Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 498 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 361 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 346 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 449 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 490 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 375 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 447 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 417 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 382 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 362 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 503 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 339 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 402 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 368 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 349 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 447 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 344 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 355 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 396 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 346 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 355 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 323 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 355 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 388 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 419 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 386 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 389 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 408 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 375 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 345 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 388 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 450 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 378 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 414 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 357 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 276 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 334 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 553 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 350 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 322 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 436 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 378 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 358 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 325 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 310 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 306 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 342 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 405 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 457 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 344 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 300 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 314 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 327 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 465 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 383 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 352 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 323 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 318 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 330 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 394 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 342 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 405 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 343 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 393 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 383 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 456 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 347 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 375 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.