Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R and M wrote:

> So Milo, first you say that I am channelling other people's
> information and then next you say......
> which begs the question whether you're in touch with ordinary
> people.
>
> You contradict yourself again and again in your posts!

How can I be contradicting myself if you give a "first" but don't follow it up with a "second" to make a comparison?

> Of course spirit does not speak like we do, who would want them
> to....we are too crass and are burdened with "negativity" in
> our environmental union.
>
> You seem to crackle with this negative stance from how you
> approach other people, as if they are your victims.

Crackle? Victims? It's not at all clear what you're on about.

> Whenever any information is channelled it comes out in
> technical and paranormal - vexing - mind boggling terms that
> causes us to question it, so that it can be pulled apart and
> brought down to a level of communication that we use in an
> every day sense.....hence the very reason why we do not
> understand spirit as a total sense of union. Spirit don't
> communicate and tell us what to do, that is our choice.
>
> Funny how some have said my posts are inspiring, seems they
> must be able to communicate on the same channel that I am
> on.....so I will keep on posting and then breaking down the
> information as it comes out through question and answer time.

Then it's up to you to explain what you've had communicated in a way that isn't technical and paranormal. It's no good just passing something on in its undeciphered state, otherwise it still remains unintelligible.

> As you, yourself have tried to distinguish through anagrams
> "is" there something more in words than simply expressing
> them.......spirit rectifies/clarifies that this is the case
> because every stroke, any thing that is created or expressed is
> a part of a minute organization of fractal energy........so
> words themselves are expressing a spirit value....a voice all
> of its own through its fractal design.....maybe that is what I
> hear.

What you posted in that anagram thread didn't even make any sense. That's why I didn't reply to it. It didn't follow the ABC of communication... The best communication should be as accurate, brief and clear as possible.

> You say Jesus said.........yet, how can this be
> truthful.....when the same statements have come out of the
> mouths of other identities before this era of Revelations were
> written. You can then apply that Jesus simply rehashed what
> someone else has said.....just as I explained before from
> previous historical accounts. Just as you rehash the words.

Because the knowledge we're talking about all comes from the same divine source. The problem is that some divine beings are fallen and in order to work out from which source it comes, you have to work out the bigger picture. Christ revealed that bigger picture and exposed the lies and hypocrisy of those beings that seek to deceive. None of the Pagan solar deities detailed the conspiracy that has now globally befallen humanity and therein is a clue which sources should be trusted.

> What makes someone "divine" is simply the reverence of other
> people.

I disagree. What makes someone divine is what they say and how effectively they said it. For example, if someone claims to be the Son of God, you have to examine what they said and they amount and depth of knowledge they share, and IMO, Christ's words ring true. Much truer that I find your words, but that's only my opinion.

> 31. Then Jesus said to those Jews who
> believed Him, "If you abide in My word,
> you are My disciples indeed. 32. And you
> shall know the truth, and the truth shall
> make you free." (John 8:31, 32, NKJV)......therefore everyone
> abides the "word" which just happens to be created at the
> beginning of time itself.
>
> Being a disciple is to therefore reference where the word was
> established....being a very distant place in time......a place
> that led to the era when Jesus was established to become a
> deity of spiritual inspiration....it does not clarify that
> Jesus "was" an actual citizen in life!

What do you mean by "an actual citizen of life? You started off making sense and then you add bathos by going off on a strange tangent, rendering the first part of what you said, nonsensical.

> A disciple simply follows what the Law of God states......to
> try and live in a communal environment, through which we live
> and learn because of the enironmental factors = the good and
> bad experiences that clarify how anyone us learnt to create
> Laws. Thus cause and effect was already instituted by God and
> the word in creation itself because it forced us to learn what
> is an incident of plus or an incidence of minus.
>
> Hence as Latona pointed out.....you don't just experience
> "love" through a positive....you learn, meaning that you earn
> your outcome because we can express life through our own will.

It's just not clear what point you're making. Of course one learns from environmental facts, and?

> No matter how you try to express "balance", we did not have
> balance in the beginning......it was created from chaos into
> balance because of fire/water.....both the expressions of God
> and once again you would not be in existence if this did not
> occur. Balance was not suddenly something "plonked" into
> existence it had to be created for it to exist.

Chaos to us is not chaos from God's perspective. I never said there was balance in the beginning from our perspective.

> Hence someone....somewhere had to fall from the super conscious
> state of the "angels" to enable creation to be enacted. You
> want to lay blame on a being in a higher field equation because
> you do not understand that someone had to "carry the sins of
> the world", therefore the Sins are carried by the positive
> vessel, created by the holy flame.

You're so confused, Wendy that it's even difficult to unravel and explain why you're confused. I am not laying blame on a being just because it came with the "sins of the world". What I'm drawing attention to is the USE of free will. Satan abused his will power in order to deceive through lies in order to keep people trapped in a false paradigm.

