Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R and M wrote:

> That is your interpretation of what I have written. As I
> previously stated "these" holy writings have been used by
> perverts from time immemorial.....nothing new here, just a new
> set of d...........s who happen to think that they can exploit
> the holy information for their own gain.

These perverts you speak of, Wendy, are men who are evil wolves in sheep's clothing.

It's nothing new that wicked people use holy information for their own gain.

Evil perverts use computers and the Internet too pursue their aims and ambitions. What's new in that?

What you're saying is what I'e been saying along!

> > ........not to mention that the forces for this "new world"
> > ambition, and the men behind it, were already in existence long
> > before the prophecies were made.....
>
> So you agree then that these individuals are the ones linked to
> the separation process in consciousness.....the lineage from
> the ancient lines who have always been the ones who have abused
> the spirit! Therefore "they" are part of the number sequences
> that form the prophetic outcomes as a calculation and therefore
> fit perfectly into the
> Armageddon outcome!
>
> Which "seed" do you assume survives, is the obvious statement
> to question that you need to answer! The story already reveals
> this!

The seed that prevails is the seed that's aligned with God's will.

The seed that fails and goes off into destruction and into a dismal violent end, is the seed that is following demonic forces.

> One of the best known Catholic prophets to predict that the
> Pope after John Paul II would be the last was Irishman
> Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair who is better known as simply St.
> Malachy. According to the prophecies of St. Malachy, who was
> born in 1094, the line of Pontiffs has come to an end.
>
> St. Malachy, canonized by by Pope Clement III on July 6, 1199,
> undertook to list in advance the proper succession of Roman
> pontiffs from Celestine II to "the end of the world". St.
> Malachy prophesied that there would be 112 Popes after
> Celestine II. John Paul II, who just died, is number 110. Pope
> number 111 would be the "False Prophet" mentioned in St. John's
> Revelation and who will deliver the Roman Catholic Church to
> Satan.
>
> Number 112 will NOT be a legitimate Pope. It will be the
> "Grand Anti-Pope" or the Anti-Christ who is also known as the
> "Abomination that Causes Desolation" mentioned in Daniel 9:27,
> 11:31, 12:11 and Matthew 24:15 and Mark 13:14. The Prophecies
> of St. Malachy conclude thusly: "In the final persecution of
> the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who
> will feed his flock among many tribulations; after which the
> seven hilled city (Rome) will be destroyed and the dreadful
> Judge will judge the people".
> [www.aztlan.net]

I agree with you, Wendy that the Roman Church is about to meet it's end, and Malachi, IMO, was right, but Christ gave a much more vivid description of how Mystery Babylon will fall.

Some of the songs of the late Bob Marley are also interesting in this regard!

> 7 of course relates to the Giza calculations/Genesis in light
> and hill/mound/mountain = the Law where God sits/strikes upon
> it.
>
> Lyrics to Tuesday's Dead :
> If I make a mark in time, I can't say the mark is mine.
> I'm only the underline of the word.
> Yes, I'm like him, just like you, I can't tell you what to do.
> Like everybody else I'm searching thru what I've heard.
>
> Whoa, Where do you go? When you don't want no one to know?
> Who told tomorrow Tuesday's dead
>
> Oh preacher won't you paint my dream, won't you show me where
> you've been
> Show me what I haven't seen to ease my mind.
> Cause I will learn to understand, if I have a helping hand.
> I wouldn't make another demand all my life.
>
> What's my sex, what's my name, all in all it's all the same.
> Everybody plays a different game, that is all.
> Now, man may live, man may die searching for the question why.
> But if he tries to rule the sky he must fall.
>
> Now every second on the nose, the humdrum of the city grows.
> Reaching out beyond the throes of our time.
> We must try to shake it down. Do our best to break the ground.
> Try to turn the world around one more time.
> Yeah, we must try to shake it down do our best to break the
> ground
> Try to turn the world around one more time
> [ Tuesday's Dead Lyrics on [www.lyricsmania.com] ]

It's an on going pursuit!

> Going into the ancient documents and the Matriarch we find:-
> Kali is one of the most misunderstood forms of God. The
> ordinary Western mind perceives Kali as hideous and absurd,
> forgetting that some of the symbols of Western faiths have the
> same effect on the Hindu. While Christians believe in a God
> that is all good and a devil that is all bad, Hindus believe in
> only one Universal Power which is beyond good and bad.

