Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R and M wrote:

> So Milo, first you say that I am channelling other people's
> information and then next you say......
> which begs the question whether you're in touch with ordinary
> people.
>
> You contradict yourself again and again in your posts!

How can I be contradicting myself if you give a "first" but don't follow it up with a "second" to make a comparison?

> Of course spirit does not speak like we do, who would want them
> to....we are too crass and are burdened with "negativity" in
> our environmental union.
>
> You seem to crackle with this negative stance from how you
> approach other people, as if they are your victims.

Crackle? Victims? It's not at all clear what you're on about.

> Whenever any information is channelled it comes out in
> technical and paranormal - vexing - mind boggling terms that
> causes us to question it, so that it can be pulled apart and
> brought down to a level of communication that we use in an
> every day sense.....hence the very reason why we do not
> understand spirit as a total sense of union. Spirit don't
> communicate and tell us what to do, that is our choice.
>
> Funny how some have said my posts are inspiring, seems they
> must be able to communicate on the same channel that I am
> on.....so I will keep on posting and then breaking down the
> information as it comes out through question and answer time.

Then it's up to you to explain what you've had communicated in a way that isn't technical and paranormal. It's no good just passing something on in its undeciphered state, otherwise it still remains unintelligible.

> As you, yourself have tried to distinguish through anagrams
> "is" there something more in words than simply expressing
> them.......spirit rectifies/clarifies that this is the case
> because every stroke, any thing that is created or expressed is
> a part of a minute organization of fractal energy........so
> words themselves are expressing a spirit value....a voice all
> of its own through its fractal design.....maybe that is what I
> hear.

What you posted in that anagram thread didn't even make any sense. That's why I didn't reply to it. It didn't follow the ABC of communication... The best communication should be as accurate, brief and clear as possible.

> You say Jesus said.........yet, how can this be
> truthful.....when the same statements have come out of the
> mouths of other identities before this era of Revelations were
> written. You can then apply that Jesus simply rehashed what
> someone else has said.....just as I explained before from
> previous historical accounts. Just as you rehash the words.

Because the knowledge we're talking about all comes from the same divine source. The problem is that some divine beings are fallen and in order to work out from which source it comes, you have to work out the bigger picture. Christ revealed that bigger picture and exposed the lies and hypocrisy of those beings that seek to deceive. None of the Pagan solar deities detailed the conspiracy that has now globally befallen humanity and therein is a clue which sources should be trusted.

> What makes someone "divine" is simply the reverence of other
> people.

I disagree. What makes someone divine is what they say and how effectively they said it. For example, if someone claims to be the Son of God, you have to examine what they said and they amount and depth of knowledge they share, and IMO, Christ's words ring true. Much truer that I find your words, but that's only my opinion.

> 31. Then Jesus said to those Jews who
> believed Him, "If you abide in My word,
> you are My disciples indeed. 32. And you
> shall know the truth, and the truth shall
> make you free." (John 8:31, 32, NKJV)......therefore everyone
> abides the "word" which just happens to be created at the
> beginning of time itself.
>
> Being a disciple is to therefore reference where the word was
> established....being a very distant place in time......a place
> that led to the era when Jesus was established to become a
> deity of spiritual inspiration....it does not clarify that
> Jesus "was" an actual citizen in life!

What do you mean by "an actual citizen of life? You started off making sense and then you add bathos by going off on a strange tangent, rendering the first part of what you said, nonsensical.

> A disciple simply follows what the Law of God states......to
> try and live in a communal environment, through which we live
> and learn because of the enironmental factors = the good and
> bad experiences that clarify how anyone us learnt to create
> Laws. Thus cause and effect was already instituted by God and
> the word in creation itself because it forced us to learn what
> is an incident of plus or an incidence of minus.
>
> Hence as Latona pointed out.....you don't just experience
> "love" through a positive....you learn, meaning that you earn
> your outcome because we can express life through our own will.

It's just not clear what point you're making. Of course one learns from environmental facts, and?

> No matter how you try to express "balance", we did not have
> balance in the beginning......it was created from chaos into
> balance because of fire/water.....both the expressions of God
> and once again you would not be in existence if this did not
> occur. Balance was not suddenly something "plonked" into
> existence it had to be created for it to exist.

Chaos to us is not chaos from God's perspective. I never said there was balance in the beginning from our perspective.

> Hence someone....somewhere had to fall from the super conscious
> state of the "angels" to enable creation to be enacted. You
> want to lay blame on a being in a higher field equation because
> you do not understand that someone had to "carry the sins of
> the world", therefore the Sins are carried by the positive
> vessel, created by the holy flame.

You're so confused, Wendy that it's even difficult to unravel and explain why you're confused. I am not laying blame on a being just because it came with the "sins of the world". What I'm drawing attention to is the USE of free will. Satan abused his will power in order to deceive through lies in order to keep people trapped in a false paradigm.

