Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
The Swath image should be rotated about 15 degrees more in the clockwise direction to line up with the Viking image.
The dark region to the right has some strange looking things in it but is not the original "Face" feature.
The region in the rectangular outline is the reason that artificiality is suggested.
The hypothesis was that the feature under consideration from the Viking images of 20 + years ago is artificial. If someone were to test this hypothesis they might say get me a closer image realizing that this would cut down the field. If they were given a closer image that only contained what looked like the "eyebrow" region on the Viking images (there are at least 8 Viking images of this feature)a prediction might be, if the feature was artificial a closer better resolution image might give an artistic impression of individual eyebrow hairs if the feature was natural the law of increasing entropy would make any "dunes"
disperse and look less like an "eyebrow".
The result was that the "dunes" didn't randomly disperse after 24 years in the Martian wind, but rather upon closer inspection the feature looked even more like an "eyebrow" with individual eyebrow hairs being visible.

Theories have been suggested that the structure was "drawn" by a particle beam from above (the "face" is aproximately 6 miles by 6 miles) melting sand to a dark glassy material. The region to the right could have been "doodles" as the aerial artist tested his euiptment.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 475 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 26-Nov-00 11:43
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 230 David S 26-Nov-00 19:26
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 219 Pilgrim333 26-Nov-00 20:11
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 213 Christophe Leijnen 26-Nov-00 21:45
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 131 Bryan 26-Nov-00 22:04
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 163 laura 26-Nov-00 22:47
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 195 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 26-Nov-00 23:20
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 209 laura 27-Nov-00 10:15
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 210 Bryan 27-Nov-00 10:21
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 202 laura 27-Nov-00 12:24
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 236 David S 29-Nov-00 08:37
RE: Face on Mars is only ONE OF MANY 256 Sam Kendall 30-Nov-00 03:05
Yes and the 161 Frank Leonard 30-Nov-00 03:59
RE: Yes and the 226 Sam Kendall 01-Dec-00 03:15
RE: Yes and the 201 Frank Leonard 01-Dec-00 05:50
Please give me your opinion 142 Sam K 02-Dec-00 21:37
RE: Please give me your opinion 190 Frank Leonard 02-Dec-00 22:34
Thanks for your opinion 195 Sam K 04-Dec-00 00:52
You're welcome.... 204 Frank Leonard 04-Dec-00 01:23
RE: Please give me your opinion 153 laura 04-Dec-00 09:41
RE: Please give me your opinion 214 Frank Leonard 05-Dec-00 06:02
Do Ya sees Faces with aspects... 201 MARS REVEALER 30-Nov-00 16:12
Planetary Data System - apologize David. 206 Richard Fusniak (Fuzzy) 29-Nov-00 12:09
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 195 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 12:46
NASA can't be trusted 396 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 14:18
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 251 Chronos 29-Nov-00 23:48
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 214 R. Avry Wilson 29-Nov-00 14:32
Doctored NASA Face image 198 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 15:37
Doctored NASA Face image 208 Fuzzy 29-Nov-00 15:40
RE: Planetary Data System - apologize David. 171 Frank Leonard 29-Nov-00 16:04
RE: Please give me your opinion 205 R. Avry Wilson 04-Dec-00 14:42


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.