Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
<<> 1. I cannot reply here without first referring you to the Hall
> of Ma'at as a site where evidence comes first
Not in my experience Mr Warwick. "evidence" has been presented @ Ma'at and in my opinion ignored or not properly addressed by those that convey a level of knowledge and understanding of the AE above and beyond anybody else that tries to present evidenced data that has the potential to alter orthodox beliefs if not disproven.>>
That's too bad
Strange then that the likes that of Robert Bauval have used the site to vet their ideas since it's inception
There is allways the possibility that what you presented is not correct
"> 2. the best site for debunking theory is not on the
> internet..it is your public library.
disagree. Books @ a library are only a snapshot of historical data and understandings at the time of their print."
but the books in print ARE Dated...Where else do you suggest one gets a background in AE history??
and the Photos within are hard evidence/reference
I'm sorry but I cannot take seriously any reserarcher who does not read
"I respect your input Warwick.... this data is made possbile with the help of the many great re-searchers right here @ GHMB. I had hoped to gain the orthodox's opinions through Ma'at... however, that has turned into another learning experience...
I simply find it difficult to see orthodox's argument that no mathematical concepts would be embedded within their structures."
try seeing what is actually there
the orthodox argument, if such can actually be said to exist, is that the encodation of mathematical concepts does not fit with our understanding of their beliefs.
any theory that purports to Solve the Mystery of the Pyramids without cultural corroboration is not an Egyptological one
But we are here to guide Titus in his seach for feedback
I'd like to think that we can allow him to draw his own conclusions
I cannot see how attempting to revive the Ortho Alterno Nonsense that he is asking that we got beyond is anything but disinformational and non constructive.
Warwick
> of Ma'at as a site where evidence comes first
Not in my experience Mr Warwick. "evidence" has been presented @ Ma'at and in my opinion ignored or not properly addressed by those that convey a level of knowledge and understanding of the AE above and beyond anybody else that tries to present evidenced data that has the potential to alter orthodox beliefs if not disproven.>>
That's too bad
Strange then that the likes that of Robert Bauval have used the site to vet their ideas since it's inception
There is allways the possibility that what you presented is not correct
"> 2. the best site for debunking theory is not on the
> internet..it is your public library.
disagree. Books @ a library are only a snapshot of historical data and understandings at the time of their print."
but the books in print ARE Dated...Where else do you suggest one gets a background in AE history??
and the Photos within are hard evidence/reference
I'm sorry but I cannot take seriously any reserarcher who does not read
"I respect your input Warwick.... this data is made possbile with the help of the many great re-searchers right here @ GHMB. I had hoped to gain the orthodox's opinions through Ma'at... however, that has turned into another learning experience...
I simply find it difficult to see orthodox's argument that no mathematical concepts would be embedded within their structures."
try seeing what is actually there
the orthodox argument, if such can actually be said to exist, is that the encodation of mathematical concepts does not fit with our understanding of their beliefs.
any theory that purports to Solve the Mystery of the Pyramids without cultural corroboration is not an Egyptological one
But we are here to guide Titus in his seach for feedback
I'd like to think that we can allow him to draw his own conclusions
I cannot see how attempting to revive the Ortho Alterno Nonsense that he is asking that we got beyond is anything but disinformational and non constructive.
Warwick
" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."
Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."
Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.