Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R and M wrote:

> So Milo, first you say that I am channelling other people's
> information and then next you say......
> which begs the question whether you're in touch with ordinary
> people.
>
> You contradict yourself again and again in your posts!

How can I be contradicting myself if you give a "first" but don't follow it up with a "second" to make a comparison?

> Of course spirit does not speak like we do, who would want them
> to....we are too crass and are burdened with "negativity" in
> our environmental union.
>
> You seem to crackle with this negative stance from how you
> approach other people, as if they are your victims.

Crackle? Victims? It's not at all clear what you're on about.

> Whenever any information is channelled it comes out in
> technical and paranormal - vexing - mind boggling terms that
> causes us to question it, so that it can be pulled apart and
> brought down to a level of communication that we use in an
> every day sense.....hence the very reason why we do not
> understand spirit as a total sense of union. Spirit don't
> communicate and tell us what to do, that is our choice.
>
> Funny how some have said my posts are inspiring, seems they
> must be able to communicate on the same channel that I am
> on.....so I will keep on posting and then breaking down the
> information as it comes out through question and answer time.

Then it's up to you to explain what you've had communicated in a way that isn't technical and paranormal. It's no good just passing something on in its undeciphered state, otherwise it still remains unintelligible.

> As you, yourself have tried to distinguish through anagrams
> "is" there something more in words than simply expressing
> them.......spirit rectifies/clarifies that this is the case
> because every stroke, any thing that is created or expressed is
> a part of a minute organization of fractal energy........so
> words themselves are expressing a spirit value....a voice all
> of its own through its fractal design.....maybe that is what I
> hear.

What you posted in that anagram thread didn't even make any sense. That's why I didn't reply to it. It didn't follow the ABC of communication... The best communication should be as accurate, brief and clear as possible.

> You say Jesus said.........yet, how can this be
> truthful.....when the same statements have come out of the
> mouths of other identities before this era of Revelations were
> written. You can then apply that Jesus simply rehashed what
> someone else has said.....just as I explained before from
> previous historical accounts. Just as you rehash the words.

Because the knowledge we're talking about all comes from the same divine source. The problem is that some divine beings are fallen and in order to work out from which source it comes, you have to work out the bigger picture. Christ revealed that bigger picture and exposed the lies and hypocrisy of those beings that seek to deceive. None of the Pagan solar deities detailed the conspiracy that has now globally befallen humanity and therein is a clue which sources should be trusted.

> What makes someone "divine" is simply the reverence of other
> people.

I disagree. What makes someone divine is what they say and how effectively they said it. For example, if someone claims to be the Son of God, you have to examine what they said and they amount and depth of knowledge they share, and IMO, Christ's words ring true. Much truer that I find your words, but that's only my opinion.

> 31. Then Jesus said to those Jews who
> believed Him, "If you abide in My word,
> you are My disciples indeed. 32. And you
> shall know the truth, and the truth shall
> make you free." (John 8:31, 32, NKJV)......therefore everyone
> abides the "word" which just happens to be created at the
> beginning of time itself.
>
> Being a disciple is to therefore reference where the word was
> established....being a very distant place in time......a place
> that led to the era when Jesus was established to become a
> deity of spiritual inspiration....it does not clarify that
> Jesus "was" an actual citizen in life!

What do you mean by "an actual citizen of life? You started off making sense and then you add bathos by going off on a strange tangent, rendering the first part of what you said, nonsensical.

> A disciple simply follows what the Law of God states......to
> try and live in a communal environment, through which we live
> and learn because of the enironmental factors = the good and
> bad experiences that clarify how anyone us learnt to create
> Laws. Thus cause and effect was already instituted by God and
> the word in creation itself because it forced us to learn what
> is an incident of plus or an incidence of minus.
>
> Hence as Latona pointed out.....you don't just experience
> "love" through a positive....you learn, meaning that you earn
> your outcome because we can express life through our own will.

It's just not clear what point you're making. Of course one learns from environmental facts, and?

> No matter how you try to express "balance", we did not have
> balance in the beginning......it was created from chaos into
> balance because of fire/water.....both the expressions of God
> and once again you would not be in existence if this did not
> occur. Balance was not suddenly something "plonked" into
> existence it had to be created for it to exist.

Chaos to us is not chaos from God's perspective. I never said there was balance in the beginning from our perspective.

> Hence someone....somewhere had to fall from the super conscious
> state of the "angels" to enable creation to be enacted. You
> want to lay blame on a being in a higher field equation because
> you do not understand that someone had to "carry the sins of
> the world", therefore the Sins are carried by the positive
> vessel, created by the holy flame.

You're so confused, Wendy that it's even difficult to unravel and explain why you're confused. I am not laying blame on a being just because it came with the "sins of the world". What I'm drawing attention to is the USE of free will. Satan abused his will power in order to deceive through lies in order to keep people trapped in a false paradigm.

