Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 475 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 384 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 420 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 380 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 450 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 392 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 358 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 296 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 381 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 333 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 312 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 376 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 376 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 376 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 397 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 365 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 377 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 380 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 366 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 394 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 263 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 323 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 495 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 338 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 310 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 375 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 367 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 345 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 312 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 299 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 295 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 346 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 317 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 391 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 334 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 290 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 303 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 318 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 399 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 372 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 340 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 312 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 308 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 318 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 381 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 331 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 394 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 381 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 372 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 398 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.