> I'm not trying to close the debate. I was just commenting on
> your trying to disqualify Lehner's opinion because you say he
> proffited by changing his mind.If you don[t feven know what an
> ad hominem argument is???
Mark Lehner is allowed to change his mind any time he wants, actually I didn't say he profited by it in that sense, those are your words.
> Why in the world do you rely so heavily on one???
Well, Lehner did, so why can't I ? He even wrote a book! :-)
> You jump from one salient point to another regardless of the
> actual topic of the thread. In this thread the topic if the
> integrity and reliablity of Hawass, Lehner and.... unbelievably
> considering that this is his website ...Hancock himself.
Actually someone else started this thread asking for more clarity in the case. I just added the Inventory Stela because if you do a search you'll find many different opinions about it, and not all conclude that it contains erroneous information (page 39, The Complete Pyramids) as Lehner and collegues do.
and here's GH's statement again for you; [www.grahamhancock.com]
> as I said above, and with all due respect. if you cannot
> follow the discussion ....why participate in it???
then why do you keep responding to my posts? Some choose to ignore "pyramidiots"... :-)