Wendy, you are making sweeping generalisations... the type of sweeping generalisations that I very much dislike.

Not all Christians believe that God and the Devil are two forces that have their own sources of power.

For your information, I believe that there is only one force and that is God because all power originates from God. The Devil has no energy source of his own, and the same goes for evil. Evil is simply the pervertion of God's power, and this explains why, in every final battle, good will triumph over evil. Evil simply has no power of its own. Evil agencies can only leech power like a vampire than needs blood to survive and function.

> Kali is the full picture of the Universal Power. She is Mother,
> the Benign, and Mother, the Terrible. She creates and nourishes
> and she kills and destroys. By Her magic we see good and bad,
> but in reality there is neither. The whole world and all we see
> is the play of Maya, the veiling power of the Divine Mother.
> God is neither good nor bad, nor both. God is beyond the pair
> of opposites which constitute this relative existence.

I agree that God is beyond duality. It is only parts of his creation that has rebelled and followed his or her own will in order to create evil.

God is pure love and goodness. It is only certain men and certain fallen divine beings that have decided, through the limited power of free will, to perform acts of evil.

> Kali ("the black one") is the Hindu mother goddess, symbol of
> dissolution and destruction. She destroys ignorance, maintains
> the world order, and blesses and frees those who strive for the
> knowledge of God. In the Vedas the name is associated with
> Agni, the god of fire, who had seven flickering tongues of
> flame, of which Kali was the black, horrible tongue. This
> meaning of the word has meanwhile been replaced by the goddess
> Kali, the grim consort of Shiva.
> Her appearance is fearsome: baleful eyes, a protruding tongue,
> and four arms. In her upper left hand she wields a bloody sword
> and in her lower left hand she holds the severed head of a
> demon
> [www.geocities.com]
>
> Her garland of course is SKULLS, because the origins to the
> time calculus relate to the bodies of time who die in the
> process of the next body in time = reincarnation. SKULL =
> BONES OF THE MOTHER, Goddess time calculations.

I disagree with you about this so-called "Mother" you speak of. She is corrupt and has followed a corrupt course of action.

> King James Bible 14.10
> And he sent, and beheaded John in the prison.
>
> Matthew 14:9 Although he was grieved, the king commanded it to
> be given because of his oaths, and because of his dinner
> guests.
> Matthew 14:11 And his head was brought on a platter and given
> to the girl, and she brought it to her mother.
> = LAST SUPPER IN TIME EQUATION.
>
> J being a letter that was added on from the letter I = IO
> (horns/arc).

I haven't a clue what you're going on about in your above comments.

