Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> the core of my post
>
> "> The question becomes as much a question of
> > organisation and infrastructure, as one of
> > technology. "
>
>
> I did not venture an opinion re technology

You can't imagine my surprise that you and every believer in ramps failed to address my questions. I was almost as stupefied as seeing the sun come up in the morning.

You can not find infrastructure if you don't know what you're looking for. Remarkably enough saying they mustta removed the ramps they mustta made does not prove that the absence of ramps means this was the "technology". It is an insult to the builders even refer to dragging stones as "technology".

The "core of your post" is simply to support orthodoxy.

> > there is what we know they had/knew
> > what we think they had/knew
> > what we think they might have had/knew
> > and
> >
> > what we have/know. "

We know they had "ramp" therefore men dragged stones.

Why don't you delineate EXACTLY what technology we know they had? Why don't you specify everything that was beyond their "tyechnology"?

> Shut the HELL UP!!!

It's funny how believers are so free with the insults but hold the truth so close to the vest and take umbrage at every single challenge to their beliefs. I'd love to hear your take on the purpose of steps.