> In the combustion theory we have cold fusion and heated
> fusion.....therefore 2 deities express this in a spiritual
> context of the holy flame. This is how the "fall" in Heaven is
> expressed.....so it is the everyday guy who blames the
> "devil/satan" for the committing of human sin.......yet this is
> simply a spiritual being who is a part of the creative concept
> itself.

I do not direct blame as a mode of shirking responsibility, however, as you suggest. It's no good saying the devil made me do it because, at the end of the day, it's necessary to accept self responsibility. It's clear you don't even understand what my views are.

> You are given free will to express whatever value you want and
> these expressions are so vast that to try and begin to list
> them would take you forever.

Of course they would but I've never even tried to do that. The point is that if anyone pursues evil, they will eventually be undone by that evil. that's why it's important not to follow evil paths. It's not even necessary to follow an evil path because a being has sufficient free will how to choose to use God's power. Satan didn't have to fall. He only fell because he made a bad choice.

Rob

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 410 shamanaut 30-May-09 16:38
The work of Acharya S has been debunked 267 Milo 30-May-09 17:13
Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 218 shamanaut 30-May-09 23:14
Obviously Achyara supporters are going to Gawf 246 Milo 31-May-09 00:16
I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 249 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:15
Re: I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 234 Milo 31-May-09 16:24
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 265 David L 02-Jun-09 04:31
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 256 Milo 02-Jun-09 09:41
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 212 David L 03-Jun-09 04:48
Everyone on this forum has different beliefs to the next poster anyway 230 Milo 03-Jun-09 09:50
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 234 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:02
Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 286 Milo 31-May-09 01:10
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 210 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:02
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 226 Milo 31-May-09 02:23
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 216 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:06
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 226 Milo 31-May-09 03:18
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 221 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:33
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 228 Milo 31-May-09 03:47
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 221 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:44
Plagiarism 242 Milo 31-May-09 11:12
Re: Plagiarism 225 David Campbell 31-May-09 17:14
Re: Plagiarism 263 Milo 31-May-09 17:31
Re: Plagiarism 272 Lee McGiffen 03-Jun-09 14:08
Re: Plagiarism 196 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:48
Re: Plagiarism 238 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:29
Re: Plagiarism 242 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:34
Demons 233 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:40
Re: Demons 196 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:50
Re: Demons 236 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:03
Re: Plagiarism 226 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:07
Re: Plagiarism 206 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 05:23
Re: Plagiarism 220 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:14
Re: Plagiarism 246 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 12:30
Re: Plagiarism 224 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:35
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 220 papalou 03-Jun-09 23:03
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 224 Milo 03-Jun-09 23:09
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 254 papalou 04-Jun-09 18:01
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 207 Milo 04-Jun-09 18:57
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 206 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 19:06
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 216 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:40
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 203 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:41
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 227 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 08:25
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 243 Milo 08-Jun-09 12:42
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 201 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 13:49
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 270 Milo 08-Jun-09 13:53
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 244 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 14:44
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 223 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:52
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 241 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 15:23
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 257 Milo 08-Jun-09 15:32
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 220 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:14
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 224 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:21
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 180 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:31
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 209 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:34
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 251 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:13
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 219 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 241 David Campbell 31-May-09 00:42
The Underlying Agenda 213 Milo 31-May-09 01:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 254 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:18
Re: The Underlying Agenda 226 Milo 31-May-09 01:27
O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 202 Milo 31-May-09 01:48
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 225 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:41
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 187 Milo 31-May-09 02:44
Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 231 Milo 31-May-09 02:52
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 194 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:58
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 248 Milo 31-May-09 04:11
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 252 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:22
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 235 Milo 31-May-09 04:31
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 276 Milo 31-May-09 04:34
Re: The Underlying Agenda 243 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:28
Re: The Underlying Agenda 230 Milo 31-May-09 02:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 217 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 258 Milo 31-May-09 03:20
Re: The Underlying Agenda 222 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:11
Re: The Underlying Agenda 258 Milo 31-May-09 04:29
Re: The Underlying Agenda 221 The Kwuda 01-Jun-09 17:43
Re: The Underlying Agenda 230 Milo 01-Jun-09 19:14
Re: The Underlying Agenda 215 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 10:55
Re: The Underlying Agenda 209 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:09
Re: The Underlying Agenda 210 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 260 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The Underlying Agenda 203 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:51
Re: The Underlying Agenda 253 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:42
Re: The Underlying Agenda 244 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:16
Re: The Underlying Agenda 219 Milo 02-Jun-09 22:04
Re: The Underlying Agenda 252 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:47
source of my quote 225 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:48
Re: source of my quote 241 Milo 31-May-09 17:27
Re: source of my quote 231 Milo 31-May-09 17:40
Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 228 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 332 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 247 R and M 02-Jun-09 09:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 232 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:04
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 249 R and M 03-Jun-09 04:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 The Kwuda 04-Jun-09 06:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 250 Milo 04-Jun-09 10:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 232 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:34
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 217 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 247 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 214 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:40
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 227 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:46
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 256 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 229 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 206 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 229 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 227 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:41
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 221 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 213 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:48
