MJT: I did think that my mentioning that the points I
> raised about the Antechamber could go against the 'Tomb
> Theory', too, would encourage a positive response, but it looks
> like I was wrong.
> SC: What more is there to say? We agree - the Ante Chamber, for
> various reasons, contradicts the tomb theory. There was no need
> to say any more. 'Nuff said.
Please note how Scott distorts the situation quite deliberately.
The fact remains that his hypothesis on the Antechamber simply does not and cannot work.
I have provided Scott with all the details involved, yet he continues to ignore every one of them.
Because he knows his hypothesis is wrong, but lacks the decency of character to admit it.
If Scott thinks otherwise then let's see him present his arguements here and now against the points I raised with regard to his Antechamber hypothesis in relation to his Seed Bank theory.
Over to you, Scott ...
So few answers - and not one of them mine.