and better yet..why not rebut my contribution to the topic
WE ALL KNOW that you do not think ramps were employed
you really don't have to repeat it over and over and over
You've obviously put a lot of thought into the logistics..surely you have done so from the direction of trying to make it work?
This is what Scott is looking for.
Scott also has his own theories but has learned that simply having a theory contrary to another isn't enough to dispute that other. Some might say that a thread such as this is a fishing expedition. So what??
if what he is fishing for in any way helps us all to a better appreciation of the questions at hand..then I applaud him for doing so.
What are you doing?
What is your substantive contribution to Scott's thread?
these are very important questions, that need to be addressed..
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."
Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019