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 224 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 219 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 228 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 222 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 199 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:55
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 237 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:56
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 229 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:58
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 224 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 224 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:01
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 268 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:03
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:06
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 215 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:09
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:13
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 232 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 251 R and M 04-Jun-09 10:49
The two seeds of Genesis 3 202 Milo 04-Jun-09 11:39
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 210 R and M 05-Jun-09 05:47
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 219 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:21
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 250 R and M 05-Jun-09 13:29
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 222 ariston 05-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 198 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:14
correction... 200 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:16
Re: correction... 192 ariston 05-Jun-09 14:39
Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 249 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:01
correction... 219 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:45
Re: correction... 205 ariston 05-Jun-09 18:16
Re: correction... 240 Milo 05-Jun-09 22:30
Re: correction... 248 ariston 06-Jun-09 02:19
Re: correction... 222 Milo 06-Jun-09 03:00
Re: correction... 189 ariston 06-Jun-09 04:12
Re: correction... 215 Milo 06-Jun-09 04:23
Re: correction... 222 Eddie Larry 07-Jun-09 15:23
Re: correction... 225 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:42
Re: correction... 259 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 02:50
Re: correction... 238 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:19
Re: correction... 187 Eddie Larry 10-Jun-09 00:50
Re: correction... 233 Milo 10-Jun-09 05:02
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 238 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:53
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 217 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:15
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 239 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:45
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 282 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:24
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 213 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:48
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 233 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:18
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 246 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:20
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 194 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:44
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 239 R and M 06-Jun-09 07:54
ABC 272 Milo 06-Jun-09 12:36
Re: the end 252 R and M 07-Jun-09 10:12
Re: the end 216 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:20
Re: the end 205 R and M 08-Jun-09 07:15
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:00
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 243 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 226 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 196 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 232 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 shamanaut 03-Jun-09 17:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 219 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 215 Raja 04-Jun-09 07:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 282 Aine 04-Jun-09 15:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 227 Milo 04-Jun-09 19:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 304 Aine 04-Jun-09 19:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 246 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 190 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 21:20
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:26
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 239 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 06:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 260 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:22
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 242 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 20:16
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 Raja 05-Jun-09 21:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 235 carolb 04-Jun-09 20:19
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 237 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 250 carolb 04-Jun-09 21:23
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 185 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 252 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 220 Milo 04-Jun-09 22:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 223 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 199 carolb 04-Jun-09 23:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 228 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:33
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 221 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:35
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 234 Tom Hebert 02-Jun-09 18:11
jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 223 Eddie Larry 03-Jun-09 04:44
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 292 Susan Doris 03-Jun-09 08:40
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 225 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 01:13
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 171 Tom Hebert 03-Jun-09 10:31
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 214 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:15
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 247 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:16
Jesus was not a myth 227 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:18
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 255 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 191 Diomede 04-Jun-09 00:11
For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 211 David L 04-Jun-09 02:34
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 210 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:38
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 229 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:10
Jesus 281 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:14
Diabolical Mimicry 237 Deep1 04-Jun-09 21:11
Re: Diabolical Mimicry 229 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:15
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 205 Enigcom 05-Jun-09 17:43
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 184 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 232 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 193 deeside 06-Jun-09 19:42
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 245 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:07
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 238 deeside 06-Jun-09 20:47
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 254 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:51
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 253 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:08
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 210 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 238 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 212 deeside 07-Jun-09 09:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 240 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 232 childinthesun 07-Jun-09 17:02
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 217 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 230 ariston 07-Jun-09 17:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 242 Milo 07-Jun-09 18:05
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 208 deeside 08-Jun-09 14:46
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 210 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:57
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 256 deeside 08-Jun-09 21:32
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 239 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:21
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 237 ariston 06-Jun-09 20:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 183 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 253 deeside 07-Jun-09 21:24
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 219 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 208 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 00:23
jesus was there... 225 shazaman 09-Jun-09 09:54
Re: jesus was there... 232 papalou 11-Jun-09 02:08
Re: jesus was there... 207 Milo 11-Jun-09 08:46
Re: jesus was there... 200 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 09:38
Re: jesus was there... 222 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:14
Re: jesus was there... 202 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:37
Re: jesus was there... 238 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 11:32
Re: jesus was there... 267 Milo 11-Jun-09 13:17
Re: jesus was there... 222 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 19:56
Re: jesus was there... 222 Milo 11-Jun-09 21:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 225 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 15:36


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.