Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello Amy

So ya....an Egyptian artifact designates Khufu as doing restoration and hinting that he is not the builder of the GP,

and suddenly.......Egyptologists acknowledge the Inventory Stela,......but conclude its a smear campaign by Priests of th 26th Dynasty,

how convenient : )....answer for everything ...and the Original Time line continues : )
From my perch,....this relentless attempt to make the timeline survive the question period of peer review...and non peer review is the suspect item at the crux of the matter.

They will not bend,....well...just a little,...as Schoch mentions,....they offer up
Khufu as builder of the Sphinx instead of Chefra.

Maybe Hawass will recant Giza as Rostau,...
recant his testimony of Tunnels under Giza,

That would leave us with Vyse and blown out chambers,....and Grafitti gang.
How can we prove that Labor crews do not draw Royal Cartouches,....or draw them this badly ? : ) : )

The overall picture is the answer in my thinking,

Sitchins charges,
Schochs findings,
John Anthony West and Schwaller De Lubitz,...and a host of others who do not buy the story any longer.


If the Sphinx was recarved from an extant design as Schoch maintains,
then its possible the Fabulous Khufu's decided to occupy the extant Gizamids and build/restore for fame and glory.

Radedef ...as Sitchin opines is a point of notice,
why did he not occupy an extant pyramid,....why did he build north of Giza?

If the blown out Vyse chamber cartouches and grafitti were reasonable Old Kingdom -red ochre endeavours,

then why did Vyse's contemporaries wonder what in blazes this grotesquely huge..... and untillegable scribble was?

Later.....like the Pope himself absolving sins,
do mainstream forwarders post and publish the rescue of Vyse,
that the grafitti and cartouches are normal to Old Kingdom.

I don't think so!

One theme that Sitchin presents in Forging the Pharaohs name,
and is a hammer in my opinion,
is that...the Fabulous Khufu's were indeed found in all manner of script and period servant/gov offical designates outside the pyramids.
as mentioned,......no doubt they built and restored things in their day,
no doubt a gov/working class can be found outside the pyramids from workers graves and housing to gov and near royal level tomb/mastabas.

that only proves that the Fabulous khufu's were building on site,
it does not validate them building the 3 Gizamids.
it more likely validates the restoration project,
and tease's us towards Sitchins opine,

That the Fabulous Khufu's [Minus Radedef]
occupied the extant Giza Plateau and enlarged their names by doing so.
Can we say Preists were involved?

Maybe the Fabulous Khufu's never engratiated themselves by restoring Isis's Mountain,
maybe they just restored and added to the site,......and I am owing them an apology for collusion.
maybe later period Priests altered the history....
maybe its just the current age Egyptologists who are decieving us.

The Sphinx stands as testimony that things are not what they appear to be as stated by mainstream.

so ya.......Schoch and Schwaller De Lubitz/West are right

or Hawass and anyone who posts articles about mile long ramps at Giza : )

The Inventory Stela is marginalized,......just as Schochs findiings are,

Is there a pattern here : )


T Bird [After Hawass.....I'll never wear Raybans again : )]