> In the combustion theory we have cold fusion and heated
> fusion.....therefore 2 deities express this in a spiritual
> context of the holy flame. This is how the "fall" in Heaven is
> expressed.....so it is the everyday guy who blames the
> "devil/satan" for the committing of human sin.......yet this is
> simply a spiritual being who is a part of the creative concept
> itself.

I do not direct blame as a mode of shirking responsibility, however, as you suggest. It's no good saying the devil made me do it because, at the end of the day, it's necessary to accept self responsibility. It's clear you don't even understand what my views are.

> You are given free will to express whatever value you want and
> these expressions are so vast that to try and begin to list
> them would take you forever.

Of course they would but I've never even tried to do that. The point is that if anyone pursues evil, they will eventually be undone by that evil. that's why it's important not to follow evil paths. It's not even necessary to follow an evil path because a being has sufficient free will how to choose to use God's power. Satan didn't have to fall. He only fell because he made a bad choice.

Rob

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 388 shamanaut 30-May-09 16:38
The work of Acharya S has been debunked 255 Milo 30-May-09 17:13
Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 204 shamanaut 30-May-09 23:14
Obviously Achyara supporters are going to Gawf 230 Milo 31-May-09 00:16
I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 235 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:15
Re: I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 215 Milo 31-May-09 16:24
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 246 David L 02-Jun-09 04:31
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 240 Milo 02-Jun-09 09:41
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 200 David L 03-Jun-09 04:48
Everyone on this forum has different beliefs to the next poster anyway 218 Milo 03-Jun-09 09:50
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 222 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:02
Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 272 Milo 31-May-09 01:10
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 197 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:02
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 213 Milo 31-May-09 02:23
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 201 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:06
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 214 Milo 31-May-09 03:18
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 207 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:33
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 206 Milo 31-May-09 03:47
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 209 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:44
Plagiarism 229 Milo 31-May-09 11:12
Re: Plagiarism 209 David Campbell 31-May-09 17:14
Re: Plagiarism 233 Milo 31-May-09 17:31
Re: Plagiarism 255 Lee McGiffen 03-Jun-09 14:08
Re: Plagiarism 184 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:48
Re: Plagiarism 224 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:29
Re: Plagiarism 230 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:34
Demons 213 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:40
Re: Demons 183 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:50
Re: Demons 217 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:03
Re: Plagiarism 212 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:07
Re: Plagiarism 191 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 05:23
Re: Plagiarism 211 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:14
Re: Plagiarism 233 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 12:30
Re: Plagiarism 208 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:35
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 208 papalou 03-Jun-09 23:03
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 213 Milo 03-Jun-09 23:09
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 239 papalou 04-Jun-09 18:01
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 194 Milo 04-Jun-09 18:57
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 196 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 19:06
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 202 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:40
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 189 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:41
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 210 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 08:25
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 232 Milo 08-Jun-09 12:42
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 188 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 13:49
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 255 Milo 08-Jun-09 13:53
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 230 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 14:44
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 211 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:52
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 225 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 15:23
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 242 Milo 08-Jun-09 15:32
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 204 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:14
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 208 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:21
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 168 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:31
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 196 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:34
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 212 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:13
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 203 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 227 David Campbell 31-May-09 00:42
The Underlying Agenda 200 Milo 31-May-09 01:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 239 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:18
Re: The Underlying Agenda 216 Milo 31-May-09 01:27
O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 187 Milo 31-May-09 01:48
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 213 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:41
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 176 Milo 31-May-09 02:44
Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 220 Milo 31-May-09 02:52
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 179 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:58
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 235 Milo 31-May-09 04:11
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 234 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:22
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 220 Milo 31-May-09 04:31
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 242 Milo 31-May-09 04:34
Re: The Underlying Agenda 230 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:28
Re: The Underlying Agenda 218 Milo 31-May-09 02:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 204 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 232 Milo 31-May-09 03:20
Re: The Underlying Agenda 209 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:11
Re: The Underlying Agenda 246 Milo 31-May-09 04:29
Re: The Underlying Agenda 206 The Kwuda 01-Jun-09 17:43
Re: The Underlying Agenda 214 Milo 01-Jun-09 19:14
Re: The Underlying Agenda 205 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 10:55
Re: The Underlying Agenda 194 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:09
Re: The Underlying Agenda 196 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 247 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The Underlying Agenda 184 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:51
Re: The Underlying Agenda 239 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:42
Re: The Underlying Agenda 233 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:16
Re: The Underlying Agenda 207 Milo 02-Jun-09 22:04
Re: The Underlying Agenda 240 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:47
source of my quote 212 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:48
Re: source of my quote 226 Milo 31-May-09 17:27
Re: source of my quote 212 Milo 31-May-09 17:40
Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 216 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 275 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 229 R and M 02-Jun-09 09:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 221 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:04
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 196 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 235 R and M 03-Jun-09 04:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 196 The Kwuda 04-Jun-09 06:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 236 Milo 04-Jun-09 10:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 187 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 220 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:34
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 202 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 201 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:40
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 212 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:46
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 244 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 217 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 190 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 217 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 216 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:41
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 205 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 195 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 204 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 188 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:48
