Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Good evening GHMB,

Not sure where Stephen is... so, I guess the game is on rain delay? :)

Anyway, I'll push on....

It’s been a while since I ventured into my own thread topic.
Consequently, given all the new data and info presented lately with little feedback ; I’ve decided to step out on a limb and challenge with this thread.

I am not much of a writer so please bare with me through this. And, I must warn you that you will be required to absorb some math to grasp what this topic suggests and will prove. Fortunately, everything presented is of an elementary nature meaning I dropped everything I knew and started fresh and worked the geometry then observed and tried to see what the geometry was saying without set understandings dictating how it should be viewed.
As an observer, I can say once you can grasp and understand the foundational system that binds the circle with the square , the math and number appears more complex then the simplicity conveyed through “seeing” the geometry itself… they say the same thing. Visually grasping versus having to intellectually grasp is like dial-up versus broad band.

I don’t want to get too deep or attempt to tie any meanings or prove any wild theory. that is for the far more qualified in that area then me. And, for the record, my purpose has not been to try to warp or twist and mold anything into any preconceived idea, notion and or theory. I currently have no theory other then I feel and believe the ancients possessed knowledge far above what we presently can grasp.

To achieve what currently observe today of their skills given their structures would logically suggests an understanding combined with a set of mathematical skills far greater then any orthodox presently allows. Ultimately tipping the hand of many to steer towards the wild theories.
we did not possess the proof for us to understand it… therefore, it could not be possible…

Hence, “No writings… no understandings” became the theme..

I have found the great work of many others who have been suggesting this 'hidden system' for lack of better phrase; and, for years have displayed and demonstrated a systematic flow within the units correlated to these structures; combining common culture metrology ratios and resulting in beyond coincidence solutions that appeared to flow and convey ‘something’. Unfortunately, mainstream has been able to counter with “coincidence” for every attempt given no real foundation to BASE from…sighting insignificance within the “unit” correlations.

If there was mathematical proof to bind the flow of these units into some foundational mathematical system; then there could be no more coincidences.

Again, I was not prepared to present most of this data yet. Given I feel it will set a new foundation to potentially join the two competing camps of known versus ‘unknown’ past. If we can prove the ancients understood complex math via simple geometry. I believe we could take away “wild” from CAMP2 and allow CAMP1 to see the built in metrology connections given the built in units convey foundational systems of math and geometry and….

Again, this does not define any purpose. It only defines a “hidden in plane geometric sight” meaning via the Architect and becomes sacred do to this dual meaning because it passes on knowledge through time.
When Morph provided the Art from the Ancient Aztec/Mayans conveying their view of the Universe.
And, I was able to extract some of the BASE geometric design. I quickly realized that what many of the great pioneers before me have been trying to piece together, Now might have gained intention combined with a much needed foundation:

I don’t have many cards left for this poker table… So, I will provide what I feel is going to be the BASE mathematical proof to link these theorems with the AE,GP,AZTEC etc… mainly for my brothers to set the foundation for what they have been working so hard at. I still hold the step by step extraction of that Aztec design that cannot be mistaken for anything other then the math that you will find on within the link. And, I seriously doubt that the Ancient Aztec and Mayan would supersede the Ancient AE given the very same formula is actually present within the older structure, the testament to knowledge itself; the GP.

In closing, the GP houses knowledge that the ancients understood.
Foremost; the GP’s architecture represents this new to us concept of SQRT2/1:1:1/SQRT2 combined with the new concept andtheorem of hyperbolic… joining dimensions. I believe the Ancients understood the ‘concepts’ of the irrational however, the Rhind proves to me they converged it via combining rational approximations. I am leaning heavy towards the Rhind and the GP structure as bound given the math that exists within the GP. Which in turn would equate to the AE as the builders in my re-search.
The questions remains ‘how’?
But, I hope this math will begin to set a new foundation for the two camps to begin to work productively together….

Squaring the Circle’s AREA & PERIMETER via SQRT2/1:1:1/SQRT2 model.
A knowledge hidden in plane geometric sight within the GP.
[www.2dcode-r-past.com]

Many thanks to all the GHMB collaboration and insights gained and shared.

Special Thanks to:
Stephen Dail
Derek Skhane
Paul Marty Smith
Geoff Simmons
Latona Pristone
Jacob Boaz
Bernard Pietsch for his methodology of the observer.
Of course the late Mr J. Michell a pioneer in the field. His work “Dimensions of Paradise” is a great example of the units we are putting a foundation beneath.
And, all the great and knowledgeable individuals that frequent GHMB.