> End of time is the fight between the first Holy spirit body and
> the Demon, as a clashing of the 2 sides in energy forming the O
> total head statement in time. Armageddon in Time clarifies
> that the balance is no longer met and hence in light
> destruction of the natural resources takes place......just as
> it has always done in the time parallels.
>
> Thus as the Roman Scribes knew, they could count up to the time
> when this destruction would take place, because it IS a time
> calculation. It displays that letters = the anagrams that form
> a statement of prophecy that just happen to align to letters =
> Number sequences.
>
> Numbers of course come from out of the Wilderness = 0, hence
> when the wave in time re-emerges in the Universal Quantum, as
> the Mayan's displayed. The Sacred Tree "roots into the centre
> of the Earth".
>
> Their star player VUCUB-CAQUIX bent the rules and cut off
> HUN-HUNAHPU's head. The referee didn't like to say anything or
> even admit to being there. And who can blame him? (American
> pie = the players tried to take the field, the marching band
> refused to yield.....do you recall what was revealed the DAY
> THE MUSIC DIED!)
>
> VUCUB-CAQUIX hung the head on a calabash tree. One day an
> Underworld lass called XQUIC fancied a calabash and picked what
> was left of HUN-HUNAHPU by mistake.
> [www.godchecker.com]
>
> SEE ART and how symbolism is represented, why "alien" can be
> identified as universal symbols to the coming event horizon
> [www.edensart.com]
>
> WAR OF THE WORLDS - SPIDER WEAVER ANCIENT STORIES -
> MAGNETOSPHERE MONSTER = death ray
> [www.webwombat.com.au]
>
> SEE MERCURY
> [www.sciencedaily.com]
>
> As one of the five "moving stars" or "planets", Mercury's name
> is the origin of "Wednesday." In French, this is 'mercredi',
> coming from the Latin 'Mercurii dies', or Mercury's day
> [www.hermograph.com]
>
> 7 = the DAY OF THE HOLY SABBATH.
>
> BAS BATH = the "watering" and baptism originally the HOLY FIRE!
>
> See the meanings for BASe and you have the many symbols written
> about in the Holy storylines
> [ardictionary.com]
> So besides these symbols and reference to low moral character
> (devil/satan) we also find that it relates to "prisoner", also
> the fallen angel imprisoned within the middle of the
> Earth.......where the Tree is Rooted = Tree of Life.
>
> In the Biblical Text we find 2 references to Jesus as a
> prisoner at the BAR, and 1 is released. This is where we find
> another reference to the conflict of energy between 2 forces
> within and held in a stone cavity or dungeon as prisons were.
> A rustic play; -- called also prisoner's base, prison base, or
> bars
> [thinkexist.com]
>
> It is also a spiritual reference "to debase", which is what has
> happened to these spiritual teachings on Earth, hence those who
> have debased them and the spirit of the Christ get what is
> going to be returned. This is KARMA as K = the 1,000 Hebrew
> symbol of Aleph as a previous ancient sanction + ARM = the
> many arms of GOD.
>
> The
> blades[www.barbariangroup.com]
>
>
> "Good bye Yellow Brick Road"....when are you going to come
> down, when are you going to land.....I'm not a present = EL +
> TON JOHN. You can't nab me in your PENTHOUSE = the White
> House. SEE UNIVERSAL CODEX Mother Goddess predictions for
> America!
>
> SPIRIT of the Heavens = Alpha time predictions from the
> beginning to the end.