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 215 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 207 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 199 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 208 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 208 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:55
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 221 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:56
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 213 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:58
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 207 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 204 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:01
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 253 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:03
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 183 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:06
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:09
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 172 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:13
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 217 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 237 R and M 04-Jun-09 10:49
The two seeds of Genesis 3 187 Milo 04-Jun-09 11:39
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 198 R and M 05-Jun-09 05:47
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 209 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:21
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 235 R and M 05-Jun-09 13:29
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 206 ariston 05-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 185 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:14
correction... 189 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:16
Re: correction... 182 ariston 05-Jun-09 14:39
Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 234 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:01
correction... 201 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:45
Re: correction... 193 ariston 05-Jun-09 18:16
Re: correction... 225 Milo 05-Jun-09 22:30
Re: correction... 235 ariston 06-Jun-09 02:19
Re: correction... 208 Milo 06-Jun-09 03:00
Re: correction... 174 ariston 06-Jun-09 04:12
Re: correction... 199 Milo 06-Jun-09 04:23
Re: correction... 206 Eddie Larry 07-Jun-09 15:23
Re: correction... 208 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:42
Re: correction... 245 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 02:50
Re: correction... 225 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:19
Re: correction... 176 Eddie Larry 10-Jun-09 00:50
Re: correction... 220 Milo 10-Jun-09 05:02
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 218 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:53
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 204 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:15
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 220 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:45
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 251 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:24
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 200 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:48
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 210 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:18
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 234 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:20
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 180 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:44
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 221 R and M 06-Jun-09 07:54
ABC 235 Milo 06-Jun-09 12:36
Re: the end 239 R and M 07-Jun-09 10:12
Re: the end 203 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:20
Re: the end 189 R and M 08-Jun-09 07:15
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 219 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:00
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 203 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 215 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 183 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 178 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 216 shamanaut 03-Jun-09 17:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 204 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 203 Raja 04-Jun-09 07:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 265 Aine 04-Jun-09 15:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 216 Milo 04-Jun-09 19:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 286 Aine 04-Jun-09 19:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 231 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 177 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 21:20
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 179 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:26
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 223 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 06:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 243 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:22
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 228 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 20:16
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 Raja 05-Jun-09 21:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 220 carolb 04-Jun-09 20:19
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 224 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 236 carolb 04-Jun-09 21:23
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 171 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 238 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 206 Milo 04-Jun-09 22:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 210 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 173 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 185 carolb 04-Jun-09 23:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 214 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:33
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:35
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 221 Tom Hebert 02-Jun-09 18:11
jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 212 Eddie Larry 03-Jun-09 04:44
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 243 Susan Doris 03-Jun-09 08:40
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 212 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 01:13
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 157 Tom Hebert 03-Jun-09 10:31
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 204 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:15
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 233 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:16
Jesus was not a myth 212 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:18
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 240 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 178 Diomede 04-Jun-09 00:11
For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 200 David L 04-Jun-09 02:34
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 196 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:38
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 214 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:10
Jesus 232 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:14
Diabolical Mimicry 222 Deep1 04-Jun-09 21:11
Re: Diabolical Mimicry 215 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:15
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 187 Enigcom 05-Jun-09 17:43
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 173 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 217 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 178 deeside 06-Jun-09 19:42
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 228 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:07
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 219 deeside 06-Jun-09 20:47
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 241 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:51
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 238 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:08
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 194 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 224 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 198 deeside 07-Jun-09 09:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 221 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 221 childinthesun 07-Jun-09 17:02
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 206 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 217 ariston 07-Jun-09 17:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 226 Milo 07-Jun-09 18:05
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 194 deeside 08-Jun-09 14:46
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 197 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:57
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 242 deeside 08-Jun-09 21:32
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 223 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:21
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 220 ariston 06-Jun-09 20:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 171 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 236 deeside 07-Jun-09 21:24
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 204 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 197 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 00:23
jesus was there... 212 shazaman 09-Jun-09 09:54
Re: jesus was there... 218 papalou 11-Jun-09 02:08
Re: jesus was there... 194 Milo 11-Jun-09 08:46
Re: jesus was there... 188 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 09:38
Re: jesus was there... 207 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:14
Re: jesus was there... 192 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:37
Re: jesus was there... 224 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 11:32
Re: jesus was there... 251 Milo 11-Jun-09 13:17
Re: jesus was there... 208 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 19:56
Re: jesus was there... 207 Milo 11-Jun-09 21:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 211 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 15:36


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.