Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log In• Register
Go to: Forum Home•Board•New Topic•Search
Re: Hancock and Hawass
Author: Me ()
Date: February 18, 2008 01:27AM
solitaire wrote:

> Good post Mr Hunter.
>
> I think that 'Khufu' refers to a God/King from the Zep Tepi-
> the' glorious first time'.
>
If Khufu was a ruler from Zep tepi, wouldn't his name appear on the earliest kings lists amongst the names of Ra, Thoth, etc?

Options: Reply•Quote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 665 loveritas 29-Jan-08 11:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 399 Raja 29-Jan-08 12:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 370 Graham Hancock 29-Jan-08 13:31
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 400 turnofthetide 29-Jan-08 16:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 364 Raja 29-Jan-08 17:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 370 Oddity 29-Jan-08 17:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 319 Houcad 29-Jan-08 17:51
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 398 Raja 29-Jan-08 17:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 364 Houcad 30-Jan-08 12:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 425 Raja 30-Jan-08 12:37
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 352 solitaire 29-Jan-08 17:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 380 Warwick 29-Jan-08 18:05
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 397 solitaire 29-Jan-08 20:36
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 387 Warwick 30-Jan-08 16:14
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 399 gulsbo 30-Jan-08 20:09
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 414 Thunderbird 29-Jan-08 20:16
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 304 Jon B 29-Jan-08 20:56
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 371 Thunderbird 29-Jan-08 22:28
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 352 Jon B 30-Jan-08 07:31
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 280 Raja 29-Jan-08 21:10
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 362 Me 29-Jan-08 23:49
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 397 Raja 30-Jan-08 07:20
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 365 Me 31-Jan-08 00:20
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 361 Raja 31-Jan-08 01:54
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 371 Me 31-Jan-08 19:12
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 420 Raja 31-Jan-08 19:22
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 335 Warwick 01-Feb-08 17:34
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 338 Raja 01-Feb-08 19:02
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 390 Warwick 01-Feb-08 19:43
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 351 Raja 01-Feb-08 20:34
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 415 Warwick 01-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 378 Raja 02-Feb-08 07:29
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 373 Raja 02-Feb-08 08:43
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 405 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:27
Re: Inventory Stela 355 Thunderbird 30-Jan-08 02:55
Re: Inventory Stela 434 Raja 30-Jan-08 12:17
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 383 bofl 30-Jan-08 00:14
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 464 Scott Creighton 29-Jan-08 18:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 383 Daz407 29-Jan-08 18:48
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 423 gulsbo 29-Jan-08 19:42
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 391 Me 29-Jan-08 23:53
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 377 MALaclypse 30-Jan-08 06:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 341 gulsbo 30-Jan-08 12:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 360 Me 31-Jan-08 00:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 376 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 15:47
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 381 Me 31-Jan-08 19:17
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 369 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 19:28
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 316 Raja 31-Jan-08 19:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 413 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 20:13
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 366 ninja 30-Jan-08 23:29
How convenient... 413 Nejc 30-Jan-08 11:56
Re: How convenient... 377 damthatbeaver 31-Jan-08 04:37
Re: How convenient... 336 Warwick 31-Jan-08 16:18
Re: How convenient... 396 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 20:11
Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 401 Citizen Attorney 31-Jan-08 01:41
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 400 Raja 31-Jan-08 02:24
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 375 Warwick 31-Jan-08 16:27
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 394 Citizen Attorney 02-Feb-08 15:10
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 403 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:35
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 400 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 02:16
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 346 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 17:30
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 348 Raja 03-Feb-08 18:20
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 370 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 22:58
Quotation please 326 Warwick 04-Feb-08 21:29
Re: Quotation please 339 Citizen Attorney 05-Feb-08 02:32
Re: Quotation please 345 Warwick 05-Feb-08 17:33
Re: Quotation please 365 Raja 05-Feb-08 20:08
Re: Quotation please 360 Warwick 05-Feb-08 21:34
Re: Quotation please 305 Raja 05-Feb-08 21:50
Re: Quotation please 348 Me 06-Feb-08 01:09
Re: Quotation please 395 MALaclypse 06-Feb-08 02:32
