Steve Clayton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Steve Clayton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Warwick Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Steve Clayton Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Warwick Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > " a canal leading up"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A physical impossibility.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Warwick,
> > >
> > > And, I am fine with that. Just wanted others
> to
> > > understand it was not my opinion.
> > >
> > > >A physical impossibility.
> > >
> > > Can't say, as I am not there to see what they
> > were
> > > looking at, in relation to the Pyramid. I
> don't
> > > think they provided us a map?  They could
> have
> > > droned this, if they knew how. I have a MJX.
> > They
> > > are fun.
> >
> > you are not getting my point.  It doesn't
> matter
> > what they were looking at.  It doesn't matter
> > where you are.
> >
> > without locks, canals cannot 'lead up'.
> >
> > Warwick
>
>
> Hi Warwick,
>
> I think they meant the canal could lead
> "horizontally" up to Pyramid. The "up" part is not
> a reference to altitude. It's used in the context,
> as traveling from one point, leading to another.


I know that London is UP from anywhere in England but.....When one is discussing highly technical propositions, vaguery is not constructive.(the same pun in 2 posts)


Warwick