least one point on the Ascending Passage floor is fractionally narrower than one of the granite plugs at its lower end, suggesting that the blocks were built in situ (see M & R).

SC: Agreed.

Quote

MJT: I hope this gives you (and perhaps others here) a better idea of why Scott’s Antechamber hypothesis is, IMO, fatally flawed and does not work.

SC: And I hope my rebuttal shows that you are somewhat over-stating your case.

SC



Post Edited (30-Jun-12 16:48)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 1149 Scott Creighton 20-Jun-12 15:42
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 279 Archae Solenhofen 20-Jun-12 16:36
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 460 LonelyAngel 25-Jun-12 19:58
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 366 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jun-12 20:36
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 402 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 21:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 453 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jun-12 17:42
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 518 Scott Creighton 26-Jun-12 18:24
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 445 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jun-12 18:53
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 485 Scott Creighton 26-Jun-12 19:03
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 439 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jun-12 19:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 456 Scott Creighton 26-Jun-12 22:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 466 cladking 25-Jun-12 22:36
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 473 LonelyAngel 26-Jun-12 20:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 434 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jun-12 21:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 439 LonelyAngel 26-Jun-12 22:04
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 495 Archae Solenhofen 26-Jun-12 22:10
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 472 LonelyAngel 26-Jun-12 22:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 423 Scott Creighton 26-Jun-12 22:41
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 484 LonelyAngel 26-Jun-12 23:23
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 470 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jun-12 04:24
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 434 Scott Creighton 27-Jun-12 10:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 448 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jun-12 12:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 485 Scott Creighton 27-Jun-12 13:10
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 458 Archae Solenhofen 27-Jun-12 14:03
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 474 Scott Creighton 27-Jun-12 15:02
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 441 cladking 26-Jun-12 22:51
Did you have a direct question? 471 Warwick 09-Jul-12 23:13
Re: Did you have a direct question? 472 LonelyAngel 10-Jul-12 20:40
Re: Did you have a direct question? 378 cladking 11-Jul-12 00:15
Re: Did you have a direct question? 460 Warwick 14-Aug-12 19:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 506 billbaty 20-Jun-12 17:39
The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 438 cladking 20-Jun-12 19:18
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 471 Scott Creighton 20-Jun-12 23:50
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 478 Thanos5150 21-Jun-12 01:07
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 485 billbaty 21-Jun-12 03:24
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 452 Thanos5150 21-Jun-12 03:44
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 515 billbaty 21-Jun-12 04:43
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 435 Thanos5150 22-Jun-12 06:56
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 454 MJT 22-Jun-12 08:15
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 475 paxton 22-Jun-12 10:18
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 326 MJT 23-Jun-12 03:29
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 442 Chris Jordan 23-Jun-12 09:12
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 457 MJT 23-Jun-12 10:41
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 390 paxton 24-Jun-12 15:22
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 430 Chris Jordan 24-Jun-12 18:01
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 452 MJT 24-Jun-12 18:59
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 386 Chris Jordan 24-Jun-12 19:47
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 468 MJT 25-Jun-12 00:21
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 479 Chris Jordan 26-Jun-12 14:48
Re: The tomb theory is NOT dead; long live the spirit of the king. 394 MJT 26-Jun-12 18:00
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 447 paxton 26-Jun-12 21:58
Re: The dumb theory is dead; long live the water king. 423 Nejc 26-Jun-12 22:46
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 503 Chris Jordan 27-Jun-12 10:28
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 457 paxton 27-Jun-12 22:02
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 487 Chris Jordan 28-Jun-12 09:32
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the water king. 513 paxton 29-Jun-12 10:46
Re: The tomb theory is dead; long live the king. 490 Thanos5150 22-Jun-12 17:54
Re: The tomb theory is not dead - some folk just wish it was... 408 MJT 22-Jun-12 19:01
Re: The tomb theory is not dead - some folk just wish it was... 490 Thanos5150 22-Jun-12 20:00
Re: The tomb theory is not dead - some folk just wish it was... 402 MJT 23-Jun-12 02:57
Re: The tomb theory is not dead - some folk just wish it was... 524 Thanos5150 23-Jun-12 22:45
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 453 Audrey 20-Jun-12 20:06
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 365 Chris Jordan 20-Jun-12 20:19
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 449 MJT 20-Jun-12 22:04
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 439 Scott Creighton 20-Jun-12 22:22
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 438 MJT 20-Jun-12 22:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 435 Scott Creighton 20-Jun-12 22:52
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 452 MJT 21-Jun-12 00:09
