> Sure, I can let you know, but I probably won't ask. I'm just
> not interested in that.
> To me, the strength of JMJ's work on 2012 rests in totally
> objective factors,
> the celestial correlations and the monuments which 'allegedly'
> support his
> galactic alignment theory. That has nothing to do with altered
> states of con-
> sciousness, the subjective factor.
OK, no problem.