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 666 loveritas 29-Jan-08 11:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 400 Raja 29-Jan-08 12:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 371 Graham Hancock 29-Jan-08 13:31
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 401 turnofthetide 29-Jan-08 16:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 364 Raja 29-Jan-08 17:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 370 Oddity 29-Jan-08 17:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 320 Houcad 29-Jan-08 17:51
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 399 Raja 29-Jan-08 17:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 365 Houcad 30-Jan-08 12:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 426 Raja 30-Jan-08 12:37
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 352 solitaire 29-Jan-08 17:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 380 Warwick 29-Jan-08 18:05
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 397 solitaire 29-Jan-08 20:36
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 388 Warwick 30-Jan-08 16:14
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 399 gulsbo 30-Jan-08 20:09
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 415 Thunderbird 29-Jan-08 20:16
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 305 Jon B 29-Jan-08 20:56
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 372 Thunderbird 29-Jan-08 22:28
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 353 Jon B 30-Jan-08 07:31
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 281 Raja 29-Jan-08 21:10
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 363 Me 29-Jan-08 23:49
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 398 Raja 30-Jan-08 07:20
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 366 Me 31-Jan-08 00:20
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 362 Raja 31-Jan-08 01:54
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 371 Me 31-Jan-08 19:12
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 421 Raja 31-Jan-08 19:22
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 336 Warwick 01-Feb-08 17:34
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 340 Raja 01-Feb-08 19:02
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 393 Warwick 01-Feb-08 19:43
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 354 Raja 01-Feb-08 20:34
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 416 Warwick 01-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 379 Raja 02-Feb-08 07:29
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 375 Raja 02-Feb-08 08:43
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict of not guilty 407 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:27
Re: Inventory Stela 355 Thunderbird 30-Jan-08 02:55
Re: Inventory Stela 434 Raja 30-Jan-08 12:17
Re: Evidence that demands a verdict 384 bofl 30-Jan-08 00:14
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 464 Scott Creighton 29-Jan-08 18:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 383 Daz407 29-Jan-08 18:48
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 425 gulsbo 29-Jan-08 19:42
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 391 Me 29-Jan-08 23:53
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 378 MALaclypse 30-Jan-08 06:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 341 gulsbo 30-Jan-08 12:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 361 Me 31-Jan-08 00:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 378 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 15:47
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 382 Me 31-Jan-08 19:17
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 370 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 19:28
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 317 Raja 31-Jan-08 19:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal or no Deal" 414 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 20:13
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 366 ninja 30-Jan-08 23:29
How convenient... 413 Nejc 30-Jan-08 11:56
Re: How convenient... 377 damthatbeaver 31-Jan-08 04:37
Re: How convenient... 337 Warwick 31-Jan-08 16:18
Re: How convenient... 397 gulsbo 31-Jan-08 20:11
Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 401 Citizen Attorney 31-Jan-08 01:41
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 401 Raja 31-Jan-08 02:24
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 375 Warwick 31-Jan-08 16:27
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 394 Citizen Attorney 02-Feb-08 15:10
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 404 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:35
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 401 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 02:16
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 348 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 17:30
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 348 Raja 03-Feb-08 18:20
Re: Is the Grafitti a checkmate for Khufu? 370 Citizen Attorney 03-Feb-08 22:58
Quotation please 326 Warwick 04-Feb-08 21:29
Re: Quotation please 341 Citizen Attorney 05-Feb-08 02:32
Re: Quotation please 346 Warwick 05-Feb-08 17:33
Re: Quotation please 366 Raja 05-Feb-08 20:08
Re: Quotation please 360 Warwick 05-Feb-08 21:34
Re: Quotation please 306 Raja 05-Feb-08 21:50
Re: Quotation please 349 Me 06-Feb-08 01:09
Re: Quotation please 396 MALaclypse 06-Feb-08 02:32
Re: Quotation please 376 Warwick 07-Feb-08 00:24
Re: Quotation please 339 Citizen Attorney 06-Feb-08 02:09