You seem to have gone off into one of your convoluted ramblings that amounts to jibberish.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 361 shamanaut 30-May-09 16:38
The work of Acharya S has been debunked 231 Milo 30-May-09 17:13
Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 179 shamanaut 30-May-09 23:14
Obviously Achyara supporters are going to Gawf 204 Milo 31-May-09 00:16
I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 212 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:15
Re: I cant debate with 'Faith' logic. 189 Milo 31-May-09 16:24
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 222 David L 02-Jun-09 04:31
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 216 Milo 02-Jun-09 09:41
Re: Obviously Christians are going to Gawf 178 David L 03-Jun-09 04:48
Everyone on this forum has different beliefs to the next poster anyway 198 Milo 03-Jun-09 09:50
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 202 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:02
Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 246 Milo 31-May-09 01:10
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 173 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:02
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 190 Milo 31-May-09 02:23
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 178 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:06
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 189 Milo 31-May-09 03:18
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 182 Eddie Larry 31-May-09 03:33
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 183 Milo 31-May-09 03:47
Re: Nazareth - Archeological Evidence 188 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:44
Plagiarism 206 Milo 31-May-09 11:12
Re: Plagiarism 187 David Campbell 31-May-09 17:14
Re: Plagiarism 207 Milo 31-May-09 17:31
Re: Plagiarism 227 Lee McGiffen 03-Jun-09 14:08
Re: Plagiarism 159 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:48
Re: Plagiarism 202 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:29
Re: Plagiarism 210 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:34
Demons 191 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:40
Re: Demons 160 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 02:50
Re: Demons 190 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:03
Re: Plagiarism 190 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:07
Re: Plagiarism 168 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 05:23
Re: Plagiarism 189 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:14
Re: Plagiarism 207 Lee McGiffen 04-Jun-09 12:30
Re: Plagiarism 184 Milo 04-Jun-09 12:35
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 186 papalou 03-Jun-09 23:03
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 192 Milo 03-Jun-09 23:09
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 219 papalou 04-Jun-09 18:01
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 170 Milo 04-Jun-09 18:57
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 170 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 19:06
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 177 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:40
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 171 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:41
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 190 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 08:25
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 210 Milo 08-Jun-09 12:42
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 160 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 13:49
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 231 Milo 08-Jun-09 13:53
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 208 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 14:44
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 190 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:52
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 205 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 15:23
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 222 Milo 08-Jun-09 15:32
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 180 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:14
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 185 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:21
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 146 martinpescatore 08-Jun-09 16:31
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 171 Milo 08-Jun-09 16:34
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 185 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:13
Re: The work of Acharya S has been debunked 174 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 204 David Campbell 31-May-09 00:42
The Underlying Agenda 177 Milo 31-May-09 01:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 215 David Campbell 31-May-09 01:18
Re: The Underlying Agenda 194 Milo 31-May-09 01:27
O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 162 Milo 31-May-09 01:48
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 189 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:41
Re: O wunden, wundenwoller heilige Speer! 154 Milo 31-May-09 02:44
Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 189 Milo 31-May-09 02:52
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 158 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:58
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 215 Milo 31-May-09 04:11
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 210 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:22
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 193 Milo 31-May-09 04:31
Re: Herodias, Magdalen and Prakriti 216 Milo 31-May-09 04:34
Re: The Underlying Agenda 205 David Campbell 31-May-09 02:28
Re: The Underlying Agenda 199 Milo 31-May-09 02:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 185 David Campbell 31-May-09 03:03
Re: The Underlying Agenda 208 Milo 31-May-09 03:20
Re: The Underlying Agenda 187 David Campbell 31-May-09 04:11
Re: The Underlying Agenda 226 Milo 31-May-09 04:29
Re: The Underlying Agenda 182 The Kwuda 01-Jun-09 17:43
Re: The Underlying Agenda 189 Milo 01-Jun-09 19:14
Re: The Underlying Agenda 183 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 10:55
Re: The Underlying Agenda 174 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:09
Re: The Underlying Agenda 172 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:40
Re: The Underlying Agenda 221 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The Underlying Agenda 158 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:51
Re: The Underlying Agenda 216 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:42
Re: The Underlying Agenda 197 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:16
Re: The Underlying Agenda 180 Milo 02-Jun-09 22:04
Re: The Underlying Agenda 218 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:47
source of my quote 189 shamanaut 31-May-09 16:48
Re: source of my quote 202 Milo 31-May-09 17:27
Re: source of my quote 191 Milo 31-May-09 17:40
Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 Raja 01-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 202 R and M 02-Jun-09 09:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 198 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:04
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 174 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 214 R and M 03-Jun-09 04:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 173 The Kwuda 04-Jun-09 06:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 212 Milo 04-Jun-09 10:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 166 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:34
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 178 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 207 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:40
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 184 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 163 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:46
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 167 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:39
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:41
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 170 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:45
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 178 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:47
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 168 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:48
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 191 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 186 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 179 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 184 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 158 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:53
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 166 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:55
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:56
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 193 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:58
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 188 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 185 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:01
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 229 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:03
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 161 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:06