> In the combustion theory we have cold fusion and heated
> fusion.....therefore 2 deities express this in a spiritual
> context of the holy flame. This is how the "fall" in Heaven is
> expressed.....so it is the everyday guy who blames the
> "devil/satan" for the committing of human sin.......yet this is
> simply a spiritual being who is a part of the creative concept
> itself.

I do not direct blame as a mode of shirking responsibility, however, as you suggest. It's no good saying the devil made me do it because, at the end of the day, it's necessary to accept self responsibility. It's clear you don't even understand what my views are.

> You are given free will to express whatever value you want and
> these expressions are so vast that to try and begin to list
> them would take you forever.

Of course they would but I've never even tried to do that. The point is that if anyone pursues evil, they will eventually be undone by that evil. that's why it's important not to follow evil paths. It's not even necessary to follow an evil path because a being has sufficient free will how to choose to use God's power. Satan didn't have to fall. He only fell because he made a bad choice.

Rob

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 363 shamanaut 30-May-09 16:38
The work of Acharya S has been debunked 232 Milo 30-May-09 17:13
Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 180 shamanaut 30-May-09 23:14
Obviously Achyara supporters are going to Gawf 205 Milo 31-May-09 00:16
I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 213 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:15
Re: I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 193 Milo 31-May-09 16:24
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 225 David L 02-Jun-09 04:31
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 217 Milo 02-Jun-09 09:41
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 179 David L 03-Jun-09 04:48
Everyone on this forum has different beliefs to the next poster anyway 200 Milo 03-Jun-09 09:50
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 203 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:02
Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 248 Milo 31-May-09 01:10
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 177 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:02
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 192 Milo 31-May-09 02:23
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 180 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:06
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 193 Milo 31-May-09 03:18
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 185 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:33
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 185 Milo 31-May-09 03:47
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 189 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:44
Plagiarism 207 Milo 31-May-09 11:12
Re: Plagiarism 189 David Campbell 31-May-09 17:14
Re: Plagiarism 208 Milo 31-May-09 17:31
Re: Plagiarism 231 Lee McGiffen 03-Jun-09 14:08
Re: Plagiarism 161 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:48
Re: Plagiarism 205 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:29
Re: Plagiarism 211 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:34
Demons 193 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:40
Re: Demons 161 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:50
Re: Demons 193 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:03
Re: Plagiarism 191 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:07
Re: Plagiarism 170 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 05:23
Re: Plagiarism 190 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:14
Re: Plagiarism 210 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 12:30
Re: Plagiarism 187 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:35
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 187 papalou 03-Jun-09 23:03
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 193 Milo 03-Jun-09 23:09
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 220 papalou 04-Jun-09 18:01
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 172 Milo 04-Jun-09 18:57
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 171 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 19:06
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 178 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:40
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 172 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:41
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 192 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 08:25
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 212 Milo 08-Jun-09 12:42
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 165 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 13:49
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 233 Milo 08-Jun-09 13:53
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 211 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 14:44
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 191 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:52
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 207 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 15:23
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 224 Milo 08-Jun-09 15:32
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 182 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:14
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 187 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:21
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 148 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:31
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 172 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:34
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 187 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:13
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 177 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 206 David Campbell 31-May-09 00:42
The Underlying Agenda 178 Milo 31-May-09 01:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 217 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:18
Re: The Underlying Agenda 195 Milo 31-May-09 01:27
O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 165 Milo 31-May-09 01:48
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 192 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:41
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 155 Milo 31-May-09 02:44
Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 192 Milo 31-May-09 02:52
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 160 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:58
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 216 Milo 31-May-09 04:11
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 213 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:22
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 194 Milo 31-May-09 04:31
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 220 Milo 31-May-09 04:34
Re: The Underlying Agenda 208 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:28
Re: The Underlying Agenda 200 Milo 31-May-09 02:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 187 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 209 Milo 31-May-09 03:20
Re: The Underlying Agenda 188 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:11
Re: The Underlying Agenda 227 Milo 31-May-09 04:29
Re: The Underlying Agenda 184 The Kwuda 01-Jun-09 17:43
Re: The Underlying Agenda 191 Milo 01-Jun-09 19:14
Re: The Underlying Agenda 184 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 10:55
Re: The Underlying Agenda 175 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:09
Re: The Underlying Agenda 174 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 223 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The Underlying Agenda 160 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:51
Re: The Underlying Agenda 217 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:42
Re: The Underlying Agenda 202 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:16
Re: The Underlying Agenda 184 Milo 02-Jun-09 22:04
Re: The Underlying Agenda 220 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:47
source of my quote 191 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:48
Re: source of my quote 206 Milo 31-May-09 17:27
Re: source of my quote 192 Milo 31-May-09 17:40
Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 196 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 205 R and M 02-Jun-09 09:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 199 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:04
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 176 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 215 R and M 03-Jun-09 04:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 175 The Kwuda 04-Jun-09 06:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 217 Milo 04-Jun-09 10:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 168 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:34
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 181 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 210 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 181 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:40
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 185 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 164 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:46
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 219 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 194 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 170 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 195 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 194 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:41
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 172 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 182 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 171 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:48
