Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<<<<> How have I insulted you??
>
> The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the
> content posted.
>
> > If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> > one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> > Information
> >
> > what was I to conclude?
>
> Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the
> character with one statement..
> However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem
> data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
>
> for Pete's sake!!!

the comment "what was i to conclude" informs us...that a "conclusion" has been reached. I'm pointing out that you have displayed a conflict of methodolgy in that enables you to make "conclusions" regarding the "individual" presenting.... however, is not applied for the actual data being presented.

For Pete's sake is right!

>
> I offered sources of info to Titus
>
> You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info

No, I simply did not convey my thoughts on the matter clearly enough for you to gauge what i was intending....
>
> "i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
>
> what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for
> Titus

>see above. systems analysts ..."Analyze" everything.

>
> "of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
>
> "I am a system analyst."

What is your point? A system Analyst qualifies as an expert opinion on the topic of AE?

> I trust that you are convinced that your observations are
> correct..

I believe the math is correct, yes. And, given that the math was extracted via ancient rhinds, objects,art and structures all linked... then it appears to convey intention..
hence, why I am detrmined to obtain feedback.

> now can you place your observations with a cultural context or
> not??

Is not binding the EMP/RMP with the GP sufficient enough? This relates to the mathematical engineering processes...not the "meaning" behind the GP. the knew math... building a structure of that magnitude wouldrequire math... we find correlating data in the units of both structure and rhind.

>
> "You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws
> in character."
>
> I have done nothing of the sort
>
> I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character

okay.

> I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now
> you have told me I am misguided for doing so

not so... the twisted interpretations have to stop. Isimply stated that it would be irresponsible to take anyones word versus doing the work yourself to test it.
>
> If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward
> maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to
> discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians

Fortunately for you, the AE had a simpler system of math and only requires visual understanding versus pages of mathematical calculations... :)
ofcourse they both have to be joined to prove the theorems.

this line of discussion appears unproductive and is caught in a cyclic spin.
please either review the data and offer what ever you feel ...
Or, simply go the other direction. I cannot waste anymore time here.

Thanks for "trying"....


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 437 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 364 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 345 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 385 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 314 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 323 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 291 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 347 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 243 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 306 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 433 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 320 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 286 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 339 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 292 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 282 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 273 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 307 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 315 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 296 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 326 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 315 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 273 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 282 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 290 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 340 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 353 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 322 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 294 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 288 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 297 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 363 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 312 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 374 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 311 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 361 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 297 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 263 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.