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 179 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:09
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 153 The Kwuda 06-Jun-09 00:13
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 Milo 06-Jun-09 00:28
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 208 R and M 04-Jun-09 10:49
The two seeds of Genesis 3 169 Milo 04-Jun-09 11:39
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 178 R and M 05-Jun-09 05:47
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 188 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:21
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 209 R and M 05-Jun-09 13:29
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 186 ariston 05-Jun-09 13:41
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 165 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:14
correction... 165 Milo 05-Jun-09 14:16
Re: correction... 160 ariston 05-Jun-09 14:39
Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 214 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:01
correction... 179 Milo 05-Jun-09 15:45
Re: correction... 168 ariston 05-Jun-09 18:16
Re: correction... 204 Milo 05-Jun-09 22:30
Re: correction... 211 ariston 06-Jun-09 02:19
Re: correction... 188 Milo 06-Jun-09 03:00
Re: correction... 156 ariston 06-Jun-09 04:12
Re: correction... 182 Milo 06-Jun-09 04:23
Re: correction... 187 Eddie Larry 07-Jun-09 15:23
Re: correction... 187 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:42
Re: correction... 218 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 02:50
Re: correction... 202 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:19
Re: correction... 151 Eddie Larry 10-Jun-09 00:50
Re: correction... 197 Milo 10-Jun-09 05:02
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 193 papalou 07-Jun-09 22:53
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 184 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:15
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 199 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:45
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 229 papalou 07-Jun-09 23:24
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 180 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:48
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 182 papalou 09-Jun-09 04:18
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 213 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:20
Re: Ying and Yang is a flawed philosophy 156 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:44
Re: The two seeds of Genesis 3 203 R and M 06-Jun-09 07:54
ABC 215 Milo 06-Jun-09 12:36
Re: the end 217 R and M 07-Jun-09 10:12
Re: the end 185 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:20
Re: the end 170 R and M 08-Jun-09 07:15
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:00
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 205 Milo 02-Jun-09 11:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 179 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:37
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 190 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 11:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 157 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 Milo 02-Jun-09 13:43
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 157 The Kwuda 02-Jun-09 17:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 shamanaut 03-Jun-09 17:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 180 Milo 03-Jun-09 21:50
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 179 Raja 04-Jun-09 07:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 241 Aine 04-Jun-09 15:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 192 Milo 04-Jun-09 19:07
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 263 Aine 04-Jun-09 19:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 207 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:31
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 158 martinpescatore 04-Jun-09 21:20
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 148 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:26
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 199 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 06:18
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 218 Milo 05-Jun-09 10:22
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 204 martinpescatore 05-Jun-09 20:16
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 162 Raja 05-Jun-09 21:10
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 197 carolb 04-Jun-09 20:19
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 200 Milo 04-Jun-09 20:35
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 209 carolb 04-Jun-09 21:23
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 147 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:30
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 216 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:44
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 187 Milo 04-Jun-09 22:51
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 188 carolb 04-Jun-09 22:59
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 147 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:02
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 158 carolb 04-Jun-09 23:14
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 191 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:33
Re: Here's the firebrigade, fire turns to smoke... 187 Milo 04-Jun-09 23:35
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 199 Tom Hebert 02-Jun-09 18:11
jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 189 Eddie Larry 03-Jun-09 04:44
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 212 Susan Doris 03-Jun-09 08:40
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 189 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 01:13
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 138 Tom Hebert 03-Jun-09 10:31
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 180 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:15
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 205 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:16
Jesus was not a myth 190 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:18
Re: jesus was a man; Jesus was a myth 211 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 151 Diomede 04-Jun-09 00:11
For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 176 David L 04-Jun-09 02:34
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 173 Milo 04-Jun-09 02:38
Re: For a guy who never existed, he gets a lot of attention on the GHMB 194 Eddie Larry 04-Jun-09 03:10
Jesus 197 Milo 04-Jun-09 03:14
Diabolical Mimicry 200 Deep1 04-Jun-09 21:11
Re: Diabolical Mimicry 194 Milo 04-Jun-09 21:15
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 161 Enigcom 05-Jun-09 17:43
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 151 The Kwuda 05-Jun-09 23:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 196 Milo 05-Jun-09 23:50
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 159 deeside 06-Jun-09 19:42
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 209 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:07
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 204 deeside 06-Jun-09 20:47
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 224 Milo 06-Jun-09 20:51
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 215 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:08
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 174 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:18
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 203 deeside 06-Jun-09 21:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 176 deeside 07-Jun-09 09:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 197 Milo 07-Jun-09 11:16
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 199 childinthesun 07-Jun-09 17:02
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 183 Milo 07-Jun-09 17:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 196 ariston 07-Jun-09 17:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 204 Milo 07-Jun-09 18:05
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 170 deeside 08-Jun-09 14:46
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 181 Milo 08-Jun-09 14:57
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 220 deeside 08-Jun-09 21:32
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 198 Milo 09-Jun-09 05:21
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 199 ariston 06-Jun-09 20:52
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 151 Milo 06-Jun-09 21:25
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 212 deeside 07-Jun-09 21:24
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 179 Milo 08-Jun-09 04:49
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 172 Eddie Larry 09-Jun-09 00:23
jesus was there... 191 shazaman 09-Jun-09 09:54
Re: jesus was there... 195 papalou 11-Jun-09 02:08
Re: jesus was there... 173 Milo 11-Jun-09 08:46
Re: jesus was there... 168 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 09:38
Re: jesus was there... 181 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:14
Re: jesus was there... 169 Milo 11-Jun-09 10:37
Re: jesus was there... 201 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 11:32
Re: jesus was there... 227 Milo 11-Jun-09 13:17
Re: jesus was there... 183 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 19:56
Re: jesus was there... 183 Milo 11-Jun-09 21:44
Re: Was Jesus a Myth? Blog of Acharya S 191 martinpescatore 11-Jun-09 15:36


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.