sher wrote:

> Well I don't like to be discredited,..and you started all
> this,..or have you forgotten your remark:
>
> "Is that why you mistook images of the deceased for giants in
> other threads because you have such a good understanding ?"

Yes you see genii and giants were others see common Old Kingdom images of the tomb owner receiving offerings etc. The tomb owner is often shown bigger that other people in his tomb. They are not therefore giants. Identifying them as giants and genii does not give us confidence that you understand the iconography of the Giza necropolis. Which would be alright except you insist that you are an expert.

> So as I have told you,..I have not mistook any images,..could
> you tell me why you think I mistook. I have now shown you proof
> of a megalith wall built out of unhewn boulders of random sizes
> some weighing more than 5 tons,..with little half ton boulders
> fitted in the grooves,..which has to be be built by
> hand,..impossible to move and fit these stones with
> mechanization. Instead of giving me an intellegent well studied
> response, all you can say is that they pushed and rolled them.
> So honestly I am really wasting my time discussing this matter
> with you.

Yes I told I thought the pyramids were built by manual labor. That is a reasonable response.

> Like I said and proved to you,..these pits on the eastern face
> of the great Pyramid were found empty with no boats in them.
> Your last intellegent response is that they were excavated to
> put in barges not boats. My response is that there were no
> barges of this design and size in the 4th dynasty,..and if
> there was to prove it. So this is not a game,..this is a quest
> to prove a mysterious Necropolis that is not of our reality.

No. You asked me what it looked like to me. I said it looked like
a boat shape. You asked again I said [maybe] a barge shape.
And I still think it looks like pits for boats.
And they even found boats in other pits around the pyramid. IMHO this is no great mystery. But you must have a different idea? And we are waiting for your answer. I have given mime.


>
>
> If they were barges,...wouldn't they all be of the same design
> and size. They are all of different measurements and
> sizes,...so logically they cannot be boats and barges then.

That makes no sense to me. Of course they could be different sizes and shapes just like boats are different sizes and shapes depending on what they are used for.


>The
> above image is the smallest of the pits,..and much smaller to.
> Take your time and stare at the image well,..look at the bottom
> or the ground of the pit with its outline,...do you see a boat
> or a figure?

I see a pit for a boat. I have answered your questions. It is past time that you say what you think the pits were used for and how big the object was that went in there. And if they have ever found the same object elsewhere at Giza or in Egypt. Context is everything.