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 194 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 188 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 181 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 184 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 160 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 168 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:55
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 202 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:56
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:58
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 189 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 187 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:01
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:03
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 163 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:06
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:09
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 154 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:13
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 198 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 213 R and M 04-Jun-09 10:49
The two seeds of Genesis 3 170 Milo 04-Jun-09 11:39
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 179 R and M 05-Jun-09 05:47
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 191 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:21
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 212 R and M 05-Jun-09 13:29
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 188 ariston 05-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 167 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:14
correction... 166 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:16
Re: correction... 163 ariston 05-Jun-09 14:39
Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 216 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:01
correction... 180 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:45
Re: correction... 169 ariston 05-Jun-09 18:16
Re: correction... 206 Milo 05-Jun-09 22:30
Re: correction... 213 ariston 06-Jun-09 02:19
Re: correction... 190 Milo 06-Jun-09 03:00
Re: correction... 159 ariston 06-Jun-09 04:12
Re: correction... 183 Milo 06-Jun-09 04:23
Re: correction... 190 Eddie Larry 07-Jun-09 15:23
Re: correction... 188 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:42
Re: correction... 220 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 02:50
Re: correction... 204 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:19
Re: correction... 153 Eddie Larry 10-Jun-09 00:50
Re: correction... 199 Milo 10-Jun-09 05:02
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 196 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:53
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 185 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:15
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 202 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:45
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 232 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:24
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 182 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:48
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 184 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:18
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 214 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:20
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 158 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:44
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 205 R and M 06-Jun-09 07:54
ABC 217 Milo 06-Jun-09 12:36
Re: the end 219 R and M 07-Jun-09 10:12
Re: the end 188 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:20
Re: the end 172 R and M 08-Jun-09 07:15
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:00
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 208 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 161 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 195 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 159 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 shamanaut 03-Jun-09 17:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 183 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 Raja 04-Jun-09 07:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 244 Aine 04-Jun-09 15:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 Milo 04-Jun-09 19:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 265 Aine 04-Jun-09 19:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 208 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 160 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 21:20
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 154 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:26
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 06:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 220 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:22
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 207 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 20:16
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 165 Raja 05-Jun-09 21:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 carolb 04-Jun-09 20:19
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 204 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 211 carolb 04-Jun-09 21:23
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 149 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 188 Milo 04-Jun-09 22:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 190 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 150 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 160 carolb 04-Jun-09 23:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 194 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:33
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 189 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:35
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 200 Tom Hebert 02-Jun-09 18:11
jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 190 Eddie Larry 03-Jun-09 04:44
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 215 Susan Doris 03-Jun-09 08:40
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 191 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 01:13
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 141 Tom Hebert 03-Jun-09 10:31
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 181 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:15
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 209 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:16
Jesus was not a myth 192 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:18
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 214 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 153 Diomede 04-Jun-09 00:11
For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 177 David L 04-Jun-09 02:34
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 174 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:38
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 195 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:10
Jesus 200 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:14
Diabolical Mimicry 204 Deep1 04-Jun-09 21:11
Re: Diabolical Mimicry 195 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:15
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 164 Enigcom 05-Jun-09 17:43
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 153 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 198 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 160 deeside 06-Jun-09 19:42
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 211 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:07
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 206 deeside 06-Jun-09 20:47
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 226 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:51
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 216 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:08
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 175 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 204 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 179 deeside 07-Jun-09 09:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 199 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 200 childinthesun 07-Jun-09 17:02
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 185 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 199 ariston 07-Jun-09 17:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 206 Milo 07-Jun-09 18:05
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 174 deeside 08-Jun-09 14:46
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 182 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:57
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 223 deeside 08-Jun-09 21:32
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 200 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:21
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 202 ariston 06-Jun-09 20:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 152 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 214 deeside 07-Jun-09 21:24
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 181 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 174 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 00:23
jesus was there... 192 shazaman 09-Jun-09 09:54
Re: jesus was there... 197 papalou 11-Jun-09 02:08
Re: jesus was there... 175 Milo 11-Jun-09 08:46
Re: jesus was there... 171 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 09:38
Re: jesus was there... 183 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:14
Re: jesus was there... 172 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:37
Re: jesus was there... 203 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 11:32
Re: jesus was there... 229 Milo 11-Jun-09 13:17
Re: jesus was there... 185 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 19:56
Re: jesus was there... 185 Milo 11-Jun-09 21:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 194 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 15:36


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.