Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<<<<> How have I insulted you??
>
> The comment was uncalled for and simply a distraction to the
> content posted.
>
> > If you are referring to my comment about reading..you are the
> > one that stated that the Library was not a good source of
> > Information
> >
> > what was I to conclude?
>
> Your giving examples of coming to a conclusion against the
> character with one statement..
> However, your against coming to conclusion given solid theorem
> data extracted from the ancients??>>>>
>
> for Pete's sake!!!

the comment "what was i to conclude" informs us...that a "conclusion" has been reached. I'm pointing out that you have displayed a conflict of methodolgy in that enables you to make "conclusions" regarding the "individual" presenting.... however, is not applied for the actual data being presented.

For Pete's sake is right!

>
> I offered sources of info to Titus
>
> You THREW OUT the Library as a source of info

No, I simply did not convey my thoughts on the matter clearly enough for you to gauge what i was intending....
>
> "i see conflict in methodology. sorry."
>
> what methodology?? WE are discussing sources of review for
> Titus

>see above. systems analysts ..."Analyze" everything.

>
> "of course not.... but, where did i state an "expert" opinion?"
>
> "I am a system analyst."

What is your point? A system Analyst qualifies as an expert opinion on the topic of AE?

> I trust that you are convinced that your observations are
> correct..

I believe the math is correct, yes. And, given that the math was extracted via ancient rhinds, objects,art and structures all linked... then it appears to convey intention..
hence, why I am detrmined to obtain feedback.

> now can you place your observations with a cultural context or
> not??

Is not binding the EMP/RMP with the GP sufficient enough? This relates to the mathematical engineering processes...not the "meaning" behind the GP. the knew math... building a structure of that magnitude wouldrequire math... we find correlating data in the units of both structure and rhind.

>
> "You have answered the question... you've pointed out my flaws
> in character."
>
> I have done nothing of the sort
>
> I have absolutely no ideas pertaining to your character

okay.

> I assumed that you were honest in your calculations,,,but now
> you have told me I am misguided for doing so

not so... the twisted interpretations have to stop. Isimply stated that it would be irresponsible to take anyones word versus doing the work yourself to test it.
>
> If I were to check the maths of every person who puts forward
> maths here and at the Hof M...I would never have any time to
> discuss the Old Kingdom Egyptians

Fortunately for you, the AE had a simpler system of math and only requires visual understanding versus pages of mathematical calculations... :)
ofcourse they both have to be joined to prove the theorems.

this line of discussion appears unproductive and is caught in a cyclic spin.
please either review the data and offer what ever you feel ...
Or, simply go the other direction. I cannot waste anymore time here.

Thanks for "trying"....


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 497 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 444 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 486 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 374 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 443 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 417 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 382 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 361 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 498 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 334 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 339 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 401 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 367 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 362 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 348 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 352 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 444 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 344 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 355 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 394 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 346 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 326 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 322 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 352 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 337 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 386 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 418 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 385 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 336 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 387 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 407 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 332 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 374 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 387 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 439 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 377 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 414 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 356 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 274 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 334 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 553 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 349 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 321 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 429 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 377 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 357 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 323 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 305 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 341 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 403 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 325 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 450 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 344 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 300 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 312 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 326 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 461 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 382 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 352 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 323 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 317 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 330 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 394 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 341 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 404 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 341 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 320 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 392 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 340 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 383 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 455 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 327 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 346 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 374 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 288 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.