Re: Quotation please 375 Warwick 07-Feb-08 00:24
Re: Quotation please 339 Citizen Attorney 06-Feb-08 02:09
Re: Quotation please 353 Citizen Attorney 07-Feb-08 03:44
Re: Quotation please 352 Warwick 09-Feb-08 00:47
Re: Quotation please 386 Ahatmose 09-Feb-08 01:11
Re: Quotation please 226 Warwick 09-Feb-08 01:32
Re: Quotation please 373 Ahatmose 09-Feb-08 01:44
Re: Quotation please 344 Warwick 09-Feb-08 02:38
Re: Quotation please 336 damthatbeaver 09-Feb-08 02:18
hoist on his own petard 372 Warwick 09-Feb-08 02:49
The "A" word. 386 Raja 09-Feb-08 04:50
Re: The "A" word. 367 Warwick 10-Feb-08 04:50
Re: The "A" word. 344 Raja 10-Feb-08 13:32
Re: The "A" word. 255 Warwick 10-Feb-08 19:44
The end. 361 Raja 10-Feb-08 20:37
Re: The end. 344 Warwick 10-Feb-08 21:26
Re: hoist on his own petard 352 damthatbeaver 09-Feb-08 10:37
Re: hoist on his own petard 375 Me 10-Feb-08 00:54
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 355 Daz407 31-Jan-08 18:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 337 loveritas 01-Feb-08 11:39
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 364 Warwick 01-Feb-08 17:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 361 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 10:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 368 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 11:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 363 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 11:33
Re: Hancock and Hawass 362 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 12:21
Re: Hancock and Hawass 374 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 13:11
Re: Hancock and Hawass 354 The Elim 02-Feb-08 14:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 329 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 15:07
Re: Hancock and Hawass 360 The Elim 02-Feb-08 15:36
Re: Hancock and Hawass 413 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 17:33
Re: Hancock and Hawass 365 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:44
Re: Hancock and Hawass 368 Raja 02-Feb-08 17:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass 404 Warwick 02-Feb-08 18:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass 363 Raja 02-Feb-08 18:37
Re: Hancock and Hawass 404 Warwick 02-Feb-08 19:15
Re: Hancock and Hawass 325 Raja 02-Feb-08 19:34
Re: Hancock and Hawass 352 Warwick 02-Feb-08 20:11
Re: Hancock and Hawass 337 Me 03-Feb-08 00:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass 430 Raja 03-Feb-08 04:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass 408 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 19:44
Re: Hancock and Hawass 381 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:34
Re: Hancock and Hawass 343 Jon B 02-Feb-08 20:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 378 Warwick 02-Feb-08 21:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass 317 gulsbo 03-Feb-08 18:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass 394 Warwick 04-Feb-08 21:32
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 341 William Glyn-Jones 05-Feb-08 11:13
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 340 Houcad 29-Jan-08 13:51
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 362 damthatbeaver 31-Jan-08 04:19
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 354 Houcad 31-Jan-08 05:08
Re: Hancock and Hawass 405 Robert Bauval 03-Feb-08 10:02
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 375 mt20tyom 03-Feb-08 20:19
Re: Hancock and Hawass 366 solitaire 03-Feb-08 20:57
Re: Graffiti 419 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 18:47
Re: Graffiti 374 Raja 04-Feb-08 21:33
Re: Graffiti 430 Martin Stower 15-Feb-08 18:47
Re: Hancock and Hawass 403 Martin Stower 15-Feb-08 18:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 359 solitaire 16-Feb-08 03:15
Re: Hancock and Hawass 342 Martin Stower 16-Feb-08 22:58
Re: Hancock and Hawass 245 Warwick 17-Feb-08 19:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass 340 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 21:09
Re: Hancock and Hawass 348 Mr. Hunter 17-Feb-08 20:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass 377 solitaire 17-Feb-08 21:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 335 Martin Stower 17-Feb-08 23:41
Re: Hancock and Hawass 266 solitaire 18-Feb-08 01:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 360 Warwick 18-Feb-08 01:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass 342 solitaire 18-Feb-08 02:48
Alpha and Omega 414 Warwick 18-Feb-08 18:49
Re: Alpha and Omega 354 Me 18-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Alpha and Omega 366 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 20:58
Re: Alpha and Omega 366 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:21
Re: Alpha and Omega 385 Martin Stower 20-Feb-08 19:41
Re: Alpha and Omega 405 Warwick 21-Feb-08 15:29
Re: Alpha and Omega 398 Martin Stower 22-Feb-08 16:14
Re: Alpha and Omega 370 Warwick 23-Feb-08 16:55
Re: Hancock and Hawass 338 ninja 18-Feb-08 10:20
Re: Hancock and Hawass 395 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 19:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass 340 The Elim 18-Feb-08 20:20
Re: Hancock and Hawass 376 Me 18-Feb-08 01:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 382 damthatbeaver 17-Feb-08 21:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 399 damthatbeaver 04-Feb-08 06:07
Re: Hancock and Hawass 366 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 07:12
Re: Hancock and Hawass 360 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 17:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass 415 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 20:57
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 371 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 20:46
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 332 Archae Solenhofen 04-Feb-08 21:51
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 376 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 23:57