Re: Quotation please 354 Citizen Attorney 07-Feb-08 03:44
Re: Quotation please 354 Warwick 09-Feb-08 00:47
Re: Quotation please 389 Ahatmose 09-Feb-08 01:11
Re: Quotation please 227 Warwick 09-Feb-08 01:32
Re: Quotation please 374 Ahatmose 09-Feb-08 01:44
Re: Quotation please 344 Warwick 09-Feb-08 02:38
Re: Quotation please 336 damthatbeaver 09-Feb-08 02:18
hoist on his own petard 373 Warwick 09-Feb-08 02:49
The "A" word. 386 Raja 09-Feb-08 04:50
Re: The "A" word. 367 Warwick 10-Feb-08 04:50
Re: The "A" word. 345 Raja 10-Feb-08 13:32
Re: The "A" word. 256 Warwick 10-Feb-08 19:44
The end. 361 Raja 10-Feb-08 20:37
Re: The end. 346 Warwick 10-Feb-08 21:26
Re: hoist on his own petard 353 damthatbeaver 09-Feb-08 10:37
Re: hoist on his own petard 376 Me 10-Feb-08 00:54
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 355 Daz407 31-Jan-08 18:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 338 loveritas 01-Feb-08 11:39
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 365 Warwick 01-Feb-08 17:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 362 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 10:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 369 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 11:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 365 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 11:33
Re: Hancock and Hawass 364 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 12:21
Re: Hancock and Hawass 374 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 13:11
Re: Hancock and Hawass 356 The Elim 02-Feb-08 14:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 330 Graham Hancock 02-Feb-08 15:07
Re: Hancock and Hawass 361 The Elim 02-Feb-08 15:36
Re: Hancock and Hawass 414 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 17:33
Re: Hancock and Hawass 365 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:44
Re: Hancock and Hawass 368 Raja 02-Feb-08 17:59
Re: Hancock and Hawass 404 Warwick 02-Feb-08 18:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass 364 Raja 02-Feb-08 18:37
Re: Hancock and Hawass 405 Warwick 02-Feb-08 19:15
Re: Hancock and Hawass 326 Raja 02-Feb-08 19:34
Re: Hancock and Hawass 353 Warwick 02-Feb-08 20:11
Re: Hancock and Hawass 337 Me 03-Feb-08 00:22
Re: Hancock and Hawass 432 Raja 03-Feb-08 04:23
Re: Hancock and Hawass 410 gulsbo 02-Feb-08 19:44
Re: Hancock and Hawass 381 Warwick 02-Feb-08 17:34
Re: Hancock and Hawass 344 Jon B 02-Feb-08 20:29
Re: Hancock and Hawass 379 Warwick 02-Feb-08 21:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass 317 gulsbo 03-Feb-08 18:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass 395 Warwick 04-Feb-08 21:32
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 342 William Glyn-Jones 05-Feb-08 11:13
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 340 Houcad 29-Jan-08 13:51
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 363 damthatbeaver 31-Jan-08 04:19
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 355 Houcad 31-Jan-08 05:08
Re: Hancock and Hawass 407 Robert Bauval 03-Feb-08 10:02
Re: Hancock and Hawass "Deal" 376 mt20tyom 03-Feb-08 20:19
Re: Hancock and Hawass 367 solitaire 03-Feb-08 20:57
Re: Graffiti 420 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 18:47
Re: Graffiti 375 Raja 04-Feb-08 21:33
Re: Graffiti 431 Martin Stower 15-Feb-08 18:47
Re: Hancock and Hawass 404 Martin Stower 15-Feb-08 18:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 359 solitaire 16-Feb-08 03:15
Re: Hancock and Hawass 343 Martin Stower 16-Feb-08 22:58
Re: Hancock and Hawass 245 Warwick 17-Feb-08 19:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass 341 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 21:09
Re: Hancock and Hawass 349 Mr. Hunter 17-Feb-08 20:52
Re: Hancock and Hawass 378 solitaire 17-Feb-08 21:16
Re: Hancock and Hawass 336 Martin Stower 17-Feb-08 23:41
Re: Hancock and Hawass 267 solitaire 18-Feb-08 01:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 362 Warwick 18-Feb-08 01:43
Re: Hancock and Hawass 342 solitaire 18-Feb-08 02:48
Alpha and Omega 414 Warwick 18-Feb-08 18:49
Re: Alpha and Omega 355 Me 18-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Alpha and Omega 367 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 20:58
Re: Alpha and Omega 367 Warwick 19-Feb-08 16:21
Re: Alpha and Omega 386 Martin Stower 20-Feb-08 19:41
Re: Alpha and Omega 407 Warwick 21-Feb-08 15:29
Re: Alpha and Omega 399 Martin Stower 22-Feb-08 16:14
Re: Alpha and Omega 372 Warwick 23-Feb-08 16:55
Re: Hancock and Hawass 339 ninja 18-Feb-08 10:20
Re: Hancock and Hawass 395 Martin Stower 18-Feb-08 19:56
Re: Hancock and Hawass 340 The Elim 18-Feb-08 20:20
Re: Hancock and Hawass 377 Me 18-Feb-08 01:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 382 damthatbeaver 17-Feb-08 21:27
Re: Hancock and Hawass 400 damthatbeaver 04-Feb-08 06:07
Re: Hancock and Hawass 367 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 07:12
Re: Hancock and Hawass 361 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 17:50
Re: Hancock and Hawass 416 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 20:57
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 371 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 20:46
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 333 Archae Solenhofen 04-Feb-08 21:51
Re: Extreme caution part deux : ) 376 Thunderbird 04-Feb-08 23:57
Alford's refuation of Sitchin 363 Citizen Attorney 04-Feb-08 13:46
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 440 Susan Doris 04-Feb-08 20:49
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 376 Raja 04-Feb-08 21:48
