Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> "I agree with orthodox beliefs that the GP could represent the
> Ahk ..a union of Ba & Ka."
>
> that is but one possible explanation..for Egyptology the
> question why Pyramids is still very much under debate
>
> any number of Books contain firm conclusions,,but I think
> you'll find they all carry the caveat of ttbomk or imho
>
> Egyptology as a whole does not study pyramid building via the
> GP only..but viathe entire observable pattern of developement
> of funerary arangements, beliefs , art and technology
>
> How does your theory stack up against the Step of Netjerikhet

> or the enclosures of his Father..Khasekhemwy??
>
> What of the make up of the temples themselves
>
> and why amidst all this symmetry do the causeways not proceed
> straight from the center of each enclosure
>
> the questions that can be asked are indeed endless
>

I'll put in the time to find out. please understand i entered this realm to debunk some of the wild theories out there...even my own when ifirst started. And, do not take any offense to this, however I have had to prove the AE built the structure within my re-search before i was going to exhaust all avenues of re-search strictly on the AE; since what others were writing conveyed there was some ancient culture prior that built the GP.
I believe there is enough correlating data to begin to solidfy and show the AE as the builders.
...obviously, your probably thinking the relieving chamber cartouches and shaft chisel marks were enough.... but, i had to put in the time and see for myself...

there are two things i would like to see from orthodox to put this to bed.

Scott Creighton brought up an interesting observation regarding a long piece of lumber within the GP that appears would have to have been placed during construction. If true... can't we carbon date it and be done with it.
Second if the first bares zero fruit, wouldbe to test the gypsum within the interior of the structure. The exterior testing dates showing a wide range of some 400+ years is fuel to make the case that it was a repair job versus part of the initial construction.

I believe those two points could end the squabble.

Furthermore, I still think there exists the possibility that we have misinterpreted some of the writings and or hieroglyphs etc. But, I will put in the time to expand my background knowledge of the actual culture prior to any speculation.

thank you for your time Warwick. much appreciated.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 422 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 265 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 270 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 297 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 368 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 365 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 304 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 310 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 283 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 310 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 300 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 300 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 290 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 281 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 274 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 310 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 235 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 297 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 404 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 312 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 280 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 292 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 329 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 317 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 285 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 275 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 263 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 298 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 307 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 289 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 314 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 309 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 263 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 274 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 284 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 323 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 346 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 316 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 284 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 284 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 285 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 356 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 304 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 368 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 303 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 349 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 257 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.