Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<<<<> How have I insulted you??
>
> The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the
> content posted.
>
> > If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> > one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> > Information
> >
> > what was I to conclude?
>
> Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the
> character with one statement..
> However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem
> data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
>
> for Pete's sake!!!

the comment "what was i to conclude" informs us...that a "conclusion" has been reached. I'm pointing out that you have displayed a conflict of methodolgy in that enables you to make "conclusions" regarding the "individual" presenting.... however, is not applied for the actual data being presented.

For Pete's sake is right!

>
> I offered sources of info to Titus
>
> You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info

No, I simply did not convey my thoughts on the matter clearly enough for you to gauge what i was intending....
>
> "i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
>
> what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for
> Titus

>see above. systems analysts ..."Analyze" everything.

>
> "of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
>
> "I am a system analyst."

What is your point? A system Analyst qualifies as an expert opinion on the topic of AE?

> I trust that you are convinced that your observations are
> correct..

I believe the math is correct, yes. And, given that the math was extracted via ancient rhinds, objects,art and structures all linked... then it appears to convey intention..
hence, why I am detrmined to obtain feedback.

> now can you place your observations with a cultural context or
> not??

Is not binding the EMP/RMP with the GP sufficient enough? This relates to the mathematical engineering processes...not the "meaning" behind the GP. the knew math... building a structure of that magnitude wouldrequire math... we find correlating data in the units of both structure and rhind.

>
> "You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws
> in character."
>
> I have done nothing of the sort
>
> I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character

okay.

> I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now
> you have told me I am misguided for doing so

not so... the twisted interpretations have to stop. Isimply stated that it would be irresponsible to take anyones word versus doing the work yourself to test it.
>
> If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward
> maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to
> discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians

Fortunately for you, the AE had a simpler system of math and only requires visual understanding versus pages of mathematical calculations... :)
ofcourse they both have to be joined to prove the theorems.

this line of discussion appears unproductive and is caught in a cyclic spin.
please either review the data and offer what ever you feel ...
Or, simply go the other direction. I cannot waste anymore time here.

Thanks for "trying"....


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 475 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 384 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 420 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 380 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 450 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 392 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 358 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 296 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 381 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 333 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 312 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 376 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 376 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 375 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 397 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 365 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 335 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 377 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 380 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 366 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 394 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 263 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 323 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 495 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 338 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 310 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 375 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 367 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 345 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 312 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 299 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 294 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 346 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 317 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 391 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 334 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 290 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 302 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 318 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 399 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 372 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 340 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 312 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 308 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 318 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 381 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 331 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 394 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 330 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 381 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 372 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 398 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.