> SC:Except... it could NEVER have functioned as an effective
> tomb for an AE king. Period.
> Burying a king in such a nameless edifice would have rendered
> it soulless and, as such, would have confined the king to
> eternal oblivion.
This is based solely on the various translations and interpretations of the Pyramid Texts, the earliest of which post-date Giza by around 130 years.
How can you be so sure that this 'nameless edifice' problem, for want of a better term, was around in Khufu's time?
So few answers - and not one of them mine.