Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<<<<> How have I insulted you??
>
> The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the
> content posted.
>
> > If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> > one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> > Information
> >
> > what was I to conclude?
>
> Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the
> character with one statement..
> However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem
> data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
>
> for Pete's sake!!!

the comment "what was i to conclude" informs us...that a "conclusion" has been reached. I'm pointing out that you have displayed a conflict of methodolgy in that enables you to make "conclusions" regarding the "individual" presenting.... however, is not applied for the actual data being presented.

For Pete's sake is right!

>
> I offered sources of info to Titus
>
> You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info

No, I simply did not convey my thoughts on the matter clearly enough for you to gauge what i was intending....
>
> "i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
>
> what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for
> Titus

>see above. systems analysts ..."Analyze" everything.

>
> "of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
>
> "I am a system analyst."

What is your point? A system Analyst qualifies as an expert opinion on the topic of AE?

> I trust that you are convinced that your observations are
> correct..

I believe the math is correct, yes. And, given that the math was extracted via ancient rhinds, objects,art and structures all linked... then it appears to convey intention..
hence, why I am detrmined to obtain feedback.

> now can you place your observations with a cultural context or
> not??

Is not binding the EMP/RMP with the GP sufficient enough? This relates to the mathematical engineering processes...not the "meaning" behind the GP. the knew math... building a structure of that magnitude wouldrequire math... we find correlating data in the units of both structure and rhind.

>
> "You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws
> in character."
>
> I have done nothing of the sort
>
> I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character

okay.

> I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now
> you have told me I am misguided for doing so

not so... the twisted interpretations have to stop. Isimply stated that it would be irresponsible to take anyones word versus doing the work yourself to test it.
>
> If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward
> maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to
> discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians

Fortunately for you, the AE had a simpler system of math and only requires visual understanding versus pages of mathematical calculations... :)
ofcourse they both have to be joined to prove the theorems.

this line of discussion appears unproductive and is caught in a cyclic spin.
please either review the data and offer what ever you feel ...
Or, simply go the other direction. I cannot waste anymore time here.

Thanks for "trying"....


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 422 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 320 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 265 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 270 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 278 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 299 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 369 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 365 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 285 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 247 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 266 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 304 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 302 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 310 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 284 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 296 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 300 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 363 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 295 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 279 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 300 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 290 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 282 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 311 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 235 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 297 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 405 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 313 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 281 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 292 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 330 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 317 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 285 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 276 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 263 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 299 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 308 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 290 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 314 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 309 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 263 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 274 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 284 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 324 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 346 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 317 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 285 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 284 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 286 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 357 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 305 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 368 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 303 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 350 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 289 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 289 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 312 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 333 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 258 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.