Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 448 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 276 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 283 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 370 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 399 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 377 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 345 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 319 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 298 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 359 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 284 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 380 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 310 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 323 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 368 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 284 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 248 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 310 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 446 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 295 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 349 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 297 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 286 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 281 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 315 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 320 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 301 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 338 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 323 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 276 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 289 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 299 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 353 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 359 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 327 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 298 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 295 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 304 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 367 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 317 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 380 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 317 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 297 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 366 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 359 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 323 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.