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 431 Sirfiroth 21-Jun-12 00:40
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 450 MJT 21-Jun-12 01:09
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 356 Sirfiroth 21-Jun-12 04:31
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 459 MJT 21-Jun-12 08:33
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 465 lobo-hotei 28-Jun-12 17:34
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 272 MJT 28-Jun-12 18:52
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 423 Scott Creighton 28-Jun-12 22:30
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 352 MJT 29-Jun-12 00:38
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 479 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 01:13
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 437 MJT 29-Jun-12 11:14
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 447 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 11:57
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 399 MJT 29-Jun-12 13:09
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 477 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 13:33
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 464 MJT 29-Jun-12 18:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 441 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 19:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 468 lobo-hotei 29-Jun-12 20:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 490 MJT 29-Jun-12 21:59
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 487 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 22:30
Re: Ante Chamber Fails To Disprove Tomb Theory 418 MJT 30-Jun-12 14:25
Re: Ante Chamber Fails To Disprove Tomb Theory 494 Scott Creighton 30-Jun-12 16:38
Proof the pyramid was not a tomb. 488 cladking 29-Jun-12 22:05
Re: Proof the pyramid was not a tomb. 427 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 22:33
Re: Proof the pyramid was not a tomb. 451 cladking 30-Jun-12 02:00
Re: Proof the pyramid was not a tomb. 455 MJT 29-Jun-12 22:37
Re: Proof the pyramid was not a tomb. 415 cladking 30-Jun-12 01:59
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 420 LonelyAngel 30-Jun-12 00:11
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 437 MJT 30-Jun-12 13:23
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 533 Scott Creighton 30-Jun-12 16:33
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 498 paxton 30-Jun-12 18:07
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 484 Scott Creighton 30-Jun-12 18:38
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 503 paxton 02-Jul-12 10:41
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 471 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-12 11:49
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 443 lobo-hotei 30-Jun-12 21:30
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 454 MJT 01-Jul-12 00:07
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 465 MJT 30-Jun-12 23:42
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 421 Scott Creighton 01-Jul-12 15:05
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 408 lobo-hotei 03-Jul-12 19:52
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 434 LonelyAngel 10-Jul-12 22:54
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 495 lobo-hotei 28-Jun-12 17:31
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 466 Scott Creighton 21-Jun-12 10:55
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 457 MJT 21-Jun-12 12:12
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 477 MJT 23-Jun-12 12:06
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 389 Nejc 24-Jun-12 13:48
Further Thoughts.... 403 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 10:37
Re: Further Thoughts.... 488 cladking 22-Jun-12 16:16
Re: Further Thoughts.... 412 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 16:29
Re: Further Thoughts.... 490 eyeofhorus33 22-Jun-12 16:19
Re: Further Thoughts.... 427 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 16:32
Re: Further Thoughts.... 380 MJT 22-Jun-12 19:35
Re: Further Thoughts.... 474 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 20:18
Re: Further Thoughts.... 428 MJT 22-Jun-12 23:30
Re: Further Thoughts.... 449 eohpyratech 23-Jun-12 02:13
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 442 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 17:17
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 429 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 17:35
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 334 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 17:47
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 309 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 17:49
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 304 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 18:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 453 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 18:14
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 404 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 18:28
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 462 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 18:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 477 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 18:54
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 412 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 19:13
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 447 Archae Solenhofen 22-Jun-12 19:40
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 496 Scott Creighton 22-Jun-12 20:02
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 448 MJT 23-Jun-12 03:12
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 453 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 11:58
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 417 MJT 23-Jun-12 12:41
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 441 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 13:26
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 426 cladking 23-Jun-12 15:55
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 414 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jun-12 15:40
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 331 eohpyratech 23-Jun-12 12:31
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 419 cladking 23-Jun-12 15:59
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 378 eohpyratech 24-Jun-12 16:01
