Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Joanne,

Could you just clarify one final point:

When was the term "hyperdiffusion" first coined; by whom; and to describe which particular example or concept of hyperdiffusion?

with thanks,

fiasco.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 446 Steve_L 20-Mar-04 22:54
It isn't just Prof. Malmstrom 301 barrystutner 21-Mar-04 00:09
n/t Please remove, needs to be fixed 242 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 00:38
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 262 ananda 21-Mar-04 02:13
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 282 Joanne 21-Mar-04 03:08
I agree, Joanne... 238 ananda 21-Mar-04 04:29
Re: I agree, Joanne... 287 Joanne 21-Mar-04 15:38
The differences. 267 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:43
Re: The differences. 274 ananda 22-Mar-04 03:30
Re: The differences. 258 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 04:42
Re: The differences. 251 fiascohoho 22-Mar-04 05:17
Re: The differences. 237 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:20
Hoho... 241 ananda 22-Mar-04 05:53
Definitions 263 Joanne 22-Mar-04 17:44
Re: Definitions 250 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 19:22
Re: Definitions 257 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 20:12
Re: Definitions 251 Joanne 22-Mar-04 21:16
Aha! 265 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:25
Re: Definitions 269 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 21:26
Re: Definitions 280 Joanne 22-Mar-04 22:55
Re: Definitions 257 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 23:32
q's. for Joanne re hyperdiffusion 243 ananda 23-Mar-04 00:46
Re: q's. for Joanne re hyperdiffusion 241 fiascohoho 23-Mar-04 00:56
Excellent question, but... 252 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 01:28
Re: Definitions 298 scimitar 23-Mar-04 12:46
Scimitar (& Joanne) 282 ananda 23-Mar-04 16:45
The subject might work better in fiction or poetry, however 229 ananda 23-Mar-04 16:50
Re: The subject might work better in fiction or poetry, however 274 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 17:03
The works of art can be most valuable and revealing 265 ananda 23-Mar-04 20:55
Re: The works of art can be most valuable and revealing 284 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 21:04
And furthermore... 268 ananda 23-Mar-04 21:15
Re: And furthermore... 247 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 21:32
Re: Definitions 252 Joanne 23-Mar-04 18:13
Re: Definitions 295 fiascohoho 23-Mar-04 19:38
Re: Definitions 253 fiascohoho 22-Mar-04 20:04
Re: Definitions 228 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 20:55
topic? 261 ananda 22-Mar-04 03:22
Re: topic? 246 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:09
Re: topic? 283 Joanne 22-Mar-04 17:54
Re: topic? 258 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 18:04
By the way - 225 Thirdwave 22-Mar-04 20:27
Ignoring insignificance. 271 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:29
Re: topic? 291 Joanne 22-Mar-04 21:49
Don't stoop to it Joanne. 240 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:53
Excuse me Mr Lemaster 282 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:34
Oh, archaeoastronomy and sim. myths, eh... 262 ananda 22-Mar-04 22:45
Re: topic? 260 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 23:49
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 276 Thunderbird 21-Mar-04 04:57
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 287 fiascohoho 21-Mar-04 05:27
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 262 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:35
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 276 Jaimi 21-Mar-04 05:23
n/t He sure did :-) 261 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:42
Coining a new term 229 R Avry Wilson 21-Mar-04 06:33
Re: Coining a new term 273 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 18:24
However... 250 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:10
Re: Coining a new term 279 R Avry Wilson 22-Mar-04 04:44
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 285 Archae Solenhofen 21-Mar-04 10:38
?? 276 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:18
Mod remark 271 Kees 21-Mar-04 19:43
Re: Mod remark 264 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 19:49
That is to be expected 244 Kees 21-Mar-04 20:21
Re: That is to be expected 234 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 20:36
Re: That is to be expected 259 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 05:44
Re: That is to be expected 258 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:27
If you can say this.. 270 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:10
Ponder this. 245 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 20:32
It just gets weirder 256 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 20:53
laymens terms, please. 261 Steve_L 21-Mar-04 20:42
Re: laymens terms, please. 242 Archae Solenhofen 22-Mar-04 03:54
Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 236 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:06
Salt exfol. only modern? 264 ananda 22-Mar-04 05:12
Re: Salt exfol. only modern? 269 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:15
Also. 246 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:18
Re: Also. 256 ananda 22-Mar-04 05:44
