>SC: And not without a good dose of your spin thrown in for good
>measure. You see only what you want to see and remain
>oblivious to the fact that your spin distorts the truth.
You should ask Mr. Hancock how the numerous >50 ton granite blocks got into the King's Chamber when the Old Kingdom Egyptians built it. For someone who suspects spin at every turn you seem quite oblivious to it when its staring you so obviously in the face..... and in so the actual validity of such as well. I will continue to point out that reality is not even remotely close to the overly gross exaggerated claims of hundreds of >200 ton blocks in Khafre's valley temple with the smallest of blocks greater than 50 tons every time someone brings up any suggestion that the Valley Temple is older than Old Kingdom/Early Dynastic base on these original claims that the ancient Egyptians could not move the blocks because they were too big. After all, it's one of the underlying tenets of such so intricately spread through alternative history literature and into what a now a convoluted mess irrespective of whether you are blind to the truth in that. If you wish to incorporate the only 4-5 >200 ton blocks, all found at ground level, either right next to the quarry or in it, some with lever slots, and none of which are anywhere near the Sphinx into a new house of cards I await your shuffle and deal. I won't bother to wish you better luck and a longer run in that one than the last crowd had....
Archae Solenhofen (email@example.com)