when I am dealing with science I am scientific..when I am dealing with History I am logical

as far as my opiniion being worth anything

even a completely misguided opinion is indicative of something, and as such beneficial overall

or are we just to offer opinions that agree with other?

as far as not repsonding

Have you asked me about stoneworking techniques?

Have you asked me about Old Kingdom Funerary arrangements?

Have you asked me about AE beliefs?

Have we discussed the evolution from Nomal WarLord to King of the Lands of the Sedge and the Bee??

do you EVER rely on the expertise/specialty of other in other fields of study

I do

and I believe that every maths based Gizamid theory is mathematically correct to whatever degree the theorist assures me.

then I ask the questions, or suggest the contradictions that someone who sincerely wishes to understand history WANTS to address

Ironically now that I reread the above..that's about as close to the scientific method that a Historian can get

I'm sorry to be such a disappointment to you


Warwick