Re: Also. 269 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:15
Re: Also. 269 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:36
Re: Also. 233 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:45
Re: Also. 255 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:48
Re: Also. 260 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 07:26
Re: Also. 248 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:30
Re: Also. 270 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 21:08
Re: Also. 274 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:23
Re: Also. 233 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 21:48
Well, then.. 256 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:54
Re: Well, then.. 237 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 22:02
Re: Well, then.. 246 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 22:18
Re: Well, then.. 241 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 22:30
ROTFLMAO 263 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 15:58
Re: ROTFLMAO 295 Bent 22-Mar-04 16:22
Hi Bent! :<) 222 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 16:37
Re: Hi Bent! :<) 257 Bent 22-Mar-04 16:52
Re: Hi Bent! :<) 243 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:02
Re: Hi Bent! :<) 259 Bent 22-Mar-04 17:09
Re: Hi Bent! :<) 263 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:19
Re: Hi Bent! :<) 258 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:23
Re: ROTFLMAO 224 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:17
Re: ROTFLMAO 260 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:31
Re: ROTFLMAO 269 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:21
Thanks, Gerd.. 255 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 19:49
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 233 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:56
for the cynics... 241 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 20:05
Re: for the cynics... 267 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 20:08
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 271 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 21:15
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 259 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:24
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 249 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 21:34
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 275 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:44
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 288 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 21:54
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 251 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:14
MOD Warning 278 Kees 23-Mar-04 16:53
Re: MOD Warning 281 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 17:23
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 271 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:05
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 269 ArmchairObserver 23-Mar-04 16:26
Re: Thanks, Gerd.. 270 ArmchairObserver 22-Mar-04 21:11
to be precise.. 285 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 14:59
Re: to be precise.. 265 ArmchairObserver 23-Mar-04 16:44
Re: to be precise.. 254 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 16:56
Re: ROTFLMAO 224 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:26
I really must protest to the moderators 271 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:34
Re: I really must protest to the moderators 264 Bent 22-Mar-04 17:37
Re: I really must protest to the moderators 264 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:43
Re: I really must protest to the moderators 235 Bent 22-Mar-04 17:51
My hand remains open 260 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 18:07
and will optimistcally remain so n/t 249 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 20:14
Re: I really must protest to the moderators 280 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 20:57
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 248 Archae Solenhofen 22-Mar-04 06:55
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 256 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 07:37
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 287 Archae Solenhofen 23-Mar-04 08:44
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 289 Cynnara 23-Mar-04 17:16
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 260 Archae Solenhofen 24-Mar-04 20:31
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 245 Cynnara 24-Mar-04 23:54
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 259 R Avry Wilson 25-Mar-04 12:04
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 270 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:14
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 251 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 20:53
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 271 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 21:32
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 257 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:39
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 227 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:51
Re: Thank you. I'll try to be polite as I can. 233 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 23:00
Re: laymens terms, please. 252 ananda 22-Mar-04 05:08
