R and M wrote:

> So Milo, first you say that I am channelling other people's
> information and then next you say......
> which begs the question whether you're in touch with ordinary
> people.
>
> You contradict yourself again and again in your posts!

How can I be contradicting myself if you give a "first" but don't follow it up with a "second" to make a comparison?

> Of course spirit does not speak like we do, who would want them
> to....we are too crass and are burdened with "negativity" in
> our environmental union.
>
> You seem to crackle with this negative stance from how you
> approach other people, as if they are your victims.

Crackle? Victims? It's not at all clear what you're on about.

> Whenever any information is channelled it comes out in
> technical and paranormal - vexing - mind boggling terms that
> causes us to question it, so that it can be pulled apart and
> brought down to a level of communication that we use in an
> every day sense.....hence the very reason why we do not
> understand spirit as a total sense of union. Spirit don't
> communicate and tell us what to do, that is our choice.
>
> Funny how some have said my posts are inspiring, seems they
> must be able to communicate on the same channel that I am
> on.....so I will keep on posting and then breaking down the
> information as it comes out through question and answer time.

Then it's up to you to explain what you've had communicated in a way that isn't technical and paranormal. It's no good just passing something on in its undeciphered state, otherwise it still remains unintelligible.

> As you, yourself have tried to distinguish through anagrams
> "is" there something more in words than simply expressing
> them.......spirit rectifies/clarifies that this is the case
> because every stroke, any thing that is created or expressed is
> a part of a minute organization of fractal energy........so
> words themselves are expressing a spirit value....a voice all
> of its own through its fractal design.....maybe that is what I
> hear.

What you posted in that anagram thread didn't even make any sense. That's why I didn't reply to it. It didn't follow the ABC of communication... The best communication should be as accurate, brief and clear as possible.

> You say Jesus said.........yet, how can this be
> truthful.....when the same statements have come out of the
> mouths of other identities before this era of Revelations were
> written. You can then apply that Jesus simply rehashed what
> someone else has said.....just as I explained before from
> previous historical accounts. Just as you rehash the words.

Because the knowledge we're talking about all comes from the same divine source. The problem is that some divine beings are fallen and in order to work out from which source it comes, you have to work out the bigger picture. Christ revealed that bigger picture and exposed the lies and hypocrisy of those beings that seek to deceive. None of the Pagan solar deities detailed the conspiracy that has now globally befallen humanity and therein is a clue which sources should be trusted.

> What makes someone "divine" is simply the reverence of other
> people.

I disagree. What makes someone divine is what they say and how effectively they said it. For example, if someone claims to be the Son of God, you have to examine what they said and they amount and depth of knowledge they share, and IMO, Christ's words ring true. Much truer that I find your words, but that's only my opinion.

> 31. Then Jesus said to those Jews who
> believed Him, "If you abide in My word,
> you are My disciples indeed. 32. And you
> shall know the truth, and the truth shall
> make you free." (John 8:31, 32, NKJV)......therefore everyone
> abides the "word" which just happens to be created at the
> beginning of time itself.
>
> Being a disciple is to therefore reference where the word was
> established....being a very distant place in time......a place
> that led to the era when Jesus was established to become a
> deity of spiritual inspiration....it does not clarify that
> Jesus "was" an actual citizen in life!

What do you mean by "an actual citizen of life? You started off making sense and then you add bathos by going off on a strange tangent, rendering the first part of what you said, nonsensical.

> A disciple simply follows what the Law of God states......to
> try and live in a communal environment, through which we live
> and learn because of the enironmental factors = the good and
> bad experiences that clarify how anyone us learnt to create
> Laws. Thus cause and effect was already instituted by God and
> the word in creation itself because it forced us to learn what
> is an incident of plus or an incidence of minus.
>
> Hence as Latona pointed out.....you don't just experience
> "love" through a positive....you learn, meaning that you earn
> your outcome because we can express life through our own will.

It's just not clear what point you're making. Of course one learns from environmental facts, and?

> No matter how you try to express "balance", we did not have
> balance in the beginning......it was created from chaos into
> balance because of fire/water.....both the expressions of God
> and once again you would not be in existence if this did not
> occur. Balance was not suddenly something "plonked" into
> existence it had to be created for it to exist.

Chaos to us is not chaos from God's perspective. I never said there was balance in the beginning from our perspective.

> Hence someone....somewhere had to fall from the super conscious
> state of the "angels" to enable creation to be enacted. You
> want to lay blame on a being in a higher field equation because
> you do not understand that someone had to "carry the sins of
> the world", therefore the Sins are carried by the positive
> vessel, created by the holy flame.

You're so confused, Wendy that it's even difficult to unravel and explain why you're confused. I am not laying blame on a being just because it came with the "sins of the world". What I'm drawing attention to is the USE of free will. Satan abused his will power in order to deceive through lies in order to keep people trapped in a false paradigm.

> In the combustion theory we have cold fusion and heated
> fusion.....therefore 2 deities express this in a spiritual
> context of the holy flame. This is how the "fall" in Heaven is
> expressed.....so it is the everyday guy who blames the
> "devil/satan" for the committing of human sin.......yet this is
> simply a spiritual being who is a part of the creative concept
> itself.

I do not direct blame as a mode of shirking responsibility, however, as you suggest. It's no good saying the devil made me do it because, at the end of the day, it's necessary to accept self responsibility. It's clear you don't even understand what my views are.

> You are given free will to express whatever value you want and
> these expressions are so vast that to try and begin to list
> them would take you forever.

Of course they would but I've never even tried to do that. The point is that if anyone pursues evil, they will eventually be undone by that evil. that's why it's important not to follow evil paths. It's not even necessary to follow an evil path because a being has sufficient free will how to choose to use God's power. Satan didn't have to fall. He only fell because he made a bad choice.

Rob