Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
SC: You give the impression that "Pseudo" should be equated with "unscientific". This is wrong. It is a question of how scientific evidence is to be interpreted. The errosion of the Sphinx and its enclosure is a good example of this. Some scientists argue in favour of one errosion mechanism whilst other scientists argue in favour of a different mechanism. Each mechanism offers a different date. How do you regard this as "pseudo"?
SC
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Quote
SD: ...to follow the pseudo path without keeping a stronger hold on the scientific one would be a mistake.
SC: You give the impression that "Pseudo" should be equated with "unscientific". This is wrong. It is a question of how scientific evidence is to be interpreted. The errosion of the Sphinx and its enclosure is a good example of this. Some scientists argue in favour of one errosion mechanism whilst other scientists argue in favour of a different mechanism. Each mechanism offers a different date. How do you regard this as "pseudo"?
SC
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.