Re: laymens terms, please. 271 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 05:10
Re: laymens terms, please. 267 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 16:10
Re: laymens terms, please. 249 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:14
Re: laymens terms, please. 264 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:25
Re: laymens terms, please. 264 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:50
Re: laymens terms, please. 266 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:58
Re: laymens terms, please. 234 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:36
Re: laymens terms, please. 257 Archae Solenhofen 22-Mar-04 07:24
Re: laymens terms, please. 239 ananda 22-Mar-04 12:45
a wild possibility.. 261 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 16:45
Re: laymens terms, please. 272 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 17:20
Re Malkowski's article 266 ananda 22-Mar-04 17:36
Re: Re Malkowski's article 261 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:54
Re: Re Malkowski's article 257 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:29
Re: Re Malkowski's article 251 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:04
Re: Re Malkowski's article 279 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 21:34
Re: Re Malkowski's article 222 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 21:37
n/t Why would they? 250 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:41
Because otherwise they agree with his findings? 264 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 22:05
Re: Because otherwise they agree with his findings? 255 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 22:23
Well, welllllllllll 260 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 22:38
Duh! Why do you think I asked..... 259 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 23:08
Re: Duh! Why do you think I asked..... 250 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 00:17
Re: Duh! Why do you think I asked..... 245 Cynnara 23-Mar-04 00:42
Re: Duh! Why do you think I asked..... 232 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 01:24
Safe to assume.. 263 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 15:54
Re: Safe to assume.. 260 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 19:39
still safe 246 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 19:46
Re: Because otherwise they agree with his findings? 258 Cynnara 22-Mar-04 22:42
David Coxill, MSC, BSC (Hons) Geology, supports older Sphinx dating 281 Thirdwave 23-Mar-04 02:32
n/t Thanks Thirdwave! 266 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 02:51
Re: David Coxill, MSC, BSC (Hons) Geology, supports older Sphinx dating 298 G. VDC 23-Mar-04 12:21
Coxhill's mission impossible 283 G. VDC 23-Mar-04 12:30
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 291 Thirdwave 24-Mar-04 12:17
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 258 W. L. Nixon 24-Mar-04 15:23
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 262 G. VDC 24-Mar-04 17:28
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 249 Alex S 28-Mar-04 21:44
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 296 G. VDC 29-Mar-04 11:51
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 264 Alex S 31-Mar-04 01:46
Re: Coxhill's mission impossible - NOT 269 ananda 24-Mar-04 20:41
LOL! 256 Steve_L 24-Mar-04 23:11
Re: David Coxill, MSC, BSC (Hons) Geology, supports older Sphinx dating 604 Cynnara 23-Mar-04 16:41
Re: Re Malkowski's article 202 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 21:02
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 293 W. L. Nixon 22-Mar-04 17:57
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 268 G. VDC 22-Mar-04 19:33
From jawest to Solenhofen 282 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 23:47
Ananda 227 Steve_L 22-Mar-04 23:52
Re: Ananda 258 ananda 23-Mar-04 01:00
Re: Ananda 268 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 01:22
Now do you see his error? 257 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 01:43
ananda is recking her own read 170 ananda 23-Mar-04 13:14
Re: ananda is recking her own read 233 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 20:37
Mods. Can you please move this thread... 276 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 01:37
Anyone ever see the Badlands? 254 JimLewandowski 23-Mar-04 01:52
Re: From jawest to Solenhofen 269 Archae Solenhofen 23-Mar-04 08:25
Re: From jawest to Solenhofen 241 R Avry Wilson 23-Mar-04 09:53
Re: Some ?Serious Substantive Issues? & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 268 Johnee 23-Mar-04 02:54
Re: Some ?Serious Substantive Issues? & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 249 Lee McGiffen 23-Mar-04 07:27
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 246 Richard Essame 23-Mar-04 06:43
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 267 G. VDC 23-Mar-04 13:06
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 257 W. L. Nixon 23-Mar-04 16:04
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 270 G. VDC 23-Mar-04 17:49
Another photo for Solenhofen, rather sharp corner 242 Steve_L 23-Mar-04 21:59
Re: Another photo for Solenhofen, rather sharp corner 256 Archae Solenhofen 24-Mar-04 07:23
Re: Some ‘Serious Substantive Issues’ & a Psycholinguistic Analysis 200 Jerome 27-Mar-04 11:56


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.