Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Warwick wrote:

> <<> 1. I cannot reply here without first referring you to the
> Hall
> > of Ma'at as a site where evidence comes first
>
> Not in my experience Mr Warwick. "evidence" has been presented
> @ Ma'at and in my opinion ignored or not properly addressed by
> those that convey a level of knowledge and understanding of the
> AE above and beyond anybody else that tries to present
> evidenced data that has the potential to alter orthodox beliefs
> if not disproven.>>
>
> That's too bad
>
> Strange then that the likes that of Robert Bauval have used the
> site to vet their ideas since it's inception
>
> There is allways the possibility that what you presented is not
> correct

There also exists the possibility that it is correct Warwick. given i stated they are "proven" theorems....and, I show you how they were derived from the GP structure then correlate to the AE Rhind.

> "> 2. the best site for debunking theory is not on the
> > internet..it is your public library.
>
>
> disagree. Books @ a library are only a snapshot of historical
> data and understandings at the time of their print."
>
> but the books in print ARE Dated...Where else do you suggest
> one gets a background in AE history??

I'm simply conveying that what one sets their foundation upon must be revisted and tested for any "new" information that might apply if utilizing old texts.

> and the Photos within are hard evidence/reference
>
> I'm sorry but I cannot take seriously any reserarcher who does
> not read


hugh? where did that comment come from? I provide data linked to the AE Rhind? And I apparently did this without reading? come on man.

>
> "I respect your input Warwick.... this data is made possbile
> with the help of the many great re-searchers right here @ GHMB.
> I had hoped to gain the orthodox's opinions through Ma'at...
> however, that has turned into another learning experience...
>
> I simply find it difficult to see orthodox's argument that no
> mathematical concepts would be embedded within their
> structures."
>
> try seeing what is actually there

I did...and show proof of it.

>
> the orthodox argument, if such can actually be said to exist,
> is that the encodation of mathematical concepts does not fit
> with our understanding of their beliefs.
>
> any theory that purports to Solve the Mystery of the Pyramids
> without cultural corroboration is not an Egyptological one
>
> But we are here to guide Titus in his seach for feedback
>
> I'd like to think that we can allow him to draw his own
> conclusions
>
> I cannot see how attempting to revive the Ortho Alterno
> Nonsense that he is asking that we got beyond is anything but
> disinformational and non constructive.
>
>
> Warwick
>


thanks for your brief time.... pretty much what i expected.
Time to go enjoy the day.... this is a waste of time.
cheers.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
debunking alternative theories 437 Titus Livius 02-Jul-09 19:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 329 cladking 02-Jul-09 19:55
Re: debunking alternative theories 271 drew 02-Jul-09 23:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 305 Scott Creighton 02-Jul-09 23:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 00:01
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 cladking 03-Jul-09 01:37
Re: debunking alternative theories 306 survivalcell 03-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 286 cladking 04-Jul-09 00:07
Re: debunking alternative theories 364 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 330 cladking 04-Jul-09 07:26
Re: debunking alternative theories 344 Susan Doris 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 07:31
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:10
Re: debunking alternative theories 341 cladking 03-Jul-09 22:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:27
Re: debunking alternative theories 328 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 385 carolb 06-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 303 papalou 06-Jul-09 23:29
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 carolb 07-Jul-09 16:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 294 NetWorkAngel 07-Jul-09 16:51
Re: debunking alternative theories 331 Bobajot 08-Jul-09 03:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 272 Andy McCallum 02-Jul-09 22:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 Archae Solenhofen 02-Jul-09 23:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 275 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 00:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 03:17
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:23
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:20
Scott 314 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:13
Re: debunking alternative theories 324 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 23:59
Re: debunking alternative theories 313 cladking 04-Jul-09 01:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Archae Solenhofen 04-Jul-09 18:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 cladking 04-Jul-09 18:54
Re: debunking alternative theories 293 papalou 05-Jul-09 22:47
The coiled serpent 290 Morph 06-Jul-09 13:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 07:03
Re: debunking alternative theories 304 cladking 06-Jul-09 21:46
Re: debunking alternative theories 353 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 317 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:16
Re: debunking alternative theories 354 Archae Solenhofen 03-Jul-09 18:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 307 Morph 02-Jul-09 23:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 308 drew 02-Jul-09 23:25
Re: debunking alternative theories 325 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:48
Re: debunking alternative theories 277 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:08
Re: debunking alternative theories 371 richarddullum 03-Jul-09 05:50
Re: debunking alternative theories 301 Titus Livius 03-Jul-09 17:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 342 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 315 Titus Livius 04-Jul-09 11:57
Re: debunking alternative theories 352 cladking 04-Jul-09 19:14
Re: debunking alternative theories 287 Titus Livius 05-Jul-09 10:22
Re: debunking alternative theories 319 cladking 05-Jul-09 20:18
Re: debunking alternative theories 346 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:36
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Susan Doris 03-Jul-09 07:43
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 Scott Creighton 03-Jul-09 10:58
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Essan 03-Jul-09 08:52
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Laird Scranton 03-Jul-09 15:05
Re: debunking alternative theories 321 Warwick 03-Jul-09 17:47
more scholarly feedback 243 Warwick 03-Jul-09 18:00
Re: more scholarly feedback 306 cladking 03-Jul-09 23:45
Re: debunking alternative theories 432 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 18:42
actually.. 320 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:08
Re: actually.. 285 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:17
Re: actually.. 309 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:39
Re: actually.. 338 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:43
Re: actually.. 326 Warwick 03-Jul-09 19:50
Re: actually.. 292 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 19:56
Re: actually.. 282 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:13
Re: actually.. 273 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:33
Posturing.. 306 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:46
Re: Posturing.. 315 Rob Miller 03-Jul-09 20:54
Re: Posturing.. 296 Warwick 03-Jul-09 21:01
Re:Opinion Alert! 326 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 06:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 315 Warwick 04-Jul-09 17:58
Re:Opinion Alert! 273 Sirfiroth 04-Jul-09 19:49
Re:Opinion Alert! 282 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 20:03
Re:Opinion Alert! 290 Warwick 05-Jul-09 18:45
Re:Opinion Alert! 340 Sirfiroth 05-Jul-09 20:21
Re:Opinion Alert! 353 Warwick 05-Jul-09 21:05
Re: Posturing.. 322 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 08:15
Re: Posturing.. 294 Warwick 04-Jul-09 18:10
Re: Posturing.. 288 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 18:33
Re: Posturing.. 296 Warwick 04-Jul-09 19:09
Re: Posturing.. 363 Rob Miller 04-Jul-09 19:27
Re: Posturing.. 312 cladking 04-Jul-09 20:01
Re: actually.. 374 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:15
Re: debunking alternative theories 314 drew 04-Jul-09 03:24
Titus 311 Warwick 03-Jul-09 20:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 291 Diomede 05-Jul-09 22:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 360 Susan Doris 06-Jul-09 06:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 309 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 14:56
Re: debunking alternative theories 322 Titus Livius 06-Jul-09 18:39
Re: debunking alternative theories 351 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 20:40
Re: debunking alternative theories 338 bookwise 06-Jul-09 15:24
Re: debunking alternative theories 296 Laird Scranton 06-Jul-09 15:47
Re: debunking alternative theories 280 Diomede 06-Jul-09 20:11
Re: debunking alternative theories 298 bookwise 06-Jul-09 20:49
Re: debunking alternative theories 318 Susan Doris 07-Jul-09 07:38
Re: debunking alternative theories 343 Titus Livius 08-Jul-09 18:34
Re: debunking alternative theories 263 Warwick 08-Jul-09 19:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.