Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 437 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 364 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 345 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 385 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 314 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 323 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 291 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 347 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 243 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 306 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 433 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 320 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 286 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 339 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 292 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 282 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 274 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 307 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 315 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 296 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 326 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 316 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 273 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 283 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 290 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 340 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 353 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 322 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 294 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 288 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 297 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 363 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 312 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 374 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 311 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 361 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 297 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 263 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.