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 394 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 18:48
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 400 Eddie Larry 13-Feb-08 04:00
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 331 damthatbeaver 05-Feb-08 01:50
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 350 Warwick 05-Feb-08 17:37
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 366 Me 05-Feb-08 19:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 243 damthatbeaver 06-Feb-08 01:07
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 262 Me 06-Feb-08 01:11
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 340 damthatbeaver 06-Feb-08 06:13
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 408 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 19:01
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 368 gulsbo 11-Feb-08 20:58
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 423 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 21:17
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 432 gulsbo 12-Feb-08 20:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 421 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-08 23:05
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 435 gulsbo 13-Feb-08 21:06
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 361 damthatbeaver 14-Feb-08 03:09
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 387 JonnyMcA 14-Feb-08 10:47
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 331 Me 14-Feb-08 23:40
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 425 gulsbo 15-Feb-08 21:06
Zahi defends a world that fears and detests him 361 Me 16-Feb-08 01:05
Re: Zahi defends a world that fears and detests him 316 gulsbo 16-Feb-08 15:53
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 328 damthatbeaver 16-Feb-08 10:51
entertainment vs. enlightenment 373 drrayeye 11-Feb-08 23:35
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 358 Me 12-Feb-08 01:22
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 422 Warwick 12-Feb-08 15:27
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 346 MALaclypse 12-Feb-08 20:46
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 344 Warwick 12-Feb-08 22:42
Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 367 Me 13-Feb-08 00:53
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 337 Warwick 13-Feb-08 17:15
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 360 Me 13-Feb-08 19:42
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 419 Warwick 14-Feb-08 16:35
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 408 Me 14-Feb-08 23:44
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 382 Warwick 15-Feb-08 00:16
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 401 richarddullum 13-Feb-08 19:56
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 364 Me 14-Feb-08 00:09
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 449 richarddullum 14-Feb-08 02:40
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 352 damthatbeaver 14-Feb-08 03:22
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 371 Me 14-Feb-08 23:47
It was KHUFU 101: 382 Warwick 14-Feb-08 16:48
Re: It was KHUFU 101: 382 richarddullum 15-Feb-08 02:44
Re: It was KHUFU 101: 376 Warwick 15-Feb-08 18:04
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 409 gulsbo 13-Feb-08 21:18
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 310 Warwick 14-Feb-08 17:09
Re: Is Zahi Hawass to blame for rubbish books and TV too? 363 gulsbo 15-Feb-08 21:21
Re: entertainment vs. enlightenment 407 MALaclypse 13-Feb-08 03:13
excavations reveal bones... 350 Ghia 06-Feb-08 02:35
Re: excavations reveal bones... 422 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-08 19:02
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 353 Warwick 07-Feb-08 00:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 365 Citizen Attorney 07-Feb-08 03:23
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 352 Warwick 07-Feb-08 17:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 375 Virgo 08-Feb-08 16:24
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 384 Warwick 09-Feb-08 00:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 376 Me 10-Feb-08 00:58
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 436 Warwick 10-Feb-08 04:51
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 388 The Elim 11-Feb-08 03:07
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 Citizen Attorney 09-Feb-08 05:33
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 307 Virgo 11-Feb-08 17:32
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 368 richarddullum 12-Feb-08 18:22
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 Virgo 13-Feb-08 08:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 399 richarddullum 13-Feb-08 15:31
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 367 Me 13-Feb-08 19:49
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 321 Virgo 14-Feb-08 09:24
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 394 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 02:50
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 385 richarddullum 15-Feb-08 02:57
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 403 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 03:52
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 360 Virgo 15-Feb-08 10:02
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 380 Sirfiroth 15-Feb-08 14:20
Re: Alford's refuation of Sitchin 367 richarddullum 16-Feb-08 01:55
Re: Hancock and Hawass 357 Houcad 04-Feb-08 20:08


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.