Alford's refuation of Sitchin 362 Citizen Attorney 04-Feb-08 13:46
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 438 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 376 Raja 04-Feb-08 21:48
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 393 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 18:48
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 400 Eddie Larry 13-Feb-08 04:00
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 330 damthatbeaver 05-Feb-08 01:50
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 349 Warwick 05-Feb-08 17:37
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 365 Me 05-Feb-08 19:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 242 damthatbeaver 06-Feb-08 01:07
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 261 Me 06-Feb-08 01:11
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 339 damthatbeaver 06-Feb-08 06:13
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 408 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 19:01
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 366 gulsbo 11-Feb-08 20:58
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 423 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 21:17
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 431 gulsbo 12-Feb-08 20:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 420 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-08 23:05
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 434 gulsbo 13-Feb-08 21:06
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 damthatbeaver 14-Feb-08 03:09
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 385 JonnyMcA 14-Feb-08 10:47
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 328 Me 14-Feb-08 23:40
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 424 gulsbo 15-Feb-08 21:06
Zahi defends a world that fears and detests him 361 Me 16-Feb-08 01:05
Re: Zahi defends a world that fears and detests him 314 gulsbo 16-Feb-08 15:53
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 327 damthatbeaver 16-Feb-08 10:51
entertainment vs. enlightenment 371 drrayeye 11-Feb-08 23:35
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 357 Me 12-Feb-08 01:22
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 420 Warwick 12-Feb-08 15:27
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 346 MALaclypse 12-Feb-08 20:46
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 342 Warwick 12-Feb-08 22:42
Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 367 Me 13-Feb-08 00:53
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 337 Warwick 13-Feb-08 17:15
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 359 Me 13-Feb-08 19:42
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 418 Warwick 14-Feb-08 16:35
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 408 Me 14-Feb-08 23:44
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 382 Warwick 15-Feb-08 00:16
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 399 richarddullum 13-Feb-08 19:56
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 363 Me 14-Feb-08 00:09
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 448 richarddullum 14-Feb-08 02:40
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 351 damthatbeaver 14-Feb-08 03:22
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 371 Me 14-Feb-08 23:47
It was KHUFU 101: 379 Warwick 14-Feb-08 16:48
Re: It was KHUFU 101: 382 richarddullum 15-Feb-08 02:44
Re: It was KHUFU 101: 376 Warwick 15-Feb-08 18:04
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 407 gulsbo 13-Feb-08 21:18
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 309 Warwick 14-Feb-08 17:09
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 363 gulsbo 15-Feb-08 21:21
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 406 MALaclypse 13-Feb-08 03:13
excavations reveal bones... 349 Ghia 06-Feb-08 02:35
Re: excavations reveal bones... 422 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 19:02
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 352 Warwick 07-Feb-08 00:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 365 Citizen Attorney 07-Feb-08 03:23
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 351 Warwick 07-Feb-08 17:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 375 Virgo 08-Feb-08 16:24
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 383 Warwick 09-Feb-08 00:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 375 Me 10-Feb-08 00:58
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 436 Warwick 10-Feb-08 04:51
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 387 The Elim 11-Feb-08 03:07
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 359 Citizen Attorney 09-Feb-08 05:33
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 307 Virgo 11-Feb-08 17:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 367 richarddullum 12-Feb-08 18:22
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 Virgo 13-Feb-08 08:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 399 richarddullum 13-Feb-08 15:31
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 365 Me 13-Feb-08 19:49
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 321 Virgo 14-Feb-08 09:24
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 393 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 02:50
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 384 richarddullum 15-Feb-08 02:57
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 402 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 03:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 Virgo 15-Feb-08 10:02
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 378 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 14:20
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 367 richarddullum 16-Feb-08 01:55
Re: Hancock and Hawass 356 Houcad 04-Feb-08 20:08


Go to: Forum Home•Board•Search•Log In•Register
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Click here to login