> MJT wrote: It is a demonstrable fact that your Antechamber
> hypothesis simply does not work.
> MJ, you evidently will just have to live with your ignorance!
> BTW, simply saying it does not work only demonstrates your
> ignorance of the subject matter!
I did not and will not settle for simply saying Scott's hypothesis does not work.
I put forward several good reasons why it doesn't work, and I am well prepared to elaborate on any one of them if asked to do so.
Now, is there any prospect of you posting in some detail what you feel is actually wrong with the points I raised?
So few answers - and not one of them mine.