I challenge mainstream orthodox to review the above linked material then offer feedback.

many thanks,
Rob Miller


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 883 Rob Miller 13-Jun-09 23:59
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 307 ariston 14-Jun-09 01:50
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 262 Rob Miller 14-Jun-09 03:07
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 347 ariston 14-Jun-09 04:33
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 291 Rob Miller 14-Jun-09 14:04
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 299 ariston 14-Jun-09 16:36
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 266 ariston 14-Jun-09 20:07
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 332 ariston 14-Jun-09 20:23
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 263 ariston 15-Jun-09 01:35
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 244 Rob Miller 15-Jun-09 20:21
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 305 ariston 15-Jun-09 20:29
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 259 ariston 16-Jun-09 02:22
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 344 Rob Miller 16-Jun-09 16:45
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 247 Morph 14-Jun-09 15:21
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 317 Morph 14-Jun-09 15:30
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 249 Rob Miller 14-Jun-09 15:59
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 248 Morph 14-Jun-09 16:18
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 277 Morph 14-Jun-09 16:33
Using your drawing... 300 Morph 14-Jun-09 17:04
Re: Using your drawing... 327 Rob Miller 14-Jun-09 17:25
Re: Using your drawing... 287 Morph 15-Jun-09 12:19
Re: Using your drawing... 195 Rob Miller 15-Jun-09 20:36
Re: Using your drawing... 264 Morph 17-Jun-09 15:10
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 277 magisterchessmutt 15-Jun-09 12:27
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 295 Rob Miller 15-Jun-09 20:52
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 262 magisterchessmutt 15-Jun-09 21:54
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 294 Rob Miller 16-Jun-09 17:06
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 302 Rob Miller 16-Jun-09 17:15
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 315 Rob Miller 17-Jun-09 03:57
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 266 Sirfiroth 17-Jun-09 14:39
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 294 Rob Miller 17-Jun-09 17:22
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 304 Rob Miller 17-Jun-09 19:08
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 258 Modeh 18-Jun-09 01:24
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 249 Rob Miller 18-Jun-09 21:53
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 259 Sirfiroth 18-Jun-09 04:55
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 232 Rob Miller 18-Jun-09 21:50
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 289 magisterchessmutt 19-Jun-09 02:52
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 253 ariston 19-Jun-09 04:56
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 200 Joyeuse 19-Jun-09 05:02
my post above timed 5:02 is the nr 52 of this thread 246 Joyeuse 19-Jun-09 05:08
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 263 Rob Miller 19-Jun-09 19:12
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 273 Sirfiroth 19-Jun-09 17:16
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 302 Rob Miller 20-Jun-09 02:26
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 276 Sirfiroth 20-Jun-09 18:54
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 243 Rob Miller 20-Jun-09 19:26
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 344 P Mac 21-Jun-09 01:18
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 293 magisterchessmutt 21-Jun-09 12:22
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 310 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 14:43
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 317 magisterchessmutt 21-Jun-09 15:55
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 307 P Mac 21-Jun-09 17:47
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 276 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 13:30
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 290 Glanymor1948 21-Jun-09 15:28
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 332 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 16:05
Re: Phyperbolic Hexa... 308 Glanymor1948 22-Jun-09 13:30
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 261 Rob Miller 20-Jun-09 23:51
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 277 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 00:12
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 299 ariston 17-Jun-09 03:44
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 289 ariston 17-Jun-09 04:15
Re: 14/11*1000=Gematria{rat} 295 ariston 17-Jun-09 05:02
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 316 magisterchessmutt 17-Jun-09 11:23
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 283 ariston 17-Jun-09 16:30
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 278 ariston 17-Jun-09 16:49
Re:Mods? 254 ariston 17-Jun-09 18:29
Re:Mods? 274 Rob Miller 17-Jun-09 18:58
Re:14/11 297 ariston 18-Jun-09 01:44
Re:14/11 315 Rob Miller 18-Jun-09 02:48
Re:14/11 300 ariston 18-Jun-09 03:09
Re:14/11 268 Joyeuse 18-Jun-09 06:03
Re:14/11 298 ariston 18-Jun-09 13:42
Re:14/11 249 Joyeuse 18-Jun-09 15:36
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 333 P Mac 19-Jun-09 11:59
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 307 ariston 19-Jun-09 12:54
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 272 P Mac 19-Jun-09 13:38
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 256 Rob Miller 19-Jun-09 14:24
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 238 P Mac 20-Jun-09 12:39
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 272 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 00:03
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 280 Rob Miller 21-Jun-09 17:16
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 230 Modeh 21-Jun-09 22:19
Re: GP is a 'testament' to knowledge itself. 298 ariston 21-Jun-09 22:51
addendum 304 Modeh 21-Jun-09 23:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.