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 415 cladking 22-Jun-12 19:59
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 421 drew 23-Jun-12 00:30
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 462 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 12:19
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 434 MJT 23-Jun-12 12:57
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 416 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 13:52
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 308 drew 23-Jun-12 14:45
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 437 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 17:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 333 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jun-12 17:43
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 400 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 17:57
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 436 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jun-12 18:13
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 381 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 18:23
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 315 Archae Solenhofen 23-Jun-12 18:42
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 404 Scott Creighton 23-Jun-12 19:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 457 eyeofhorus33 24-Jun-12 18:21
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 435 Scott Creighton 24-Jun-12 19:07
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 397 eyeofhorus33 24-Jun-12 19:28
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 423 eyeofhorus33 24-Jun-12 19:51
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 413 Scott Creighton 24-Jun-12 23:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 445 Sirfiroth 24-Jun-12 23:24
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? - NO! 362 MJT 25-Jun-12 00:05
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 441 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 00:26
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 415 Archae Solenhofen 25-Jun-12 18:23
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 396 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 00:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 349 drew 25-Jun-12 11:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 420 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 15:01
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 421 drew 25-Jun-12 22:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 416 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 22:53
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 420 drew 25-Jun-12 23:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 428 Scott Creighton 26-Jun-12 00:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 416 Sirfiroth 25-Jun-12 14:34
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 373 Scott Creighton 25-Jun-12 18:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 449 drew 23-Jun-12 20:28
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 439 Sirfiroth 23-Jun-12 21:50
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 448 cladking 23-Jun-12 21:59
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 297 Scott Creighton 24-Jun-12 01:34
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 402 drew 06-Jul-12 17:14
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 414 MJT 06-Jul-12 22:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 415 drew 06-Jul-12 23:57
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 420 MJT 07-Jul-12 01:27
Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 410 Sirfiroth 07-Jul-12 06:54
Re: Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 464 MJT 07-Jul-12 10:44
Re: Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 393 Sirfiroth 07-Jul-12 17:52
Re: Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 429 MJT 07-Jul-12 18:40
Re: Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 428 Sirfiroth 07-Jul-12 23:17
Re: Some Recorded Floods of Antiquity! 379 MJT 08-Jul-12 00:45
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 414 drew 07-Jul-12 14:31
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 401 MJT 07-Jul-12 18:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 428 drew 07-Jul-12 21:41
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 437 MJT 08-Jul-12 00:36
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 248 drew 08-Jul-12 14:18
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 416 MJT 09-Jul-12 23:54
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 398 cladking 10-Jul-12 00:35
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 391 Audrey 10-Jul-12 04:20
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 429 Sirfiroth 10-Jul-12 04:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 424 Audrey 10-Jul-12 04:57
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 441 cladking 10-Jul-12 04:54
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 402 Audrey 10-Jul-12 05:06
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 458 cladking 10-Jul-12 05:32
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 378 MJT 10-Jul-12 11:27
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 434 cladking 10-Jul-12 15:08
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 310 MJT 10-Jul-12 18:15
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 426 cladking 10-Jul-12 18:54
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 413 MJT 10-Jul-12 22:42
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 406 Audrey 11-Jul-12 02:28
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 417 drew 10-Jul-12 15:49
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 404 Audrey 11-Jul-12 02:37
Re: Sothic cycle 419 drew 11-Jul-12 17:53
Re: Sothic cycle 452 Scott Creighton 11-Jul-12 23:42
Re: Sothic cycle 413 drew 12-Jul-12 01:38
Re: Sothic cycle 371 drew 12-Jul-12 05:29
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 398 Scott Creighton 09-Jul-12 14:04
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 392 Freelancer62 27-Jun-12 13:19
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 749 Scott Creighton 29-Jun-12 11:49
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 411 drew 29-Jun-12 12:37
Re: Ante Chamber Disproves Tomb Theory? 452 Sirfiroth 29-Jun-12 14:35


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.